Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***

***

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Centenary of the End of the Battle of the Somme

» The Destruction of Huma Abedin’s Emails on the Clinton Server and their Surprise Recovery

» Was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as Abram et al. claim?

» Re-examining Cook’s Mt Read (Tasmania) Chronology

» Esper et al 2016 and the Oroko Swamp

» Gergis and Law Dome

» Joelle Gergis, Data Torturer

» Gergis

» Are energy budget TCR estimates biased low, as Richardson et al (2016) claim?

» Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error

***

***

Global Warming News

» SJW-day at COP22

» Clean Power Plan: EPA’s Updated Base Case Now Tallies with EIA Data

» Clean Power Plan Oral Argument Transcript Available Here!

» President Obama and Chinese President Xi will officially join the Paris Climate Treaty on 3rd September

» South China Morning Post reports: China and US to ratify landmark Paris climate deal ahead of G20 summit, sources reveal

» Posting: Little-Known Documents Pertinent to Assessing the Legality of EPA’s Clean Energy Incentive Program

» Kyoto-Financed Cook Stoves Fail as Health/Climate “Intervention”

» CEQ Finalizes NEPA Guidance for Greenhouse Gases: Will Pointless Keystone XL Controversy Become ‘New Normal’?

» Democratic Platform Vows To Meet Climate Challenge with Good-Paying Jobs, Cheaper Energy from Green Sources, and National Mobilization

» Cognitive Dissonance Among Elected Climate Alarmists

***

***


***


***


***


***


***

More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Trump Will Issue Executive Orders To Dismantle Obama’s ‘Climate Action Plan’
»UPDATE: Congress launches probe into NOAA study that duped world leaders over ‘global warming’
»Morano hails EPA’s New Chief Pruitt: No more ‘ridiculous statements about how EPA regs will somehow alter global temps’
"A breath of fresh air has arrived at the EPA. No longer do we have to listen to ridiculous statemen ...
»CO2 emissions ‘crashing’: Take Back Al Gore’s Nobel & Give It To Fracking Industry
Global warming crusader Al Gore won a Nobel Prize merely for his profit-making activities as ...
»Fact-checking Al Gore’s controversial, apocalyptic climate conference
»Scott Pruitt, longtime adversary of EPA, confirmed to lead the agency under Trump admin.
»Polar Bear Numbers Still On The Rise, Despite ‘Global Warming’
The new population estimates from the 2016 Scientific Working Group are somewhere between 22,6 ...
»Scott Pruitt’s Game-Changing Call for Debate on Climate Science
These problems were summarized in the 2016 State of the Climate Report, released during the UN Clima ...
»A Climate Scientist Is Smeared for Blowing the Whistle on ‘Corrected’ Data
»Gore warns ‘global warming’ will make parts of Earth ‘no longer be fit for human habitation’
“This is a relatively new finding, that in some areas of the Middle East and north Africa, there wil ...


Date published: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 06:05:00 +0000
Details

»Fan Mail
Once in a while I share “fan mail” I get in response to my blog, and I thought the follo ...
»Oroville Dam: Crisis Eases, Emergency Spillway Repairs in Progress
With the evacuation order lifted last evening, and ~185,000 residents returning to their homes in Or ...
»The Oroville Dam Crisis: What Happened, What’s Next?
After watching the Oroville Dam crisis evolve over the last several days, and reading various expert ...
»Oroville Emergency Spillway: Does this Look Like Bedrock to You?
I’ve had a little criticism here and on Facebook that I’m not a geologist, so I shouldn ...
»Oroville Dam Emergency Spillway Repairs Starting
With daylight and Oroville Lake water levels now 4 feet below the lip of the emergency spillway, we ...
»Oroville Dam Emergency Spillway Expected to Fail within the Hour
So, it turns out all of that bedrock that made the Oroville Dam design so fail-safe is not going to ...
»Why the Oroville Dam Won’t Fail
While it is said, “never say never”, after researching this issue I’m pretty convi ...
»Is Failure of the Oroville Dam Possible?
The last couple of days have not made me very confident in the predictions of engineers associated w ...
»Lake Oroville 100% Full; Emergency Spillway Use Hours Away?
UPDATE: As of 9 a.m. PST, the water level has increased to 901.24 ft., and water is overflowing the ...
»Lake Oroville Near 100% Full, Emergency Overflow Imminent
With a winter of phenomenal heavy rains and snow (over 400 inches so far at some Sierra Nevada locat ...


Date published: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 12:59:15 +0000
Details

»My Climate Plan, Wherein a Climate Skeptic Actually Advocates for A Carbon Tax
I am always amazed at how people like to draw conclusions about what I write merely from the title, ...
»Come See My Climate Talk on Wednesday Evening, February 24, at Claremont-McKenna College
I am speaking on Wednesday night at the Athenaeum at Claremont-McKenna College near Pomona on Wednes ...
»US Average Temperature Trends in Context
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. There was some debate a while back around about a temperature chart so ...
»Revisiting (Yet Again) Hansen’s 1998 Forecast on Global Warming to Congress
I want to briefly revisit Hansen’s 1998 Congressional forecast.  Yes, I and many others have c ...
»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...


Date published: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:20:20 +0000
Details

»Elmer’s PowerPoint Presentation – Confessions of a Graphic Designer
By Elmer Beauregard I decided to put part of my PowerPoint presentation online. As a Graphic designe ...
»Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
By Daily Rose, DailyMail.com The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisa ...
»Climate Fraud Exposed: CO2 doesn’t rise up, trap and retain heat
Written by John O’Sullivan, principia-scientific.org We have been lied to: Carbon dioxide (CO2 ...
»American Youth Indoctrinated Under Pretense Of Environmental
Millie Weaver interviews Holly Swanson about the undisclosed agenda of the newly implemented environ ...
»Minnesota Man Thinks He May Have Found a Viking Skull
Have you ever heard of the Kensington Runestone? Well this Minnesota man just may have found somethi ...


Date published: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:37:05 +0000
Details

»Centenary of the End of the Battle of the Somme
November 18 marks the centenary of the end of the Battle of the Somme, an event that passed essentia ...
»The Destruction of Huma Abedin’s Emails on the Clinton Server and their Surprise Recovery
Despite extraordinarily intense coverage of all aspects of Hillary Clinton’s emails, all comme ...
»Was early onset industrial-era warming anthropogenic, as Abram et al. claim?
A guest post by Nic Lewis Introduction A recent PAGES 2k Consortium paper in Nature, Abram et al., t ...
»Re-examining Cook’s Mt Read (Tasmania) Chronology
In today’s post, I’m going to re-examine (or more accurately, examine de novo) Ed Cook ...
»Esper et al 2016 and the Oroko Swamp
Jan Esper, prominent in early Climate Audit posts as an adamant serial non-archiver, has joined with ...
»Gergis and Law Dome
In today’s post, I’m going to examine Gergis’ dubious screening out of the Law Dom ...
»Joelle Gergis, Data Torturer
In 2012, the then much ballyhoo-ed Australian temperature reconstruction of Gergis et al 2012 myster ...
»Gergis
redirect to here
»Are energy budget TCR estimates biased low, as Richardson et al (2016) claim?
A guest post by Nic Lewis   Introduction and Summary In a recently published paper (REA16), Mar ...
»Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error
I’ve submitted an article entitled “New Light on Deflategate: Critical Technical Errors ...


Date published: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 04:01:23 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Floods but no Feb 2017 rain recorded yet by BoM in Perth dam catchments
How bizarre is this – heavy rain and floods starting 9/10 Feb – but no Feb 2017 rain rec ...
»Labor abandons 50% by 2030 renewables target
There were signs from Perth a week ago – then the Illawarra Mercury had a crack at it – ...
»Keep Hazelwood open
Hazelwood 1,600MW of electricity generation is due to close at end of March. This must further stres ...
»Cold day records smashed in Perth region
Thanks to Chris Gillham – From Perth Region (Western Australia not Scotland) Feb has been mode ...
»Watching our electricity grid trainwreck
South Australia grid sheds load last night. SA heatwave forces blackouts to cope with electricity de ...
»President Clinton 1995 speaks on borders
Brilliant 84 second clip from a very young looking President Bill Clinton talking about immigration ...
»BoM trumpets January the warmest month on record for Sydney
The BoM blah-blahs on – Every station in the metropolitan area recorded its highest January me ...
»Birds igniting on powerlines near wind turbines
Recall my 19 Jan post Tarago fire starts on Capital wind farm – Now the Goulburn Post has ...
»BoM exaggerates again Canberra hottest January
Claiming Canberra had its hottest January – Hottest January on record sees Canberra’s po ...
»Lead reported in water supply to Perth hospitals
This story started last year with lead reported in the water onsite at the brand new Perth Children ...


Date published: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 02:01:31 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by gertrudedougla
This NSF to PST Converter is convenient utility th[more ...]
02/21 05:00

Posted by rosewurster
Howdy, folks! What are the vital signs of the plan[more ...]
02/17 02:41

Posted by James Bond
I enjoyed over read your blog post. Your blog have[more ...]
02/13 03:52

Posted by ShirleyCS
MySQL is a famous relational database management s[more ...]
02/06 06:17

Posted by Anonymous
Best tool to convert corrupted or indecipherable O[more ...]
02/03 04:19

Posted by Anonymous
Helps recover data in case of data loss due to har[more ...]
02/02 05:34

Posted by Anonymous
So your QuickBooks (.qbw) database is corrupted or[more ...]
02/02 02:41

Posted by Anonymous
An advanced professional OLM to PST Converter tool[more ...]
02/01 23:38

Posted by Anonymous
Make use of Windows data recovery software, you ca[more ...]
01/31 04:04

Posted by Anonymous
Hello
01/31 03:57

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

NASA Revises Temperature Data - 1930's warmest on record!
Admin, Thursday 09 August 2007 - 20:06:13 // comment: 25 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

In a stunning turn of events data (quietly) released by NASA shows that the 4 warmest years ever recorded occurred in the 1930's, with the warmest year on record being 1934 (not 1998). Lets see if Al Gore revises his road show. Update - Global Warming is actually a Y2K bug!No Longer Supported
Data discovered on NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) website revises recorded temperatures for the United States. It is expected that similar revisions will also be made for global temperature recordings. This information was discovered by Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit on Wednesday (8/8/2007). No NASA press release, no James Hansen (head of GISS) announcement, nothing. Could it be because they don't want anyone to see it? The data is certainly devastating for the Al Gore camp which has based much of their Carbon Credits sales pitch on recent temperatures (e.g. claiming that 1998 was the warmest on record).

Other aspects of the data are just as stunning.
  • Only 4 of the top 10 warmest years occurred in the past 10 years (1998, 1999, 2006)
  • Out of the top 10 warmest years half occurred before 1940
  • The years 2000, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were cooler than the year 1900
  • 1996, just two years before what Al Gore called the hottest year in the history of the planet, was actually cooler than average.
  • 1921 was the third warmest year in recorded history (behind 1934 and 1998).


We're almost back to the 1970's theory of global cooling! The data clearly changes things.

Had we been living in 1934 we would have heard the same claims of global warming, this is the evidence that we would have heard at the time:
  • 8 of the past 10 years had been above average.
  • 1934 was the warmest year ever recorded. The warmest in over 54 years!


Shift that to 1944 and you would have seen that 17 of the past 21 years had been warmer than average. It is obvious that in just the past 125 years there have been other periods just as warm, or warmer, than what we are now experiencing. If we could look at the past 1,000 years with the accuracy of the past 100 years we would most likely find that this is not unusual at all.

Update: Turns out this NASA data was revised because of a Y2K bug in the algorithm used to adjust measurement station raw data. Blogger Finds Y2K Bug in NASA Climate Data. NASA's James Hansen has refused to release his algorithms but they were reverse engineered by Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit and NASA has since updated their data (so you know he Steve got it right). What this author finds truly disturbing (and disgusting) is that NASA would keep these algorithms secret. This is public information. Steve really should file a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request to obtain this and what ever else he needs. NASA would be very hard pressed to justify withholding that information. These events seriously call in to question anything James Hansen has touched, supervised, or managed. Not just because he got the math wrong but because he also hides his methods. He is apparently attempting to establish a new religion by requiring people to have faith in his data.

References:

As one blogger said "1998 had El Nino and 367ppmv CO2. What did 1934 have?", was 1934 mans fault too?

Climate Audit is being hit by either too much traffic or a Distributed Denial of Service Attack (they aren't sure which at this point). Below are the two blog posts that started it all.


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up


==== CLIMATE AUDIT'S August 8th, 2007 POST =====

A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open
By Steve McIntyre

A little unexpectedly, 1998 had a late bogey and 1934 had a late birdie. (I thought that they were both in the clubhouse since the turmoil seemed to be in the 2000s.) In any event, the new leader atop the U.S. Open is 1934.

2006 had a couple of late bogeys and fell to 4th place, behind even 1921. I think that there’s a little air in the 2006 numbers even within GISS procedures as the other post-2000 lost about 0.15 strokes through late bogeys, while it lost only 0.10 strokes. It is faltering and it might yet fall behind 1931 into 5th place.

Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900. (World rankings are calculated separately.) Note: For the new leaderboard see . The old data has been erased; by sheer chance, I had the old data active in my R-session but I can’t give a link to it.)

GISS U.S. Temperatures (deg C) in New Order

YearOldNew
19341.231.25
19981.241.23
19211.121.15
20061.231.13
19311.081.08
19990.940.93
19530.910.90
19900.880.87
19380.850.86
19390.840.85

Here’s the old leaderboard.

YearOldNew
19981.241.23
19341.231.25
20061.231.13
19211.121.15
19311.081.08
19990.940.93
19530.910.90
20010.900.76
19900.880.87
19380.850.86
==== END OF POST ====


==== CLIMATE AUDIT'S August 7th, 2007 POST =====

Will the Real USHCN Data Set Please Stand Up?
By Steve McIntyre

The GISS homepage formerly said:

The NASA GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) provides a measure of the changing global surface temperature with monthly resolution for the period since 1880, when a reasonably global distribution of meteorological stations was established. Input data for the analysis, collected by many national meteorological services around the world, is the unadjusted data of the Global Historical Climatology Network (Peterson and Vose, 1997 and 1998) except that the USHCN station records included were replaced by a later corrected version.


In econometrics, you couldn’t use loosy-goosy phrases like “replaced by a later corrected version.” You’d have to identify the version. Actually AGU policies (which apply to JGR) require proper data citation, although climate scientists publishing in AGU journals flout this policy, including Hansen here. Following an email to Hansen and Ruedy of GISS, they changed the introduction at the GISTEMP intro from:to the following:

Input data for the analysis, collected by many national meteorological services around the world, is the unadjusted data of the Global Historical Climatology Network (Peterson and Vose, 1997 and 1998) except that the USHCN station records up to 1999 were replaced by a version of USHCN data with further corrections after an adjustment computed by comparing the common 1990-1999 period of the two data sets. (We wish to thank Stephen McIntyre for bringing to our attention that such an adjustment is necessary to prevent creating an artificial jump in year 2000.)


This doesn’t really clarify the provenance of the data. In his email, Ruedy added:

In 2000, USHCN provided us with a file with corrections not contained in the GHCN data. Unlike the GHCN data, that product is not kept current on a regular basis. Hence we used (as you noticed) the GHCN data to extend those data in our further updates (2000-present)


Well, I hadn’t really “noticed” that they had used GHCN data to extend the USHCN data. I’ve done lots of cross-comparisons with different variations trying to identify exactly where the GHCN raw data came from. I’ve put up many plots at CA showing GISS raw as compared to different USHCN versions and I’ve done many more that I’ve not posted up. At his point, there’s one thing that we can say for sure: I’ve now looked at GISS raw as compared to GHCN raw data in the post-2000 period and in the few sites that I’ve examined since receiving this email (Detroit Lakes, Port Angeles), there is an exact match. So at least we’ve tracked down one aspect of the provenance of GISS raw data. I’ve done a comparison plot below for Detroit Lakes MN, a series that we’ve looked at before. After 2000, the match is exact (the delta is 0.0). However, before 2000, the USHCN TOBS/adjusted series sort of match for a while but the match tails off in the earlier portions, with the GISS raw version being quite different.


hansen48.gif

So where does the GISS raw version come from? At this stage, I think that we can declare that it doesn’t come from any of the USHCN version 2 (raw, TOBS, adjsted). If it did, then the versions would match as exactly as the GHCN raw and GISS raw after 2000. So where does it come from? Another stupid climate science guessing game, although hopefully it will solved in a shorter time than the unsolved MBH99 confidence intervals.

Ruedy’s letter has opened up the possibility of really obsolete data being used - I hadn’t thought to look at really obsolete data. I browsed through some obsolete data in connection with Swindle - who would have thought that we’d be doing so again. Two possibilities spring to mind: (1) maybe he’s using something from USHCN version 1; this is online, but I don’t think that the dates are right. (2) Maybe there’s an earlier USHCN version 2 that’s been overwritten (3) maybe he’s using an old GHCN version before 2000. Maybe none of the above - hey, it’s climate science.
==== END OF POST ====



Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2157 | Replies: 1077 | Views: 7380833
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English