Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***

***

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Joelle Gergis, Data Torturer

» Gergis

» Are energy budget TCR estimates biased low, as Richardson et al (2016) claim?

» Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error

» Schmidt’s Histogram Diagram Doesn’t Refute Christy

» Gavin Schmidt and Reference Period “Trickery”

» Objective Bayesian parameter estimation: Incorporating prior information

» Marvel et al.: GISS did omit land use forcing

» Bayesian parameter estimation: Radiocarbon dating re-examined

» Gerry Browning: In Memory of Professor Heinz Kreiss

***

***

Global Warming News

» House Hearing on Ivanpah Solar Plant Exposes Preferential Treatment

» EPA Administrator Testifies before House Science Committee

» EPA’s PM2.5 Co-Benefits PR Trick Exposed

» More Good News on Climate

» House Panel Asks McCarthy: How Is EPA’s Continuing Implementation of the Clean Power Plan Legal under the Stay?

» Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds

» What Every Conservative in Congress Needs to Know about the Paris Agreement

» Paris Climate Agreement: What Should a Republican President Do?

» Carbon Capture and Storage: Adequately Demonstrated?

» Renewable Fuel Standard: Fact Checking RFA Chief Bob Dinneen

***

***


***


***


***


***


***

More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Kerry: Climate Change as Dangerous as Terrorism
»Green Guru James Lovelock slaps down ‘global warming’: ‘Don’t try and save the world, it’s pure hubris’ – ‘Anyone that tries to predict more than 5 to 10 years ahead is a bit of an idiot’ 
Lovelock: 'We don’t need to save the planet, it’s looked after itself for four billion years. It’s a ...
»Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton’s VP Pick: ‘Humans have a responsibility to do something” about climate change
»Kerry: Regulating refrigerator chemicals are ‘of equal importance’ to battling ISIS
Kerry made the remarks as part of a pep talk for negotiators working through the weekend to amend a ...
»Poll: 77% Of Voters Agree With Trump’s Energy Position
»Backflip: Antarctic peninsula, posterchild of Polar disaster, has been cooling not warming
»University of Deleware Penguin Panic Paper Exposed As Flawed… Used ‘Tricks’
»Democratic Platform Calls For WWII-Scale Mobilization To Solve Climate Crisis
Democratic platform 2016: 'We are committed to a national mobilization, and to leading a global effo ...
»CBS Uses Heat Wave to Play Up ‘Bigger Problems’ From Climate Change
»Senate Dems Get Irrational During ‘Web of Denial’ Climate Change Event


Date published: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:03:04 +0000
Details

»Record Warm 2016? What a Difference One Month Makes
With the rapid cooling now occurring in the global average tropospheric temperature, my previous pre ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for June 2016: +0.34 deg. C
Second largest 2-month drop in global average satellite temperatures. Largest 2-month drop in tropic ...
»More on the Global Climate Emergency: Email from a “Fan”
I get some hate email from time to time. Actually, not very much. I guess I’m still cruising u ...
»“Climate System Scientist” Claims Jet Stream Crossing the Equator is Unprecedented
Paul Beckwith has a masters degree in laser optics, which he has somehow parlayed into being a “Climate System Scientist” to spread alarmism about the climate system. But his post “Unprecedented, Jet Stream Crosses Equator” suggests he knows little of meteorology, let alone climate. A “jet stream” in the usual sense of the word is […]
»2016 Will Likely See Record Global Warmth in Satellite Data
…but the approaching La Nina might extend the global warming pause to 20 years. Even though gl ...
»If Skeptics can be Prosecuted for Fraud, So can Alarmists
I’m glad to see this news report today, and I’ve been saying the same thing ever since t ...
»No, Spencer’s Research Wasn’t Funded by Peabody
My vacation this week was interrupted this morning by some hate e-mail…apparently, the recent ...
»Another Potential Reason Why Climate Sensitivity is Over-Estimated
BACKGROUND It’s been quite a while since I’ve discussed why the diagnosis of feedbacks i ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for May, 2016: +0.55 deg. C
NOTE: This is the fourteenth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ...
»UAH V6 Global Temperature Update for April, 2016: +0.71 deg. C
NOTE: This is the thirteenth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ...


Date published: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:09:21 +0000
Details

»My Climate Plan, Wherein a Climate Skeptic Actually Advocates for A Carbon Tax
I am always amazed at how people like to draw conclusions about what I write merely from the title, ...
»Come See My Climate Talk on Wednesday Evening, February 24, at Claremont-McKenna College
I am speaking on Wednesday night at the Athenaeum at Claremont-McKenna College near Pomona on Wednes ...
»US Average Temperature Trends in Context
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. There was some debate a while back around about a temperature chart so ...
»Revisiting (Yet Again) Hansen’s 1998 Forecast on Global Warming to Congress
I want to briefly revisit Hansen’s 1998 Congressional forecast.  Yes, I and many others have c ...
»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...


Date published: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:20:20 +0000
Details

»Trump-ing Hillary on EPA and Global Warming
By Steve Milloy, Breitbart.com If he lives up to his campaign rhetoric, a President Donald Trump wou ...
»Jimmy Kimmel: Totally F**king Wrong on Climate Change
By James Delingpole, Breitbart.com Jimmy Kimmel is great. Probably the most relaxed, amiable, and fu ...
»Obama’s Violating the Constitution by Not Submitting Climate Treaty to Senate
The Daily Signal Today at United Nations Headquarters in New York City, Secretary of State John Kerr ...
»Climate Hustle Coming to Theaters on May 2, The Debate is Just Beginning
By Elmer Beauregard I had the privilege of going to D.C. to see the Premiere of Climate Hustle last ...
»‘Climate Hustle’ goes to DC: Skeptical film to premiere on Capitol Hill
Riveting panel with Gov. Sarah Palin and other guests (March 31, 2016) The U.S. premiere of CFACT’s ...


Date published: Thu, 05 May 2016 20:12:47 +0000
Details

»Joelle Gergis, Data Torturer
In 2012, the then much ballyhoo-ed Australian temperature reconstruction of Gergis et al 2012 myster ...
»Gergis
redirect to here
»Are energy budget TCR estimates biased low, as Richardson et al (2016) claim?
A guest post by Nic Lewis   Introduction and Summary In a recently published paper (REA16), Mar ...
»Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error
I’ve submitted an article entitled “New Light on Deflategate: Critical Technical Errors ...
»Schmidt’s Histogram Diagram Doesn’t Refute Christy
In my most recent post,  I discussed yet another incident in the long running dispute about the inco ...
»Gavin Schmidt and Reference Period “Trickery”
In the past few weeks, I’ve been re-examining the long-standing dispute over the discrepancy b ...
»Objective Bayesian parameter estimation: Incorporating prior information
A guest article by Nic Lewis Introduction In a recent article I discussed Bayesian parameter inferen ...
»Marvel et al.: GISS did omit land use forcing
A guest article by Nic Lewis I reported in a previous post, here, a number of serious problems that ...
»Bayesian parameter estimation: Radiocarbon dating re-examined
A guest article by Nic Lewis Introduction In April 2014 I published a guest article about statistica ...
»Gerry Browning: In Memory of Professor Heinz Kreiss
Gerry Browning writes: The Correct System of Equations for Climate and Weather Models The system of ...


Date published: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 18:59:48 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Clean Energy Council delusional about wind power
Dug out of my files this 9 page April 2012 pdf from the CEC titled “There’s power in wind: nat ...
»Moratorium required on further Australian wind power
The AEMO price blowouts that flowed from the 9 May 2016 shutdown of South Australian coal fired powe ...
»Coast to gorgeous coast – Australia has only 200MW wind power at 8am
This NemWatch screenshot shows how wind is completely useless at times. Unless we shut the Nation do ...
»ABC headline “Hanson’s views on Islam dominate Q & A” is utter rubbish
A true headline could be “ABC inspired and GreenLeft attacks on Hanson dominate Q & A. ...
»Record cold July days in tropical NT and NW to central Qld
This animation for the 12th to 15th July shows a cool anomaly which moves from northern WA into the ...
»The Australian Energy Market Commission makes it up as it goes along
Read and weep – Review of market frameworks for power system security 14 July 2016 – No ...
»Will Malcolm Turnbull be Australia’s lamest “Lame Duck” Prime Minister?
So innovative and excited Malcolm gets to be PM with a micro-majority. Every day praying there will ...
»South Australia burning diesel to prop up electricity exports to Victoria
At 10.35am AEST Nemwatch shows SA burning diesel to generate 91MW to contribute to a Region Total De ...
»Fracking opponents on even weaker ground now
RetractionWatch.com reports – The authors of two environmental papers, including one about the ...
»Australian Electoral Commission travels backwards in time
Yesterday morning I noticed some odd reverse movements in the percentage of votes counted in the six ...


Date published: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 02:01:11 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
It is said that when playing CSGO games.Having the[more ...]
07/21 00:18

Posted by Anonymous
< Global Offensive > is a sequel to the distinc[more ...]
07/21 00:17

Posted by HaHa
< Global Offensive > is a sequel to the distinc[more ...]
07/21 00:15

Posted by Anonymous
This article can tell you recover deleted photos f[more ...]
07/17 18:49

Posted by Anonymous
You can try this android data recovery to recover [more ...]
07/17 18:46

Posted by Anonymous
This article may be helpful to you: recover delete[more ...]
07/17 18:43

Posted by Anonymous
Sometimes it happens that we mistakenly delete som[more ...]
07/13 20:34

Posted by aaronbaker
Anonymous wrote ...I have a similar experience. Tw[more ...]
07/04 19:26

Posted by Anonymous
I have a similar experience. Two months ago I dele[more ...]
07/04 02:45

Posted by Anonymous
That was truly amazing post thanks for share this [more ...]
07/02 06:13

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

NASA Revises Temperature Data - 1930's warmest on record!
Admin, Thursday 09 August 2007 - 20:06:13 // comment: 25 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

In a stunning turn of events data (quietly) released by NASA shows that the 4 warmest years ever recorded occurred in the 1930's, with the warmest year on record being 1934 (not 1998). Lets see if Al Gore revises his road show. Update - Global Warming is actually a Y2K bug!No Longer Supported
Data discovered on NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) website revises recorded temperatures for the United States. It is expected that similar revisions will also be made for global temperature recordings. This information was discovered by Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit on Wednesday (8/8/2007). No NASA press release, no James Hansen (head of GISS) announcement, nothing. Could it be because they don't want anyone to see it? The data is certainly devastating for the Al Gore camp which has based much of their Carbon Credits sales pitch on recent temperatures (e.g. claiming that 1998 was the warmest on record).

Other aspects of the data are just as stunning.
  • Only 4 of the top 10 warmest years occurred in the past 10 years (1998, 1999, 2006)
  • Out of the top 10 warmest years half occurred before 1940
  • The years 2000, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were cooler than the year 1900
  • 1996, just two years before what Al Gore called the hottest year in the history of the planet, was actually cooler than average.
  • 1921 was the third warmest year in recorded history (behind 1934 and 1998).


We're almost back to the 1970's theory of global cooling! The data clearly changes things.

Had we been living in 1934 we would have heard the same claims of global warming, this is the evidence that we would have heard at the time:
  • 8 of the past 10 years had been above average.
  • 1934 was the warmest year ever recorded. The warmest in over 54 years!


Shift that to 1944 and you would have seen that 17 of the past 21 years had been warmer than average. It is obvious that in just the past 125 years there have been other periods just as warm, or warmer, than what we are now experiencing. If we could look at the past 1,000 years with the accuracy of the past 100 years we would most likely find that this is not unusual at all.

Update: Turns out this NASA data was revised because of a Y2K bug in the algorithm used to adjust measurement station raw data. Blogger Finds Y2K Bug in NASA Climate Data. NASA's James Hansen has refused to release his algorithms but they were reverse engineered by Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit and NASA has since updated their data (so you know he Steve got it right). What this author finds truly disturbing (and disgusting) is that NASA would keep these algorithms secret. This is public information. Steve really should file a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request to obtain this and what ever else he needs. NASA would be very hard pressed to justify withholding that information. These events seriously call in to question anything James Hansen has touched, supervised, or managed. Not just because he got the math wrong but because he also hides his methods. He is apparently attempting to establish a new religion by requiring people to have faith in his data.

References:

As one blogger said "1998 had El Nino and 367ppmv CO2. What did 1934 have?", was 1934 mans fault too?

Climate Audit is being hit by either too much traffic or a Distributed Denial of Service Attack (they aren't sure which at this point). Below are the two blog posts that started it all.


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up


==== CLIMATE AUDIT'S August 8th, 2007 POST =====

A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open
By Steve McIntyre

A little unexpectedly, 1998 had a late bogey and 1934 had a late birdie. (I thought that they were both in the clubhouse since the turmoil seemed to be in the 2000s.) In any event, the new leader atop the U.S. Open is 1934.

2006 had a couple of late bogeys and fell to 4th place, behind even 1921. I think that there’s a little air in the 2006 numbers even within GISS procedures as the other post-2000 lost about 0.15 strokes through late bogeys, while it lost only 0.10 strokes. It is faltering and it might yet fall behind 1931 into 5th place.

Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900. (World rankings are calculated separately.) Note: For the new leaderboard see . The old data has been erased; by sheer chance, I had the old data active in my R-session but I can’t give a link to it.)

GISS U.S. Temperatures (deg C) in New Order

YearOldNew
19341.231.25
19981.241.23
19211.121.15
20061.231.13
19311.081.08
19990.940.93
19530.910.90
19900.880.87
19380.850.86
19390.840.85

Here’s the old leaderboard.

YearOldNew
19981.241.23
19341.231.25
20061.231.13
19211.121.15
19311.081.08
19990.940.93
19530.910.90
20010.900.76
19900.880.87
19380.850.86
==== END OF POST ====


==== CLIMATE AUDIT'S August 7th, 2007 POST =====

Will the Real USHCN Data Set Please Stand Up?
By Steve McIntyre

The GISS homepage formerly said:

The NASA GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) provides a measure of the changing global surface temperature with monthly resolution for the period since 1880, when a reasonably global distribution of meteorological stations was established. Input data for the analysis, collected by many national meteorological services around the world, is the unadjusted data of the Global Historical Climatology Network (Peterson and Vose, 1997 and 1998) except that the USHCN station records included were replaced by a later corrected version.


In econometrics, you couldn’t use loosy-goosy phrases like “replaced by a later corrected version.” You’d have to identify the version. Actually AGU policies (which apply to JGR) require proper data citation, although climate scientists publishing in AGU journals flout this policy, including Hansen here. Following an email to Hansen and Ruedy of GISS, they changed the introduction at the GISTEMP intro from:to the following:

Input data for the analysis, collected by many national meteorological services around the world, is the unadjusted data of the Global Historical Climatology Network (Peterson and Vose, 1997 and 1998) except that the USHCN station records up to 1999 were replaced by a version of USHCN data with further corrections after an adjustment computed by comparing the common 1990-1999 period of the two data sets. (We wish to thank Stephen McIntyre for bringing to our attention that such an adjustment is necessary to prevent creating an artificial jump in year 2000.)


This doesn’t really clarify the provenance of the data. In his email, Ruedy added:

In 2000, USHCN provided us with a file with corrections not contained in the GHCN data. Unlike the GHCN data, that product is not kept current on a regular basis. Hence we used (as you noticed) the GHCN data to extend those data in our further updates (2000-present)


Well, I hadn’t really “noticed” that they had used GHCN data to extend the USHCN data. I’ve done lots of cross-comparisons with different variations trying to identify exactly where the GHCN raw data came from. I’ve put up many plots at CA showing GISS raw as compared to different USHCN versions and I’ve done many more that I’ve not posted up. At his point, there’s one thing that we can say for sure: I’ve now looked at GISS raw as compared to GHCN raw data in the post-2000 period and in the few sites that I’ve examined since receiving this email (Detroit Lakes, Port Angeles), there is an exact match. So at least we’ve tracked down one aspect of the provenance of GISS raw data. I’ve done a comparison plot below for Detroit Lakes MN, a series that we’ve looked at before. After 2000, the match is exact (the delta is 0.0). However, before 2000, the USHCN TOBS/adjusted series sort of match for a while but the match tails off in the earlier portions, with the GISS raw version being quite different.


hansen48.gif

So where does the GISS raw version come from? At this stage, I think that we can declare that it doesn’t come from any of the USHCN version 2 (raw, TOBS, adjsted). If it did, then the versions would match as exactly as the GHCN raw and GISS raw after 2000. So where does it come from? Another stupid climate science guessing game, although hopefully it will solved in a shorter time than the unsolved MBH99 confidence intervals.

Ruedy’s letter has opened up the possibility of really obsolete data being used - I hadn’t thought to look at really obsolete data. I browsed through some obsolete data in connection with Swindle - who would have thought that we’d be doing so again. Two possibilities spring to mind: (1) maybe he’s using something from USHCN version 1; this is online, but I don’t think that the dates are right. (2) Maybe there’s an earlier USHCN version 2 that’s been overwritten (3) maybe he’s using an old GHCN version before 2000. Maybe none of the above - hey, it’s climate science.
==== END OF POST ====



Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2132 | Replies: 969 | Views: 6936829
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English