Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***

***

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error

» Schmidt’s Histogram Diagram Doesn’t Refute Christy

» Gavin Schmidt and Reference Period “Trickery”

» Objective Bayesian parameter estimation: Incorporating prior information

» Marvel et al.: GISS did omit land use forcing

» Bayesian parameter estimation: Radiocarbon dating re-examined

» Gerry Browning: In Memory of Professor Heinz Kreiss

» Disappearing the MWP at Icefields, Alberta

» New Light on Gulf of Alaska

» Marvel et al. – Gavin Schmidt admits key error but disputes everything else

***

***

Global Warming News

» EPA Administrator Testifies before House Science Committee

» EPA’s PM2.5 Co-Benefits PR Trick Exposed

» More Good News on Climate

» House Panel Asks McCarthy: How Is EPA’s Continuing Implementation of the Clean Power Plan Legal under the Stay?

» Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds

» What Every Conservative in Congress Needs to Know about the Paris Agreement

» Paris Climate Agreement: What Should a Republican President Do?

» Carbon Capture and Storage: Adequately Demonstrated?

» Renewable Fuel Standard: Fact Checking RFA Chief Bob Dinneen

» Climate Bullies: Dems Ask S.E.C. to Target Shell

***

***


***


***


***


***


***

More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Warmist Eco-Author Spoke To AG About Global Warming Skeptics Before Exxon Reports
»‘The sun goes blank again during the weakest solar cycle in more than a century’
»Federal Energy Lab Forced To Close After ‘Disturbing’ Data Manipulation – ‘Tell me what you want and I will get it for you’
The inorganic section of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in Lakew ...
»Brexit is also a repudiation of EU ‘global warming’ mandates – 69‰ saw ‘green movement’ as a ‘force for ill’
UK Poll: 69 percent of those who voted to leave the EU saw the 'green movement' as a 'force for ill. ...
»Will we see a climate skeptic as British Prime Minister?
»Climate Activists Admit They’ve Been Working with NY AG on Climate RICO Campaign for Over a Year
»U.S. states, Rockefellers clash with U.S. House panel on Exxon climate probes
»Trump Needs Help To Stay The Course On Climate Change – Lessons from Canada
»Alex Epstein: ‘Defend the Right to Free Speech Against Climate Fascism’
»UN boss: Brexit may mean rewriting Paris Agreement on climate change


Date published: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:36:04 +0000
Details

»2016 Will Likely See Record Global Warmth in Satellite Data
…but the approaching La Nina might extend the global warming pause to 20 years. Even though gl ...
»If Skeptics can be Prosecuted for Fraud, So can Alarmists
I’m glad to see this news report today, and I’ve been saying the same thing ever since t ...
»No, Spencer’s Research Wasn’t Funded by Peabody
My vacation this week was interrupted this morning by some hate e-mail…apparently, the recent ...
»Another Potential Reason Why Climate Sensitivity is Over-Estimated
BACKGROUND It’s been quite a while since I’ve discussed why the diagnosis of feedbacks i ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for May, 2016: +0.55 deg. C
NOTE: This is the fourteenth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ...
»UAH V6 Global Temperature Update for April, 2016: +0.71 deg. C
NOTE: This is the thirteenth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ...
»William Gray, Hurricane Researcher and Skeptic, Dead at 86
I just learned through Climate Depot and Tony Heller that Bill Gray has died. Bill was a pioneering ...
»Why Gavin Schmidt’s Temperature Plot Baseline Issue is Irrelevant
Ever since we started posting global temperature comparisons between models and observations there h ...
»UPDATE: It Did Not Snow in Guadeloupe
On April Fools day (April 1), there was a report of snow on the tropical island of Guadeloupe on the ...
»Crops at Risk: Will This Week Equal the $2 Billion Freeze of 2007?
Exactly 9 years ago this week, the eastern U.S. was plunged into below-freezing weather after an unu ...


Date published: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:49:25 +0000
Details

»My Climate Plan, Wherein a Climate Skeptic Actually Advocates for A Carbon Tax
I am always amazed at how people like to draw conclusions about what I write merely from the title, ...
»Come See My Climate Talk on Wednesday Evening, February 24, at Claremont-McKenna College
I am speaking on Wednesday night at the Athenaeum at Claremont-McKenna College near Pomona on Wednes ...
»US Average Temperature Trends in Context
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. There was some debate a while back around about a temperature chart so ...
»Revisiting (Yet Again) Hansen’s 1998 Forecast on Global Warming to Congress
I want to briefly revisit Hansen’s 1998 Congressional forecast.  Yes, I and many others have c ...
»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...


Date published: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:20:20 +0000
Details

»Trump-ing Hillary on EPA and Global Warming
By Steve Milloy, Breitbart.com If he lives up to his campaign rhetoric, a President Donald Trump wou ...
»Jimmy Kimmel: Totally F**king Wrong on Climate Change
By James Delingpole, Breitbart.com Jimmy Kimmel is great. Probably the most relaxed, amiable, and fu ...
»Obama’s Violating the Constitution by Not Submitting Climate Treaty to Senate
The Daily Signal Today at United Nations Headquarters in New York City, Secretary of State John Kerr ...
»Climate Hustle Coming to Theaters on May 2, The Debate is Just Beginning
By Elmer Beauregard I had the privilege of going to D.C. to see the Premiere of Climate Hustle last ...
»‘Climate Hustle’ goes to DC: Skeptical film to premiere on Capitol Hill
Riveting panel with Gov. Sarah Palin and other guests (March 31, 2016) The U.S. premiere of CFACT’s ...


Date published: Thu, 05 May 2016 20:12:47 +0000
Details

»Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error
I’ve submitted an article entitled “New Light on Deflategate: Critical Technical Errors ...
»Schmidt’s Histogram Diagram Doesn’t Refute Christy
In my most recent post,  I discussed yet another incident in the long running dispute about the inco ...
»Gavin Schmidt and Reference Period “Trickery”
In the past few weeks, I’ve been re-examining the long-standing dispute over the discrepancy b ...
»Objective Bayesian parameter estimation: Incorporating prior information
A guest article by Nic Lewis Introduction In a recent article I discussed Bayesian parameter inferen ...
»Marvel et al.: GISS did omit land use forcing
A guest article by Nic Lewis I reported in a previous post, here, a number of serious problems that ...
»Bayesian parameter estimation: Radiocarbon dating re-examined
A guest article by Nic Lewis Introduction In April 2014 I published a guest article about statistica ...
»Gerry Browning: In Memory of Professor Heinz Kreiss
Gerry Browning writes: The Correct System of Equations for Climate and Weather Models The system of ...
»Disappearing the MWP at Icefields, Alberta
In today’s post, I’m going to critically examine another widely used tree ring chronolog ...
»New Light on Gulf of Alaska
Last week, I posted on the effect of ex post site selection on the Gulf of Alaska tree ring chronolo ...
»Marvel et al. – Gavin Schmidt admits key error but disputes everything else
A guest article by Nicholas Lewis Introduction Gavin Schmidt has finally provided, at the GISS websi ...


Date published: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:56:46 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Will we see a climate sceptic as British Prime Minister?
The marvellous Brexit news and PM Cameron’s plan to resign leaves Boris Johnson as the ...
»15sec TV commercial that Australian Liberty Alliance can not get on TV
Censorship takes many forms. The TV ad you’re not allowed to see – ALA on FaceBook
»Tasmanian power exports via Basslink in Dec 2015 were triggered by Victorian price signals
I should have included this price graphic in my March blog – Tasmanian electricity crisis expl ...
»Australian Prime Minister does something right – says to put the Greens last
Election 2016: Malcolm Turnbull says placing Greens last in voting preferences in ‘national in ...
»Rival thermal solar power plants proposed for Port Augusta
Taxpayers should be watching their hip pockets. Concentrated Solar (CS) proposals for the Port Augus ...
»Surge in wholesale electricity prices last week
Peter Bobroff who runs the AusGrid PublicKnowledge website – alerted me to the increase in the ...
»Credit where due to BoM forecasting
Weather warning: East coast low brings flash flooding, strong winds and damaging surf – BoM cu ...
»Cartoon skewers issue to perfection
Seen at MichaelSmithNews.Com Thanks Michael. Vote 1ALA – always put Greens last
»BP Energy Outlook sees no decrease in Chinese coal use to 2035
Contrary to main stream meedja BS I have heard over last 12 months. Download 98 page pdf Little chan ...
»Exactly why wind power is too often useless
After posting the submission by Tony from Oz re Queensland Govt plans for 50% renewables by 2030 ...


Date published: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 02:04:46 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Source
[quote]It's just the way I like it. Get over it No[more ...]
06/25 04:44

Posted by Anonymous
It's just the way I like it. Get over it No need t[more ...]
06/25 04:42

Posted by Anonymous
Really great post, Thank you for sharing this know[more ...]
06/15 01:46

Posted by Anonymous
You can use the Samsung Data Recovery software to[more ...]
05/26 03:46

Posted by Anonymous
You can get the help of Android Data Recovery, whi[more ...]
05/26 03:44

Posted by Anonymous
Android Data Recovery software will help recover d[more ...]
05/26 03:40

Posted by Ben Green
Hi, there. Do you guys know how to get back lost p[more ...]
05/23 01:33

Posted by Anonymous
Have you ever met the problem about losing your fi[more ...]
05/19 01:56

Posted by Anonymous
Android Data Recovery is a professional and user-f[more ...]
05/19 01:51

Posted by Anonymous
Android Data Recoverycan help you get out of these[more ...]
05/19 01:48

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Sunday 07 June 2009 - 21:51:28 // comment: 43 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

Most everyone knows the classic definition of peer review, "the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field". But do you know how the process actually works? Dr. Weinstein does; he has been on both ends of the process. No Longer Supported
Often times, the ones performing the peer review are friends or close colleagues of the original author. Furthermore, if anyone were to come out of the woodwork and debunk anthropogenic global warming, it would dry up that seemingly infinite sea of funding they were receiving. In fact, the "Piltdown Man" hoax, where the skull of a "missing link" was created by combining the jawbone of an orangutan with a human skull by fame-craving scientists, went on for over 40 years because of lack of true, proper scientific scrutiny. They were so anxious to prove evolution that they were blinded in their observations. Dr. Weinstein reveals in this article how many scientists today may also be blinded in the peer review process by the temptations of funding, prestige, and possibly even the sheer peer pressure that occurs within the scientific community.





Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue
Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 29, 2009




Monographs, books, technical papers, white papers, and other forms of published material that are to be widely disseminated should ideally be examined by independent reviewers (generally called peer reviewers) with reasonable knowledge of the subject area. The reviewer may or may not be as expert in the details of the subject as the author, but should be at least generally expert in a broader overlapping field. Frequently papers have material that covers more than one subject area and people within a narrow field may do poorly reviewing the broader subject. It is frequently best to have some reviewers that are knowledgeable people but not as close to the narrow field as the author, for a more independent and broader coverage.

The reviews, possibly resulting in suggested changes, do not assure the final material is correct. The lack of a review also does not mean the results are not correct and clear. It just increases the chance for errors to slip through.

If the paper is very complex or has numerous references, it may not be possible to do as good a review as desired in a reasonable time unless the reviewer is intimately familiar with the work. These reviews are often done within a small group of experts, who may even have collaborated on each others papers. The members of the overly narrow review group may have evolved toward a common understanding on the subject, and if the understanding is not correct, almost all of the limited number of experts in that field may make common mistakes that outside reviewers may not make. However, a reviewer outside that group may not be expert enough to be fully on top of the material. This is a problem without a clear solution, especially in fields with a limited number of experts. There are also occasions when errors in assumptions used in developing equations, or in interpretation of instrumentation result in erroneous conclusions that are repeated in many papers until the error is caught and corrected. For this reason all papers must be considered suspect until history vindicates or falsifies them. A paradigm shift on a subject may result from these types of errors being corrected at later times.

An example of the problems that may arise with peer-reviewed papers occurred on a project that I worked on for several years. The branch I was working with was examining possible methods to reduce turbulent skin friction over surfaces, with the goal of reducing aircraft and ship drag, and thus save fuel. We had developed several successful concepts that gave small but useful reductions in drag. These included “longitudinal microgrooves”, “large eddy breakup devices”, and for water flow, “air bubbles in longitudinal grooves”. An additional concept we worked on was a “compliant wall”. This last method appeared to be particularly promising as a method to damp out near wall turbulence by absorbing wall pressure fluctuations. Unlike the other methods, this last technique required a soft and movable wall, so it was more difficult to measure the drag of a test object. Several other groups all over the world also started work on this concept (bandwagon effect), and our group (and many of the other groups) obtained what we thought were favorable results in several tests. Dozens of peer-reviewed papers were published in main line journals (e.g., Journal of Fluid Physics, AIAA journal, etc.). The main experimental technique used to measure the drag for this type of model was a hot-wire Reynolds stress probe. Test results seemed to indicate a large reduction in drag. In order to independently verify the favorable result obtained with this technique, I designed and had built a large sensitive drag balance to directly measure the drag on a panel model. The direct measurement did not show the reduction in drag indicated by the hot wire probe. After much analysis, I found the cause of the problem. Reynolds stress drag measurements are proxy drag measurements. They are related to the drag under some special assumptions. In this case the critical assumption was that all of the vertical motion energy in the boundary layer was due to turbulent flow, and stayed in the boundary layer. It turned out that with a compliant wall, the flexible wall motion induced a vertical motion pressure wave that propagated as sound out of the boundary layer, so the required assumption was not valid.

Many of the other favorable tests had used the same type of probe with the same false positive result. Those that did not use the hot wire often gave results that were confusing, but many still passed peer review. It appears that since some of the other papers seemed to be getting the correct answers, they assumed they had it also and selectively chose the more favorable parts of their results for publication. The idea was they knew what the answer had to be so they just had to be selective in choosing data so they would be with the successful group.

When my paper was published showing the cause of the errors in the results, almost all of the compliant wall drag reduction efforts ended.

It appears to me that the AGW supporters are on a similar bandwagon. Initially the observation that the temperature had significantly increased (1 degree F) over the last 150 years, and the atmospheric CO2 content had increased significantly (over 30%) in the same period suggested a relationship. Previous analysis had indicated that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and could cause some temperature increase. The effort to show that the temperature rise rate and level was unusual was pushed by several scientists, and initially it looked as if this might be true. After many other scientists jumped on the bandwagon, because they assumed the hypothesis was valid, they then had a personal stake (funding, prestige) to support the claims. Later data and analysis seemed to show the temperature increase was a local period of global warming (GW), but did not have a dominant component of AGW. This threatened the whole structure of the AGW position, and as is typical when a paradigm shift threatens to occur, was met with considerable resistance. This was further exasperated by the political and social involvement that had started a major drive to cut man made greenhouse gas production, and at a very high cost to society.

Recent efforts by even well respected authors to publish papers that falsify claims of AGW have had great difficulty passing peer review, apparently because they went against the current paradigm, not because they were shown to be in error. The misuse of claims of support for AGW by “peer reviewed publications”, and rejection of analysis because it is not peer reviewed is often used to try to discredit the opposition. This is not how science is done. The facts should speak for themselves.

New technology is changing some of the older paradigms of communication, and use of electronic media now allows very rapid and sometimes real time interaction discussing material and presenting results. Paul Coppin stated in a response to a recent blog “Technical blogs are rapidly replacing the “letters” sections of formal journals as the place where a public airing of a journal article or topic takes place. The very nature of blogs also provides a means for the lay populace to look inside both the science and the process of the science. In the past this has been generally closed to common scrutiny. In particular, science writers have access to information and opinion they had to previous dig out or interview for”. This crossover of discussion will surely increase. Since the purpose of science is (supposed) to advance knowledge, the real time open interaction may actually do a better job than the normal peer review process for much (but not all) material. Formal publications still should be made when possible for unique data or concepts, but discussions of the consequences are probably better done in the electronic medium. One major purpose of the formal publication is getting the author credit for the material. There is not presently an equivalent way to archive and give credit for a publication on the web. There needs to be such a structure made available. The draft of a publication may be put on a web site and left open for review and comments. This might actually be a more effective peer review process for some types of papers since a wider audience has access to look for flaws. This may be done in conjunction with some formal peer reviewing. The corrected final paper then may be archived, but with continuous access to later catch overlooked problems.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD




Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up





Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2131 | Replies: 958 | Views: 6877717
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English