Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***
Science and Public Policy Institute

***
Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Ruling out high deflation scenarios

» Exponent’s Transients: Bodge or Botch?

» NFL Officials Over-Inflated Patriot Balls

» More on Deflategate

» Deflategate and Errors in the Wells Report

» Implications of recent multimodel attribution studies for climate sensitivity

» Scientific American article: “How to Misinterpret Climate Change Research”

» Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 3

» Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 2

» Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 1

***
Watts Up With That?

» Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #186

» The Pope’s Encyclical Exposes Real Agenda Behind Global Warming

» Climate concerns fading, despite Paris hype

» 2°C or not 2°C–that is the question

» An Ecologist’s Perspective on Pope Francis’s Encyclical Letter

» Oddly, ‘Nobel prize winner’ Michael Mann was not invited to sign The Mainau Declaration for climate protection

» A sad commentary on global warming alarmism: Science says one thing, scientists another

» That Didn’t Take Long: North & South Carolina Shark Attacks Blamed on Global Warming

» New Pew Center study finds global warming to be a mostly political issue

» El Niño begins to curtail the Pause

» When EPA worries about regulating puddles, it has gone too far

» One-sided science ignores the fact that ‘Sea ice is not a stable habitat for polar bears’

***
Global Warming News

» IER Study: Existing Coal Much Less Costly than New Gas, Wind

» EPA’s Climate Action Flim-Flam Report

» Why the Ratepayer Protection Act Is Worthy

» Computer-Aided Sophistry: My Power Point on the Social Cost of Carbon

» Sowing Local Opposition to COP-21 in Paris

» Pope Francis’s Climate Encyclical: Help Poor People by Dismantling Industrial Civilization

» How to Rebut the Coming Wave of Tasteless Green TV Ads Defending Congress’s Bipartisan Effort to Check EPA (BONUS BLOGS: “Niskanen Center’s Unreasonable Case for Carbon Tax” & “Progressives’ Insincere Response to Pope”)

» Does EPA’s Clean Power Plan Endanger Manatees?

» Renewable Fuel Standard: Can EPA Regulate America Beyond the ‘Blend Wall’?

» Cooler Heads Digest 12 June 2015

***
Fox News - Climate Change Stories

***
Michelle Malkin - Enviro-Nitwits

» Going green: Obama and Bill Nye’s Earth Day fuel-fry cost taxpayers a cool million

» Holy hypocrisy and hot air

» EPA chief wants to help ‘climate deniers’ be ‘normal’

» Friday lunacy dump: Obama admin says EPA’s new truck emission regs will make shipping costs go down

» G7 agrees to control earth’s temperature but remains split on if Superman could beat up Batman

***
DailyTech Michael Asher`s blog

» Will the Real Antarctica Please Stand Up?

» Global Warming May Decrease Hurricanes, Research Suggests

» Japanese Report Disputes Human Cause for Global Warming

» Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979

» A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the (Climate) Forum

» Climate Report Downgrades Ice Loss; Media Reports Opposite

» Princeton Physicist Calls Global Warming Science "Mistaken"

» Defying Predictions, Sea Level Rise Begins to Slow

» Electric Car Sales in Freefall; Industry Risks Collapse

» Glaciers in Norway Growing Again

***
C3 - Climate Cycles Change

***
CATO - Global Warming

» Will the Supreme Court Save America from the 'Greek Disease?'

» Washington's Role in Puerto Rico's Mess

» The Other Danger of a 'Grexit'

» Republicans Amid Changing Opinions on Social Issues

» It's Time for the Blaine Amendment to Go

» Toss South Korea off America's Defense Dole: Presidents Obama and Park Should End Military Welfare

» Government Debt: Jefferson and Gallatin Were Right

» Uber Execs Arrested in France after Luddite Protests

» Export-Import Bank Closes: Kill Subsidies to Cut Federal Liabilities, Promote Economic Fairness

» Why US Allies Are Happy to Join China's AIIB

» Generous with Someone Else's Money

» Greece, Euro Stagger toward the Brink: How Will It all End?

» How Many More Greek Tragedies?

» The New Front in the Global War on Drugs

» Six Humpty Dumptys Playing Calvinball

» Scalia's Obamacare Argument Is Stronger than Roberts'

» Top Dozen Villains in Greek Soap Opera: Who Is to Blame as Greece and Euro Stagger toward the Brink?

» Justice John Roberts's Obamacare Decision Is an Orwellian Mess

» Taper Talk, and the $10 Bill

» Libertarians Have Long Led the Way on Marriage

» Shortcomings Undercut Message of Encyclical

» Disclosure Rules Are the Wrong Way to Push Social Change

» How China and the United States Can Learn to Get Along

» Washington Confronts Russia over Ukraine: Yet Europeans Won't Protect Themselves from Vladimir Putin

» The New Saudi-Russian Axis: Should America Worry?

***
CanadaFreePress - Global Warming

***
More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Jane Fonda sounds climate alarm: ‘The climate change problem is the issue of our civilization’
»Dr. Bill Gray Responds To Pope Francis – ‘Unwise and Should Not Be Acted Upon’
»An Ecologist’s Perspective on Pope Francis’s Encyclical Letter
»Arctic Sea Ice At Highest Extent Since 2005
»Warmists Guilt Trip Americans Over Fourth of July picnics – ‘Firing up grills dumps up to 882 million pounds of carbon pollution into the atmosphere’
'When Americans fire up their grills on Independence Day, they'll dump up to 882 million pounds of c ...
»Watch: Gov. Chris Christie: ‘I am not a scientist. But I do know that climate change is happening’
Flahsback: Climate Depot’s Round Up of GOP Gov. Chris Christie’s global warming promotion - Christie ...
»NY Times: Cuba’s Communism Was Good For The Environment
»New paper shows N. Greenland was warmer during the early 20th century (1920-1940) & during Medieval Warm Period
»‘Pope’s encyclical on climate change ignores how markets & technology have lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty’
»‘Weather related deaths had fallen 98% due to the protection of fossil fuels’


Date published: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 03:22:42 +0000
Details

»The Greek Tragedy: Will We Heed the Warning?
Caution: For those who think I should stick to science, turn your eyes away now. When my daughter st ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for June, 2015: +0.31 deg. C
NOTE: This is the third monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the old ...
»Can Infrared Radiation Warm a Water Body? Part II
(This is a follow-up to my post from a little over a year ago, but with some exprimental results). I ...
»Smoke Pouring into U.S from Canadian Wildfires
Portions of up to ten plains states are covered by smoke this morning from hundreds of wildfires now ...
»Alaska On Fire: Satellite Views 260+ Wildfires
An unusually warm and dry spring has led to widespread wildfire activity in Alaska, with over 260 wi ...
»Auroras Seen as Far South as Georgia and Arkansas
The severe geomagnetic storm late yesterday produced rare auroras seen as far south as Georgia and A ...
»2015 Will Be Record Warm in Surface Temperatures…But Still Below Model Forecasts
With 5/12 (41.7%) of the votes counted, John Christy and I are now prepared to call 2015 as the winn ...
»Stossel’s “Science Wars”, Tomorrow 8 p.m. EDT on Fox Business
I’ll be on tommorow’s Stossel Show (Fox Business Channel, 8 p.m. EDT Friday), where John ...
»NASA Satellite Reveals Guadalupe Island Glory
Anyone who has traveled on airplanes a lot has probably seen the glory (or halo) phenomenon when loo ...
»TRMM Satellite Reentering the Atmosphere Tonight
NASA’s very successful Tropical Rain Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite will mostly burn up up ...


Date published: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:22:42 +0000
Details

»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at Forbes.com called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...
»Switching Back to Disqus
For a variety of reasons, I had to turn off Disqus a while back.  We are going back to it for commen ...


Date published: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:37:18 +0000
Details

»China cracks down on environmental protection, arrests thousands suspected of environmental crimes
By Becca Stanek China is getting serious about protecting the environment and expects its citizens t ...
»IPCC Ignores its Own Findings on Stratospheric Cooling
Written by Steven Capozzola The IPCC claims that stratospheric cooling disproves solar-driven warmin ...
»Global Climate Scam: An Interview with Lord Christopher Monckton
Lord Christopher Monckton is interviewed on Canadian television about climate change hysteria and it ...
»Senator: Use RICO Laws to Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
By Mark Hemingway,  WeeklyStandard Writing in the Washington Post, Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democratic ...
»EPA Biofuel Policy In Shambles, So It Mandates More Ethanol
Despite complaints from the oil industry, livestock producers, environmental groups and a whole host ...


Date published: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:11:06 +0000
Details

»Ruling out high deflation scenarios
Further to my series of posts on Deflategate, reader chrimony observed that my statistical analysis ...
»Exponent’s Transients: Bodge or Botch?
In my first writeup, I observed that Exponent’s Logo transients appeared to be bodged too high ...
»NFL Officials Over-Inflated Patriot Balls
One of the ironies of the NFL’s conduct in this affair is that it can be established that NFL ...
»More on Deflategate
By converting football pressures to ball temperatures under the Ideal Gas Law, it is possible to con ...
»Deflategate and Errors in the Wells Report
Readers in the U.S. are doubtless aware of the “Deflategate scandal”, in which the NFL a ...
»Implications of recent multimodel attribution studies for climate sensitivity
Last year, a paper of mine (Lewis 2014) showing that the approach used in Frame et al (2005), which ...
»Scientific American article: “How to Misinterpret Climate Change Research”
A Scientific American article concerning Bjorn Stevens’ recent paper “Rethinking the low ...
»Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 3
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis In Part 1 I introduced the talk I gave at Ringberg 2015, explained wh ...
»Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 2
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis In Part 1 I introduced the talk I gave at Ringberg 2015, explained wh ...
»Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 1
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis As many readers will be aware, I attended the WCRP Grand Challenge Wo ...


Date published: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 04:14:02 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Two examples of left-wing math
There has been a poll in Canberra to test public opinion for a GreenLabor Govt proposed light rail o ...
»Marshall Islands foreign minister Tony de Brum claims “…yet another cyclone. Climate change has arrived,” he tweeted.
The ABC reports – Chaotic unseasonal storms strike Marshall Islands and Guam as eight systems ...
»Brave pilot has Solar Impulse aircraft only 700km from Hawaii
Nearly four and a half days out of Nagoya – fascinating marriage of Solar PV and aeronautical ...
»Wall collapse at Lithgow coal mine said to be ‘equivalent to a giant oil spill’
The ABC reports – Collapse at Clarence Colliery at Lithgow ‘equivalent to giant oil spil ...
»Australian BoM claim that Perth has had the warmest June ever is not true everywhere around Perth
Keen eyed readers warned me of this news – Warmest June temperatures for Perth Working down th ...
»Australian BoM names Raquel as their first ever recorded July cyclone – but BoM memories are faulty
The BoM has said that a tropical low north east of the Solomons might develop into a tropical cyclon ...
»Lone Wolf Day – four attacks in one day
First we heard of France – France attack: Man decapitated at factory near Lyon then Tunisia ...
»UK Met Office says that the activity of our sun is in decline but that any cooling will be swamped by global warming
I note the abstract of their paper – Regional climate impacts of a possible future grand solar ...
»New Zealand hottest ever day in February 1973 arrived directly from Australian heatwave
After being pointed to a NIWA page of NZ climate extremes I saw that the hottest ever day in NZ was ...
»BBC reports the Kurds have captured the Islamic State held town of Ain Issa just north of IS HQ Raqqa
Islamic State conflict: Kurds ‘capture Syrian town north of Raqqa’ Lets just hope the Ku ...


Date published: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 01:37:36 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
Very good digestive tract wellbeing = bodily healt[more ...]
06/21 05:40

Posted by Anonymous
[quote][quote]You put certainly revolutionary idea[more ...]
05/14 11:08

Posted by Anonymous
Anonymous wrote ...You put certainly revolutionary[more ...]
05/12 23:28

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:27

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:25

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:24

Posted by Anonymous
You put certainly revolutionary ideas in the post.[more ...]
05/12 06:06

Posted by Michael Bay
Have you guys ever considered the fact that maybe [more ...]
05/04 12:00

Posted by Anonymous
S L U T
05/04 11:22

Posted by Anonymous
[censored]
05/04 11:17

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Sunday 07 June 2009 - 21:51:28 // comment: 43 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

Most everyone knows the classic definition of peer review, "the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field". But do you know how the process actually works? Dr. Weinstein does; he has been on both ends of the process. No Longer Supported
Often times, the ones performing the peer review are friends or close colleagues of the original author. Furthermore, if anyone were to come out of the woodwork and debunk anthropogenic global warming, it would dry up that seemingly infinite sea of funding they were receiving. In fact, the "Piltdown Man" hoax, where the skull of a "missing link" was created by combining the jawbone of an orangutan with a human skull by fame-craving scientists, went on for over 40 years because of lack of true, proper scientific scrutiny. They were so anxious to prove evolution that they were blinded in their observations. Dr. Weinstein reveals in this article how many scientists today may also be blinded in the peer review process by the temptations of funding, prestige, and possibly even the sheer peer pressure that occurs within the scientific community.





Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue
Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 29, 2009




Monographs, books, technical papers, white papers, and other forms of published material that are to be widely disseminated should ideally be examined by independent reviewers (generally called peer reviewers) with reasonable knowledge of the subject area. The reviewer may or may not be as expert in the details of the subject as the author, but should be at least generally expert in a broader overlapping field. Frequently papers have material that covers more than one subject area and people within a narrow field may do poorly reviewing the broader subject. It is frequently best to have some reviewers that are knowledgeable people but not as close to the narrow field as the author, for a more independent and broader coverage.

The reviews, possibly resulting in suggested changes, do not assure the final material is correct. The lack of a review also does not mean the results are not correct and clear. It just increases the chance for errors to slip through.

If the paper is very complex or has numerous references, it may not be possible to do as good a review as desired in a reasonable time unless the reviewer is intimately familiar with the work. These reviews are often done within a small group of experts, who may even have collaborated on each others papers. The members of the overly narrow review group may have evolved toward a common understanding on the subject, and if the understanding is not correct, almost all of the limited number of experts in that field may make common mistakes that outside reviewers may not make. However, a reviewer outside that group may not be expert enough to be fully on top of the material. This is a problem without a clear solution, especially in fields with a limited number of experts. There are also occasions when errors in assumptions used in developing equations, or in interpretation of instrumentation result in erroneous conclusions that are repeated in many papers until the error is caught and corrected. For this reason all papers must be considered suspect until history vindicates or falsifies them. A paradigm shift on a subject may result from these types of errors being corrected at later times.

An example of the problems that may arise with peer-reviewed papers occurred on a project that I worked on for several years. The branch I was working with was examining possible methods to reduce turbulent skin friction over surfaces, with the goal of reducing aircraft and ship drag, and thus save fuel. We had developed several successful concepts that gave small but useful reductions in drag. These included “longitudinal microgrooves”, “large eddy breakup devices”, and for water flow, “air bubbles in longitudinal grooves”. An additional concept we worked on was a “compliant wall”. This last method appeared to be particularly promising as a method to damp out near wall turbulence by absorbing wall pressure fluctuations. Unlike the other methods, this last technique required a soft and movable wall, so it was more difficult to measure the drag of a test object. Several other groups all over the world also started work on this concept (bandwagon effect), and our group (and many of the other groups) obtained what we thought were favorable results in several tests. Dozens of peer-reviewed papers were published in main line journals (e.g., Journal of Fluid Physics, AIAA journal, etc.). The main experimental technique used to measure the drag for this type of model was a hot-wire Reynolds stress probe. Test results seemed to indicate a large reduction in drag. In order to independently verify the favorable result obtained with this technique, I designed and had built a large sensitive drag balance to directly measure the drag on a panel model. The direct measurement did not show the reduction in drag indicated by the hot wire probe. After much analysis, I found the cause of the problem. Reynolds stress drag measurements are proxy drag measurements. They are related to the drag under some special assumptions. In this case the critical assumption was that all of the vertical motion energy in the boundary layer was due to turbulent flow, and stayed in the boundary layer. It turned out that with a compliant wall, the flexible wall motion induced a vertical motion pressure wave that propagated as sound out of the boundary layer, so the required assumption was not valid.

Many of the other favorable tests had used the same type of probe with the same false positive result. Those that did not use the hot wire often gave results that were confusing, but many still passed peer review. It appears that since some of the other papers seemed to be getting the correct answers, they assumed they had it also and selectively chose the more favorable parts of their results for publication. The idea was they knew what the answer had to be so they just had to be selective in choosing data so they would be with the successful group.

When my paper was published showing the cause of the errors in the results, almost all of the compliant wall drag reduction efforts ended.

It appears to me that the AGW supporters are on a similar bandwagon. Initially the observation that the temperature had significantly increased (1 degree F) over the last 150 years, and the atmospheric CO2 content had increased significantly (over 30%) in the same period suggested a relationship. Previous analysis had indicated that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and could cause some temperature increase. The effort to show that the temperature rise rate and level was unusual was pushed by several scientists, and initially it looked as if this might be true. After many other scientists jumped on the bandwagon, because they assumed the hypothesis was valid, they then had a personal stake (funding, prestige) to support the claims. Later data and analysis seemed to show the temperature increase was a local period of global warming (GW), but did not have a dominant component of AGW. This threatened the whole structure of the AGW position, and as is typical when a paradigm shift threatens to occur, was met with considerable resistance. This was further exasperated by the political and social involvement that had started a major drive to cut man made greenhouse gas production, and at a very high cost to society.

Recent efforts by even well respected authors to publish papers that falsify claims of AGW have had great difficulty passing peer review, apparently because they went against the current paradigm, not because they were shown to be in error. The misuse of claims of support for AGW by “peer reviewed publications”, and rejection of analysis because it is not peer reviewed is often used to try to discredit the opposition. This is not how science is done. The facts should speak for themselves.

New technology is changing some of the older paradigms of communication, and use of electronic media now allows very rapid and sometimes real time interaction discussing material and presenting results. Paul Coppin stated in a response to a recent blog “Technical blogs are rapidly replacing the “letters” sections of formal journals as the place where a public airing of a journal article or topic takes place. The very nature of blogs also provides a means for the lay populace to look inside both the science and the process of the science. In the past this has been generally closed to common scrutiny. In particular, science writers have access to information and opinion they had to previous dig out or interview for”. This crossover of discussion will surely increase. Since the purpose of science is (supposed) to advance knowledge, the real time open interaction may actually do a better job than the normal peer review process for much (but not all) material. Formal publications still should be made when possible for unique data or concepts, but discussions of the consequences are probably better done in the electronic medium. One major purpose of the formal publication is getting the author credit for the material. There is not presently an equivalent way to archive and give credit for a publication on the web. There needs to be such a structure made available. The draft of a publication may be put on a web site and left open for review and comments. This might actually be a more effective peer review process for some types of papers since a wider audience has access to look for flaws. This may be done in conjunction with some formal peer reviewing. The corrected final paper then may be archived, but with continuous access to later catch overlooked problems.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD




Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up





Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2106 | Replies: 834 | Views: 5812628
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English