Main Menu
Google Search
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

Science and Public Policy Institute

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis


» Shukla’s Gold

» Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20

» The “Blade” of Ocean2K

» The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”

» Op Ed on Deflategate

» Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?

» Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error

» Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline

» Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?

» Goodell and Deflategate Science



Global Warming News

» Sierra Club President’s Testimony Reveals It’s Worse Than We Thought. Climate Change? No. Group Think About Climate Change.

» What to Make of India’s Carbon-Intensity Pledge

» Free Market Groups Submit Joint Comment Letter on Obama Administration’s Heavy Truck Greenhouse Gas/Fuel Economy Standards

» Fault for Awful Ozone Rule Lies with Congress and the Courts (for giving all the decision making authority to CASAC)

» Regarding Failure of D.C. Climate Rally, Headlines Say It All

» September Was Cruelest Month for Jonathan Chait’s Feature on Climate Change Policy in New York Magazine

» ‘Moderate’ Rs Call for ‘Action’ on Climate (Crank Me-Too Amplifiers Up to Eleven)

» Obama’s Not-So-Grand Energy Strategy: *Aimless Authoritarianism*

» Pope Francis Will Try To Meet with Ailing Fidel Castro and Will Be Met by Obamas at Andrews AFB

» Why Climate Diplomacy Makes Me Laugh








More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.


»Sierra Club Prez Squirms, Consults, Ignores Cruz’s Satellite Data Questions – ‘he looks like Al Capone on trial’
Asked about satellite temperature data showing no significant warming trend over the last 18 years, ...
»Sec. Of State Kerry: ‘We Have Climate Refugees Today’
Speaking Monday in Valparaiso, Chile, Secretary of State John Kerry was asked why the term "climate ...
»Obama creates new position ‘dedicated solely to messaging the global warming agenda’
»Benefits to the Weatherization Assistance Program’s Energy Efficiency Investments Four Times the Costs
The Department of Energy (DOE) has since released 36 documents (here and here), totaling 4,446 pages ...
»Ted Cruz Presses Sierra Club On Global Warming Pause
When asked about the 18 year pause in global warming, as documented by satellite data, Mr. Mair deni ...
»Documents Reveal Dem Efforts to Discredit EPA Critics: Emails and talking points memos detail ways to ‘sow doubts about our opponents motives’
»NYT’s Andrew Revkin Admits UN IPCC Operates Like Religion: Process ‘is not too dissimilar to the white smoke rising from a Vatican chimney’
»New Chair of the U.N. Climate Panel
»Hulk actor Mark Ruffalo: Entire GOP Has ‘Turned Their Back on Science’
»Climatologist Dr. Tim Ball: ‘Environmentalists Are The New Puritans: Religious Bullies’

Date published: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 19:51:21 +0000

»South Carolina Flooding is NOT a 1 in 1,000 Year Event
There is no question that the flooding in South Carolina is exceptional, even historic. But a once o ...
»Historic Flooding in South Carolina Expected
UPDATE: (8:50 a.m. EDT Sunday, Oct. 4). As predicted, heavy rain has spread over much of SC during t ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for Sept. 2015: +0.25 deg C
NOTE: This is the sixth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the old ...
»Hurricane Joaquin: False Alarm for the U.S. East Coast?
The GFS model runs from last night and this morning have shifted the track of Hurricane Joaquin sign ...
»Hurricane Joaquin: “Established by God”
After ten years without a major (Cat3+) hurricane hit on the U.S., intensifying Hurricane Joaquin (f ...
»Minnesota Hearing Addresses the Social Cost of Carbon
I testified before an administrative law judge (ALJ) in St. Paul, MN last week as part of a process ...
»S. Fred Singer: A 1960s Trailblazer for Satellite Remote Sensing
Those of you who follow our efforts to bring some balance to offset global warming alarmism also lik ...
»Satellite Reveals Biblical Mideast Duststorm
The dust storm currently impacting the Middle East started over northern Syria two days ago, and has ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for Aug. 2015: +0.28 C
NOTE: This is the fifth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the old ...
»Hurricane Fred a New Record: Farthest East
Newly formed Hurricane Fred over the Cape Verde Islands is, as far as I can tell, the farthest east ...

Date published: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:13:59 +0000

»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...

Date published: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:04 +0000

»Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
By Michael Bastasch – The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate sci ...
»Where Have All the Eagles Gone?
Checkout M4GW’s New Music Video.
»Obama to rename tallest U.S. peak in historic Alaska visit
By Jim Acosta, CNN Anchorage, Alaska (CNN)To hear the White House describe Alaska, the state has bec ...
»Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’
By Christopher Booker, The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk ...
»How Obama’s New CO2 Rules Will Impact Global CO2 Levels & Temperature
By Elmer Beauregard On Monday Obama came out with his new CO2 regulations increasing the amount of c ...

Date published: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:17:30 +0000

»Shukla’s Gold
Roger Pielke Jr recently made the remarkable discovery that, in addition to his university salary fr ...
»Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20
The RICO-20 gang of climate academics commenced its supposed campaign against misinformation with fa ...
»The “Blade” of Ocean2K
I’ve had a longstanding interest in high-resolution ocean proxies (with posts as early as 2005 ...
»The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”
The long-awaited (and long overdue) PAGES2K synthesis of 57 high-resolution ocean sediment series (O ...
»Op Ed on Deflategate
In Financial Post here. My submitted version was a little harsher. #deflategate For related blog pos ...
»Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?
In today’s post,  I’m going to show the Deflategate data from a new perspective.   Rathe ...
»Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error
On June 29, I sent a letter to Ted Wells, notifying him of the erroneous description of key figures ...
»Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline
In an earlier article,  I pointed out that essential figures in the Exponent report contained (what ...
»Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?
The transcript of the Brady appeal before Goodell has been released and it’s astonishing to se ...
»Goodell and Deflategate Science
Yesterday, Roger Goodell released his decision on the Brady appeal. Most of the early discussion has ...

Date published: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 20:02:07 +0000

Date published: not known

»So the Australian Govt is slow to issue Geert Wilders a visa – the Australian Liberty Alliance should stand on its own two feet and launch the party ASAP
The ABC reports – Geert Wilders’ visa delay ‘an assault on freedom of speech ...
»Another climate sceptic article makes it into the main-stream media
Will have the warmists fuming – Climate change debate cracks – There is a paywall. Read ...
»In several ways the Turnbull Govt has already taken Australia sharply to the left – conservatives need a plan
Although it is only two weeks since the Malcolm Turnbull coup de etat the leftward turn in the direc ...
»Another ABC anti-mining beat up fearmongering about a cyanide spill from the closed Texas silver mine in SE Queensland
Three ABC articles – radio – 7.30 Report. Looks from the air like a normal open cut ...
»Rainbow Beach “sinkhole” is so obviously the landward end of a slump in marine sediments
Just as well it happened near low tide or it could have been blamed on rising sea levels. Similar ha ...
»So Minister Greg Hunt ‘killed’ the excellent idea from Tony Abbott’s department for a Bureau of Meteorology review
Now I suppose we are stuck for evah with these insane year after year, after year, after year, after ...
»New Australian Defence Minister – Senator Marise Payne
Here is the Senator’s biography on her own web page – can somebody please explain to me ...
»Anti-mining beat up is #1 story on ABC
The story ignores much of the reality about our mining history – for example new mines are oft ...
»New www site – Stop Malcolm Turnbull
Enjoy this fascinating timeline of the life and achievments of our new Prime Minister.
»What odds our new Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull will go to a double dissolution election?
I expect the new PM will get a great bounce in the polls – what an opportunity for an early el ...

Date published: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 01:20:11 +0000
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
Insightful facts! After reading of this blog, my m[more ...]
09/17 07:01

Posted by Anonymous
I’m totally impressed! A genuine and worthy conten[more ...]
09/17 06:52

Posted by Anonymous
Well I have heard this lot and so have I heard tha[more ...]
08/31 05:05

Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for the cool blog and great forum :) houseo[more ...]
08/09 21:23

Posted by Anonymous
Is a great topic salwar suits in collection salwar[more ...]
07/09 00:23

Posted by Anonymous
I think, it’s a thoughtful posting and offering al[more ...]
07/06 04:47

Posted by Anonymous
Very good digestive tract wellbeing = bodily healt[more ...]
06/21 05:40

Posted by Anonymous
[quote][quote]You put certainly revolutionary idea[more ...]
05/14 11:08

Posted by Anonymous
Anonymous wrote ...You put certainly revolutionary[more ...]
05/12 23:28

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:27

Relevant Sponsors

Any Amount helps support improvements

* or *

Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Sunday 07 June 2009 - 21:51:28 // comment: 43 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

Most everyone knows the classic definition of peer review, "the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field". But do you know how the process actually works? Dr. Weinstein does; he has been on both ends of the process. No Longer Supported
Often times, the ones performing the peer review are friends or close colleagues of the original author. Furthermore, if anyone were to come out of the woodwork and debunk anthropogenic global warming, it would dry up that seemingly infinite sea of funding they were receiving. In fact, the "Piltdown Man" hoax, where the skull of a "missing link" was created by combining the jawbone of an orangutan with a human skull by fame-craving scientists, went on for over 40 years because of lack of true, proper scientific scrutiny. They were so anxious to prove evolution that they were blinded in their observations. Dr. Weinstein reveals in this article how many scientists today may also be blinded in the peer review process by the temptations of funding, prestige, and possibly even the sheer peer pressure that occurs within the scientific community.

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue
Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 29, 2009

Monographs, books, technical papers, white papers, and other forms of published material that are to be widely disseminated should ideally be examined by independent reviewers (generally called peer reviewers) with reasonable knowledge of the subject area. The reviewer may or may not be as expert in the details of the subject as the author, but should be at least generally expert in a broader overlapping field. Frequently papers have material that covers more than one subject area and people within a narrow field may do poorly reviewing the broader subject. It is frequently best to have some reviewers that are knowledgeable people but not as close to the narrow field as the author, for a more independent and broader coverage.

The reviews, possibly resulting in suggested changes, do not assure the final material is correct. The lack of a review also does not mean the results are not correct and clear. It just increases the chance for errors to slip through.

If the paper is very complex or has numerous references, it may not be possible to do as good a review as desired in a reasonable time unless the reviewer is intimately familiar with the work. These reviews are often done within a small group of experts, who may even have collaborated on each others papers. The members of the overly narrow review group may have evolved toward a common understanding on the subject, and if the understanding is not correct, almost all of the limited number of experts in that field may make common mistakes that outside reviewers may not make. However, a reviewer outside that group may not be expert enough to be fully on top of the material. This is a problem without a clear solution, especially in fields with a limited number of experts. There are also occasions when errors in assumptions used in developing equations, or in interpretation of instrumentation result in erroneous conclusions that are repeated in many papers until the error is caught and corrected. For this reason all papers must be considered suspect until history vindicates or falsifies them. A paradigm shift on a subject may result from these types of errors being corrected at later times.

An example of the problems that may arise with peer-reviewed papers occurred on a project that I worked on for several years. The branch I was working with was examining possible methods to reduce turbulent skin friction over surfaces, with the goal of reducing aircraft and ship drag, and thus save fuel. We had developed several successful concepts that gave small but useful reductions in drag. These included “longitudinal microgrooves”, “large eddy breakup devices”, and for water flow, “air bubbles in longitudinal grooves”. An additional concept we worked on was a “compliant wall”. This last method appeared to be particularly promising as a method to damp out near wall turbulence by absorbing wall pressure fluctuations. Unlike the other methods, this last technique required a soft and movable wall, so it was more difficult to measure the drag of a test object. Several other groups all over the world also started work on this concept (bandwagon effect), and our group (and many of the other groups) obtained what we thought were favorable results in several tests. Dozens of peer-reviewed papers were published in main line journals (e.g., Journal of Fluid Physics, AIAA journal, etc.). The main experimental technique used to measure the drag for this type of model was a hot-wire Reynolds stress probe. Test results seemed to indicate a large reduction in drag. In order to independently verify the favorable result obtained with this technique, I designed and had built a large sensitive drag balance to directly measure the drag on a panel model. The direct measurement did not show the reduction in drag indicated by the hot wire probe. After much analysis, I found the cause of the problem. Reynolds stress drag measurements are proxy drag measurements. They are related to the drag under some special assumptions. In this case the critical assumption was that all of the vertical motion energy in the boundary layer was due to turbulent flow, and stayed in the boundary layer. It turned out that with a compliant wall, the flexible wall motion induced a vertical motion pressure wave that propagated as sound out of the boundary layer, so the required assumption was not valid.

Many of the other favorable tests had used the same type of probe with the same false positive result. Those that did not use the hot wire often gave results that were confusing, but many still passed peer review. It appears that since some of the other papers seemed to be getting the correct answers, they assumed they had it also and selectively chose the more favorable parts of their results for publication. The idea was they knew what the answer had to be so they just had to be selective in choosing data so they would be with the successful group.

When my paper was published showing the cause of the errors in the results, almost all of the compliant wall drag reduction efforts ended.

It appears to me that the AGW supporters are on a similar bandwagon. Initially the observation that the temperature had significantly increased (1 degree F) over the last 150 years, and the atmospheric CO2 content had increased significantly (over 30%) in the same period suggested a relationship. Previous analysis had indicated that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and could cause some temperature increase. The effort to show that the temperature rise rate and level was unusual was pushed by several scientists, and initially it looked as if this might be true. After many other scientists jumped on the bandwagon, because they assumed the hypothesis was valid, they then had a personal stake (funding, prestige) to support the claims. Later data and analysis seemed to show the temperature increase was a local period of global warming (GW), but did not have a dominant component of AGW. This threatened the whole structure of the AGW position, and as is typical when a paradigm shift threatens to occur, was met with considerable resistance. This was further exasperated by the political and social involvement that had started a major drive to cut man made greenhouse gas production, and at a very high cost to society.

Recent efforts by even well respected authors to publish papers that falsify claims of AGW have had great difficulty passing peer review, apparently because they went against the current paradigm, not because they were shown to be in error. The misuse of claims of support for AGW by “peer reviewed publications”, and rejection of analysis because it is not peer reviewed is often used to try to discredit the opposition. This is not how science is done. The facts should speak for themselves.

New technology is changing some of the older paradigms of communication, and use of electronic media now allows very rapid and sometimes real time interaction discussing material and presenting results. Paul Coppin stated in a response to a recent blog “Technical blogs are rapidly replacing the “letters” sections of formal journals as the place where a public airing of a journal article or topic takes place. The very nature of blogs also provides a means for the lay populace to look inside both the science and the process of the science. In the past this has been generally closed to common scrutiny. In particular, science writers have access to information and opinion they had to previous dig out or interview for”. This crossover of discussion will surely increase. Since the purpose of science is (supposed) to advance knowledge, the real time open interaction may actually do a better job than the normal peer review process for much (but not all) material. Formal publications still should be made when possible for unique data or concepts, but discussions of the consequences are probably better done in the electronic medium. One major purpose of the formal publication is getting the author credit for the material. There is not presently an equivalent way to archive and give credit for a publication on the web. There needs to be such a structure made available. The draft of a publication may be put on a web site and left open for review and comments. This might actually be a more effective peer review process for some types of papers since a wider audience has access to look for flaws. This may be done in conjunction with some formal peer reviewing. The corrected final paper then may be archived, but with continuous access to later catch overlooked problems.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD

Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD

Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share - Where the Truth Heats Up

Latest Forum Posts

Threads: 2106 | Replies: 840 | Views: 6292113
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English