Main Menu
Google Search
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

Science and Public Policy Institute

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis


» Shukla’s Gold

» Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20

» The “Blade” of Ocean2K

» The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”

» Op Ed on Deflategate

» Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?

» Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error

» Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline

» Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?

» Goodell and Deflategate Science



Global Warming News

» 2014: Lowest U.S. Severe Weather Death Toll in Ten Years

» Reports: Renewable Fuel Standard Imposes $22 Billion Ethanol Tax on Illinois, $42 Billion Tax on California

» Manchin Shoots Hole Through EPA Power Plant Rule

» NY AG Schneiderman vs. Peabody Energy: Climate Thuggery, Part 2

» NY Attorney General Schneiderman Targets Exxon Mobil: Climate Thuggery, Part 1

» Is War on Coal the Cause of Confounding Increase in U.S. Electricity Bills?

» Lomborg Exposes Paris Accord’s Climatological Insignificance

» A Positive EPA Platform for Presidential Hopefuls

» Antarctica: Still No Time to Sell the Beach House?

» Motion to Stay Nails Unlawfulness of EPA “Clean Power Plan”








More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.


»Pope, in Africa, lobbies on behalf of UN – Says failure of UN climate summit would be ‘catastrophic’
In a long address in Spanish at the United Nations regional office, Francis said it would be "catast ...
»Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry branded a ‘heretic’ for challenging ‘global warming’ – ‘I was tossed out of the tribe’
Curry: 'There’s no way I could get a government research grant to do the research I want to do ...
»​CBS News: ‘Should your turkey be taxed for climate change?’
»Emails Suggest Dem Sen. Whitehouse Is Behind The Effort To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
»Watch: Morano on Obama’s claim that UN summit will ‘rebuke’ ISIS: ‘Take that ISIS, we are going to hamstring our economies, limit our growth, kill our jobs’
Morano on Obama claiming a UN climate treaty will be a rebuke to ISIS: "Obama is essentially saying ...
»GLOBAL WARMING? NASA says Antarctic has been COOLING for past SIX years
»World facing ‘grave environmental crisis’, pope warns
»Predetermined: 2016 already declared ‘hottest year’
Reuters reports:
»Hollywood upset: Actor Mark Ruffalo: Obama ‘is almost worse than climate-change deniers’
New documentary challenges Obama
»Inhofe, leading climate change skeptic, may say ‘oui’ to Paris

Date published: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:00:28 +0000

»6″-10″ of Global Warming for Chicago, Detroit
Up to 20 million midwest U.S. residents are about to get some significant pre-Thanksgiving snowfall. ...
»Spencer Points Out Hypocrisy; Blogosphere & Twitterverse Explodes
There I was, minding my own business, just making some sarcastic remarks on Facebook alluding to the ...
»40 Years Ago Today: The Big Lake Never Gave Up Her Dead
Today is the 40th anniversary of the sinking of the Great Lakes freighter Edmund Fitzgerald, on Nove ...
»Atlantic Hurricanes Down 80% from 10 Years Ago
As the 2015 Atlantic hurricane season nears its end, and as we enter the 11th year without a major h ...
»Well Bam, There it Is: Exxon Mobil Investigated by NY Attorney General
I suppose this was inevitable, and Exxon Mobil probably expected it as well. According to the Justin ...
»Skiers Rejoice! Up to 12 ft. of Snow Expected in the West
A series of Pacific storms mixed with some cold Canadian air is expected to result in up to 12 feet ...
»Models vs. Observations: Plotting a Conspiracy?
John Christy and I received an email today from Marcel Crok, who presented our satellite observation ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for October 2015: +0.43 deg. C
NOTE: This is the seventh monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ol ...
»Color Satellite Shows Texas Floodwaters Entering the Gulf
Most of the rain that fell on southeast Texas (up to 20 inches) will end up flowing into the Gulf of ...
»Patricia’s Tight Blue Eye
As Hyper-Hurricane Patricia approaches the western coast of Mexico with 190 mph sustained winds, sat ...

Date published: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:03:47 +0000

»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...

Date published: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:04 +0000

»China Burns Much More Coal Than Thought, Complicates COP21
New York Times BEIJING — China, the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases from coal, has been ...
»World’s bishops appeal to COP 21 delegates for ‘just and legally binding’ climate deal
National Catholic Reporter. The world’s bishops have a clear message for world leaders set, in barel ...
»Did A ‘Green’ Millionaire Persuade Sen. Ayotte To Support EPA’s Global Warming Rule?
By Michael Bastasch, Daily Caller EPA published a finalized version of its global warming rule in th ...
»France’s top weatherman sparks storm over book questioning climate change
By Henry Samuel, Telegraph Philippe Verdier, weather chief at France Televisions, the country ...
»Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
By Michael Bastasch – The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate sci ...

Date published: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:59:32 +0000

»Shukla’s Gold
Roger Pielke Jr recently made the remarkable discovery that, in addition to his university salary fr ...
»Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20
The RICO-20 gang of climate academics commenced its supposed campaign against misinformation with fa ...
»The “Blade” of Ocean2K
I’ve had a longstanding interest in high-resolution ocean proxies (with posts as early as 2005 ...
»The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”
The long-awaited (and long overdue) PAGES2K synthesis of 57 high-resolution ocean sediment series (O ...
»Op Ed on Deflategate
In Financial Post here. My submitted version was a little harsher. #deflategate For related blog pos ...
»Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?
In today’s post,  I’m going to show the Deflategate data from a new perspective.   Rathe ...
»Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error
On June 29, I sent a letter to Ted Wells, notifying him of the erroneous description of key figures ...
»Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline
In an earlier article,  I pointed out that essential figures in the Exponent report contained (what ...
»Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?
The transcript of the Brady appeal before Goodell has been released and it’s astonishing to se ...
»Goodell and Deflategate Science
Yesterday, Roger Goodell released his decision on the Brady appeal. Most of the early discussion has ...

Date published: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:44:02 +0000

Date published: not known

»GreenLeft ALPABC confirms that blocking Australian coal exports will lead to an increase in global carbon dioxide emissions
Interesting example of the facts of the matter eventually making it into the light. Credit where cre ...
»Syria rain history – I think they have other problems
Like many I noticed Prince Charles repeating the claim that climate change is responsible for the ri ...
»Is there a more pointlessly stupid Govt decision than leasing the Port of Darwin for 99 years?
Last month – Giles announces Port of Darwin leased for 99 years for $506 million – now ...
»Andrew Bolt was too critical of President Obama on his “The Bolt Report” TV show this morning
The exact point I want to make is that Andrew in his “The Panel” segment, was critical o ...
»Is this the best way to locate a needed nuclear waste storage facility ?
The ABC reports – Six sites shortlisted for Australia’s first nuclear waste dump; Govern ...
»BoM rain Outlook for Nov 2015 fails comprehensively in six days
Issued only on 29th October – the BoM rain Outlook for November crashed and burnt by the time ...
»New book – Australia’s Defence by David Archibald
David has sent me a 7.4MB 108 page pdf – great reading – many comparisons between the F- ...
»Hello El Nino rain – useful and crop saving in some places
There were areas of useful rain in NSW Qld too in the last week of October. 48hrs of rain dot maps a ...
»David Archibald writes in Quadrant on the possibility of conflict in the South China Sea
China’s Implacable Belligerence – All I can say is that if China wants war with the USA and ot ...
»Mining Engineer lays complaints to University of Queensland about the behaviour of staff related to climate issues
Read all about it – set out with crystal clarity at the website of Malcolm Roberts.

Date published: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:54:33 +0000
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
If you want to recover lost iPhone notes from iPho[more ...]
11/25 09:31

Posted by Anonymous
You may accidently deleted iPhone data and want to[more ...]
11/25 09:26

Posted by Anonymous
I recover sms from iPhone 5S with data recovery so[more ...]
11/20 08:20

Posted by JessonBill
Hi, Can I recover deleted text messages from iPhon[more ...]
11/07 19:00

Posted by Jesson Liu
Hey, do you folks know how to recoup erased photog[more ...]
11/07 18:58

Posted by Anonymous The insurance vendor w[more ...]
11/03 00:29

Posted by Anonymous The exposure will pay f[more ...]
11/03 00:28

Posted by Anonymous The rear seats[more ...]
11/03 00:27

Posted by Anonymous Certain Student ca[more ...]
11/03 00:26

Posted by Anonymous
Certain Student cards can perform students price r[more ...]
11/03 00:25

Relevant Sponsors

Any Amount helps support improvements

* or *

Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Sunday 07 June 2009 - 21:51:28 // comment: 43 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

Most everyone knows the classic definition of peer review, "the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field". But do you know how the process actually works? Dr. Weinstein does; he has been on both ends of the process. No Longer Supported
Often times, the ones performing the peer review are friends or close colleagues of the original author. Furthermore, if anyone were to come out of the woodwork and debunk anthropogenic global warming, it would dry up that seemingly infinite sea of funding they were receiving. In fact, the "Piltdown Man" hoax, where the skull of a "missing link" was created by combining the jawbone of an orangutan with a human skull by fame-craving scientists, went on for over 40 years because of lack of true, proper scientific scrutiny. They were so anxious to prove evolution that they were blinded in their observations. Dr. Weinstein reveals in this article how many scientists today may also be blinded in the peer review process by the temptations of funding, prestige, and possibly even the sheer peer pressure that occurs within the scientific community.

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue
Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 29, 2009

Monographs, books, technical papers, white papers, and other forms of published material that are to be widely disseminated should ideally be examined by independent reviewers (generally called peer reviewers) with reasonable knowledge of the subject area. The reviewer may or may not be as expert in the details of the subject as the author, but should be at least generally expert in a broader overlapping field. Frequently papers have material that covers more than one subject area and people within a narrow field may do poorly reviewing the broader subject. It is frequently best to have some reviewers that are knowledgeable people but not as close to the narrow field as the author, for a more independent and broader coverage.

The reviews, possibly resulting in suggested changes, do not assure the final material is correct. The lack of a review also does not mean the results are not correct and clear. It just increases the chance for errors to slip through.

If the paper is very complex or has numerous references, it may not be possible to do as good a review as desired in a reasonable time unless the reviewer is intimately familiar with the work. These reviews are often done within a small group of experts, who may even have collaborated on each others papers. The members of the overly narrow review group may have evolved toward a common understanding on the subject, and if the understanding is not correct, almost all of the limited number of experts in that field may make common mistakes that outside reviewers may not make. However, a reviewer outside that group may not be expert enough to be fully on top of the material. This is a problem without a clear solution, especially in fields with a limited number of experts. There are also occasions when errors in assumptions used in developing equations, or in interpretation of instrumentation result in erroneous conclusions that are repeated in many papers until the error is caught and corrected. For this reason all papers must be considered suspect until history vindicates or falsifies them. A paradigm shift on a subject may result from these types of errors being corrected at later times.

An example of the problems that may arise with peer-reviewed papers occurred on a project that I worked on for several years. The branch I was working with was examining possible methods to reduce turbulent skin friction over surfaces, with the goal of reducing aircraft and ship drag, and thus save fuel. We had developed several successful concepts that gave small but useful reductions in drag. These included “longitudinal microgrooves”, “large eddy breakup devices”, and for water flow, “air bubbles in longitudinal grooves”. An additional concept we worked on was a “compliant wall”. This last method appeared to be particularly promising as a method to damp out near wall turbulence by absorbing wall pressure fluctuations. Unlike the other methods, this last technique required a soft and movable wall, so it was more difficult to measure the drag of a test object. Several other groups all over the world also started work on this concept (bandwagon effect), and our group (and many of the other groups) obtained what we thought were favorable results in several tests. Dozens of peer-reviewed papers were published in main line journals (e.g., Journal of Fluid Physics, AIAA journal, etc.). The main experimental technique used to measure the drag for this type of model was a hot-wire Reynolds stress probe. Test results seemed to indicate a large reduction in drag. In order to independently verify the favorable result obtained with this technique, I designed and had built a large sensitive drag balance to directly measure the drag on a panel model. The direct measurement did not show the reduction in drag indicated by the hot wire probe. After much analysis, I found the cause of the problem. Reynolds stress drag measurements are proxy drag measurements. They are related to the drag under some special assumptions. In this case the critical assumption was that all of the vertical motion energy in the boundary layer was due to turbulent flow, and stayed in the boundary layer. It turned out that with a compliant wall, the flexible wall motion induced a vertical motion pressure wave that propagated as sound out of the boundary layer, so the required assumption was not valid.

Many of the other favorable tests had used the same type of probe with the same false positive result. Those that did not use the hot wire often gave results that were confusing, but many still passed peer review. It appears that since some of the other papers seemed to be getting the correct answers, they assumed they had it also and selectively chose the more favorable parts of their results for publication. The idea was they knew what the answer had to be so they just had to be selective in choosing data so they would be with the successful group.

When my paper was published showing the cause of the errors in the results, almost all of the compliant wall drag reduction efforts ended.

It appears to me that the AGW supporters are on a similar bandwagon. Initially the observation that the temperature had significantly increased (1 degree F) over the last 150 years, and the atmospheric CO2 content had increased significantly (over 30%) in the same period suggested a relationship. Previous analysis had indicated that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and could cause some temperature increase. The effort to show that the temperature rise rate and level was unusual was pushed by several scientists, and initially it looked as if this might be true. After many other scientists jumped on the bandwagon, because they assumed the hypothesis was valid, they then had a personal stake (funding, prestige) to support the claims. Later data and analysis seemed to show the temperature increase was a local period of global warming (GW), but did not have a dominant component of AGW. This threatened the whole structure of the AGW position, and as is typical when a paradigm shift threatens to occur, was met with considerable resistance. This was further exasperated by the political and social involvement that had started a major drive to cut man made greenhouse gas production, and at a very high cost to society.

Recent efforts by even well respected authors to publish papers that falsify claims of AGW have had great difficulty passing peer review, apparently because they went against the current paradigm, not because they were shown to be in error. The misuse of claims of support for AGW by “peer reviewed publications”, and rejection of analysis because it is not peer reviewed is often used to try to discredit the opposition. This is not how science is done. The facts should speak for themselves.

New technology is changing some of the older paradigms of communication, and use of electronic media now allows very rapid and sometimes real time interaction discussing material and presenting results. Paul Coppin stated in a response to a recent blog “Technical blogs are rapidly replacing the “letters” sections of formal journals as the place where a public airing of a journal article or topic takes place. The very nature of blogs also provides a means for the lay populace to look inside both the science and the process of the science. In the past this has been generally closed to common scrutiny. In particular, science writers have access to information and opinion they had to previous dig out or interview for”. This crossover of discussion will surely increase. Since the purpose of science is (supposed) to advance knowledge, the real time open interaction may actually do a better job than the normal peer review process for much (but not all) material. Formal publications still should be made when possible for unique data or concepts, but discussions of the consequences are probably better done in the electronic medium. One major purpose of the formal publication is getting the author credit for the material. There is not presently an equivalent way to archive and give credit for a publication on the web. There needs to be such a structure made available. The draft of a publication may be put on a web site and left open for review and comments. This might actually be a more effective peer review process for some types of papers since a wider audience has access to look for flaws. This may be done in conjunction with some formal peer reviewing. The corrected final paper then may be archived, but with continuous access to later catch overlooked problems.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD

Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD

Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share - Where the Truth Heats Up

Latest Forum Posts

Threads: 2114 | Replies: 854 | Views: 6394088
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English