Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***
Science and Public Policy Institute

***
Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Op Ed on Deflategate

» Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?

» Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error

» Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline

» Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?

» Goodell and Deflategate Science

» Raymond Bradley and the Grand Old Duke of York

» Ruling out high deflation scenarios

» Exponent’s Transients: Bodge or Botch?

» NFL Officials Over-Inflated Patriot Balls

***
Watts Up With That?

***
Global Warming News

» Obama’s Alaska Trip: Do We Have a Climate Change Problem or a Russia Problem?

» Clean Energy Incentive Program: New Unlawful Element in EPA’s Power Plant Rule?

» Rivers of Gold and Energy Poverty

» Keystone XL Review Five Times Longer than Average — AP

» Guest Post: Primer on Administrator McCarthy’s Talk Tomorrow on “The Promise of the Clean Power Plan”

» Gasoline or Ethanol: Which Is More Polluting?

» EPA’s Colossally Costly Power Plan Fulfills Obama’s Campaign Promise

» EPA’s Power Sector Carbon Rules: Are They Legal?

» Clean Power Plan: Reactions to EPA’s Preview “Fact Sheet”

» Hearing Shines Light on Social Cost of Carbon Sophistry

***
Fox News - Climate Change Stories

***
Michelle Malkin - Enviro-Nitwits

***
DailyTech Michael Asher`s blog

***
C3 - Climate Cycles Change

***
CATO - Global Warming

***
CanadaFreePress - Global Warming

***
More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Renaming Mount McKinley Obama’s Insult To Competence
»Flashback 2009: ABC News Envisioned Apocalyptic 2015 Triggered By Climate Change
»Obama: Climate Deniers Who Ignore Science Are on ‘Their Own Shrinking Island’
»‘What’s Really Melting: Obama’s Alaskan Lies’
Surface temperature data from the National Climatic Data Center shows that the average temperature i ...
»Obama Warns of Planet Beyond Repair: ‘Submerged Countries. Abandoned Cities. Fields No Longer Growing’
»NBC Treks to Arctic Alaska to Find ‘America’s First Climate Change Refugees’ ‘Living in Fear’
»Obama’s apocalyptic Alaskan scenario more fiction than fact
Alaskan glaciers had lost half their mass before 1950, long before the Industrial revolution took of ...
»Three Facts To Counter Obama’s Alaska Global Warming Hype
Fact #1: Global temperatures have been flat for nearly 19 years. Fact #2: Polar ice is not dangerous ...
»Climatologist: Obama peddling a non-issue in Alaska
Dr. Pat Michaels, director of the Center for The Study of Science at the Cato Institute, tells OneNe ...
»If The Arctic Is Melting Why Is The President Ordering New Ice Breakers For Arctic?
'Obama will propose speeding the acquisition and building of new Coast Guard icebreakers that can op ...


Date published: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:03:00 +0000
Details

»Hurricane Fred a New Record: Farthest East
Newly formed Hurricane Fred over the Cape Verde Islands is, as far as I can tell, the farthest east ...
»Summer Snow to Greet Obama on Alaska Climate Trip
When President Obama visits Alaska this week to campaign for a new international agreement to fight ...
»Too Much Cotton Leads to Meltdown
I try to be patient with folks. Give them the benefit of the doubt. I have allowed just about any ki ...
»New Evidence Regarding Tropical Water Vapor Feedback, Lindzen’s Iris Effect, and the Missing Hotspot
As part of a DOE grant we are testing climate models against satellite observations, particularly re ...
»Perseid Meteor Shower was Slow, but Colorful
Last night I took several hundred photos between 11:30 pm and 4 am trying to catch some Perseid mete ...
»Spencer on Varney & Co Talking Obama’s Clean Power Plan
Stuart Varney interviewed me live this morning during Varney & Co on Fox Business…I did n ...
»Ice Amazingly Persists in Hudson and James Bay
While the world frets over global warming, sea ice amazingly persists as far south as James Bay in C ...
»Spencer on Stossel’s “Science Wars”
My most recent appearance on Stossel is now available on YouTube where I had the opportunity to shar ...
»Color Satellite Shows CA Wildfire Smoke Spreading Over Pacific
The wildfires north of San Francisco are far from contained today, with over 90 sq. miles torched, 9 ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for July 2015: +0.18 C
NOTE: This is the fourth monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the old ...


Date published: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:43:44 +0000
Details

»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at Forbes.com called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...


Date published: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:04 +0000
Details

»Obama to rename tallest U.S. peak in historic Alaska visit
By Jim Acosta, CNN Anchorage, Alaska (CNN)To hear the White House describe Alaska, the state has bec ...
»Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’
By Christopher Booker, telegraph.co.uk The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk ...
»How Obama’s New CO2 Rules Will Impact Global CO2 Levels & Temperature
By Elmer Beauregard On Monday Obama came out with his new CO2 regulations increasing the amount of c ...
»Obama Commits US To Even Deeper CO2 Cuts To Appease UN
by Michael Bastasch, DailyCaller The Obama administration is unveiling a new regulatory agenda Monda ...
»Obama To Unveil Tough Emission Cuts As Part Of Climate Change Actions
The cuts will be Obama’s toughest action yet to combat climate change. NEW YORK (AP) — Preside ...


Date published: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:35:09 +0000
Details

»Op Ed on Deflategate
In Financial Post here. My submitted version was a little harsher. #deflategate For related blog pos ...
»Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?
In today’s post,  I’m going to show the Deflategate data from a new perspective.   Rathe ...
»Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error
On June 29, I sent a letter to Ted Wells, notifying him of the erroneous description of key figures ...
»Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline
In an earlier article,  I pointed out that essential figures in the Exponent report contained (what ...
»Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?
The transcript of the Brady appeal before Goodell has been released and it’s astonishing to se ...
»Goodell and Deflategate Science
Yesterday, Roger Goodell released his decision on the Brady appeal. Most of the early discussion has ...
»Raymond Bradley and the Grand Old Duke of York
In today’s post, I’ll return to more typical Climate Audit programming.  Upside-down Man ...
»Ruling out high deflation scenarios
Further to my series of posts on Deflategate, reader chrimony observed that my statistical analysis ...
»Exponent’s Transients: Bodge or Botch?
In my first writeup, I observed that Exponent’s Logo transients appeared to be bodged too high ...
»NFL Officials Over-Inflated Patriot Balls
One of the ironies of the NFL’s conduct in this affair is that it can be established that NFL ...


Date published: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 03:10:27 +0000
Details



Date published: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 01:33:05 +0000
Details

»Andrew Bolt reports on NOAA’s exaggerated claim that July 2015 was the hottest month on Earth since records began
Great to see a blog such as Andrew Bolt tackling climate misinformation. – Sydney Liberal MP C ...
»Rare signs of life and constructive thought in Abbott Govt
Fairfax and ABC trying to topple Abbott Government, Peter Dutton says
»Australian Bureau of Meteorology predicted a warm winter in 2015- monster fail in South East Australia
Tasmania’s winter coldest in nearly 50 years, Bureau of Meteorology says – that is since ...
»Video memories – in mid 2009 Prime Minster Rudd announces $400million for carbon capture and storage
Thanks to Michael Smith – Hear Kev747 talking 150 days before ClimateGate and Copenhagen ...
»Swedish research says Russia has been gaming the carbon credits system
Why would we be surprised that Russia duds the sucker West? Vlad would expect his minions to do exac ...
»NT Govt planning a gas pipeline to Eastern States by 2019
Northern Territory fracked gas to flow to eastern states by 2019, Chief Minister says – A year ...
»Abbott Govt faces multiple challenges and the boss is away in the Torres Strait
Under constantly evolving attacks – from a clever mostly taxpayer funded GreenLeft coalition ...
»Global warming causing more frost damage to Australian cereal crops
Climate change blamed for Australia’s increased frost risk for cereal crops John Brignell has ...
»Detailed Green plans to stop Australian coal exports
A must read 17 page pdf download only 3.6MB – Stopping the Australian Coal Export Boom ...
»Great opportunity to save some money – Australia should take UN advice and not attend Paris climate talks
Gotta love this – UN climate expert warns Australia’s emissions target should not be fin ...


Date published: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:23:25 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
Well I have heard this lot and so have I heard tha[more ...]
08/31 05:05

Posted by Anonymous
Thanks for the cool blog and great forum :) houseo[more ...]
08/09 21:23

Posted by Anonymous
Is a great topic salwar suits in collection salwar[more ...]
07/09 00:23

Posted by Anonymous
I think, it’s a thoughtful posting and offering al[more ...]
07/06 04:47

Posted by Anonymous
Very good digestive tract wellbeing = bodily healt[more ...]
06/21 05:40

Posted by Anonymous
[quote][quote]You put certainly revolutionary idea[more ...]
05/14 11:08

Posted by Anonymous
Anonymous wrote ...You put certainly revolutionary[more ...]
05/12 23:28

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:27

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:25

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:24

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Sunday 07 June 2009 - 21:51:28 // comment: 43 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

Most everyone knows the classic definition of peer review, "the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field". But do you know how the process actually works? Dr. Weinstein does; he has been on both ends of the process. No Longer Supported
Often times, the ones performing the peer review are friends or close colleagues of the original author. Furthermore, if anyone were to come out of the woodwork and debunk anthropogenic global warming, it would dry up that seemingly infinite sea of funding they were receiving. In fact, the "Piltdown Man" hoax, where the skull of a "missing link" was created by combining the jawbone of an orangutan with a human skull by fame-craving scientists, went on for over 40 years because of lack of true, proper scientific scrutiny. They were so anxious to prove evolution that they were blinded in their observations. Dr. Weinstein reveals in this article how many scientists today may also be blinded in the peer review process by the temptations of funding, prestige, and possibly even the sheer peer pressure that occurs within the scientific community.





Some Limitations of the Peer Review Process and Its Effect on the AGW Issue
Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 29, 2009




Monographs, books, technical papers, white papers, and other forms of published material that are to be widely disseminated should ideally be examined by independent reviewers (generally called peer reviewers) with reasonable knowledge of the subject area. The reviewer may or may not be as expert in the details of the subject as the author, but should be at least generally expert in a broader overlapping field. Frequently papers have material that covers more than one subject area and people within a narrow field may do poorly reviewing the broader subject. It is frequently best to have some reviewers that are knowledgeable people but not as close to the narrow field as the author, for a more independent and broader coverage.

The reviews, possibly resulting in suggested changes, do not assure the final material is correct. The lack of a review also does not mean the results are not correct and clear. It just increases the chance for errors to slip through.

If the paper is very complex or has numerous references, it may not be possible to do as good a review as desired in a reasonable time unless the reviewer is intimately familiar with the work. These reviews are often done within a small group of experts, who may even have collaborated on each others papers. The members of the overly narrow review group may have evolved toward a common understanding on the subject, and if the understanding is not correct, almost all of the limited number of experts in that field may make common mistakes that outside reviewers may not make. However, a reviewer outside that group may not be expert enough to be fully on top of the material. This is a problem without a clear solution, especially in fields with a limited number of experts. There are also occasions when errors in assumptions used in developing equations, or in interpretation of instrumentation result in erroneous conclusions that are repeated in many papers until the error is caught and corrected. For this reason all papers must be considered suspect until history vindicates or falsifies them. A paradigm shift on a subject may result from these types of errors being corrected at later times.

An example of the problems that may arise with peer-reviewed papers occurred on a project that I worked on for several years. The branch I was working with was examining possible methods to reduce turbulent skin friction over surfaces, with the goal of reducing aircraft and ship drag, and thus save fuel. We had developed several successful concepts that gave small but useful reductions in drag. These included “longitudinal microgrooves”, “large eddy breakup devices”, and for water flow, “air bubbles in longitudinal grooves”. An additional concept we worked on was a “compliant wall”. This last method appeared to be particularly promising as a method to damp out near wall turbulence by absorbing wall pressure fluctuations. Unlike the other methods, this last technique required a soft and movable wall, so it was more difficult to measure the drag of a test object. Several other groups all over the world also started work on this concept (bandwagon effect), and our group (and many of the other groups) obtained what we thought were favorable results in several tests. Dozens of peer-reviewed papers were published in main line journals (e.g., Journal of Fluid Physics, AIAA journal, etc.). The main experimental technique used to measure the drag for this type of model was a hot-wire Reynolds stress probe. Test results seemed to indicate a large reduction in drag. In order to independently verify the favorable result obtained with this technique, I designed and had built a large sensitive drag balance to directly measure the drag on a panel model. The direct measurement did not show the reduction in drag indicated by the hot wire probe. After much analysis, I found the cause of the problem. Reynolds stress drag measurements are proxy drag measurements. They are related to the drag under some special assumptions. In this case the critical assumption was that all of the vertical motion energy in the boundary layer was due to turbulent flow, and stayed in the boundary layer. It turned out that with a compliant wall, the flexible wall motion induced a vertical motion pressure wave that propagated as sound out of the boundary layer, so the required assumption was not valid.

Many of the other favorable tests had used the same type of probe with the same false positive result. Those that did not use the hot wire often gave results that were confusing, but many still passed peer review. It appears that since some of the other papers seemed to be getting the correct answers, they assumed they had it also and selectively chose the more favorable parts of their results for publication. The idea was they knew what the answer had to be so they just had to be selective in choosing data so they would be with the successful group.

When my paper was published showing the cause of the errors in the results, almost all of the compliant wall drag reduction efforts ended.

It appears to me that the AGW supporters are on a similar bandwagon. Initially the observation that the temperature had significantly increased (1 degree F) over the last 150 years, and the atmospheric CO2 content had increased significantly (over 30%) in the same period suggested a relationship. Previous analysis had indicated that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and could cause some temperature increase. The effort to show that the temperature rise rate and level was unusual was pushed by several scientists, and initially it looked as if this might be true. After many other scientists jumped on the bandwagon, because they assumed the hypothesis was valid, they then had a personal stake (funding, prestige) to support the claims. Later data and analysis seemed to show the temperature increase was a local period of global warming (GW), but did not have a dominant component of AGW. This threatened the whole structure of the AGW position, and as is typical when a paradigm shift threatens to occur, was met with considerable resistance. This was further exasperated by the political and social involvement that had started a major drive to cut man made greenhouse gas production, and at a very high cost to society.

Recent efforts by even well respected authors to publish papers that falsify claims of AGW have had great difficulty passing peer review, apparently because they went against the current paradigm, not because they were shown to be in error. The misuse of claims of support for AGW by “peer reviewed publications”, and rejection of analysis because it is not peer reviewed is often used to try to discredit the opposition. This is not how science is done. The facts should speak for themselves.

New technology is changing some of the older paradigms of communication, and use of electronic media now allows very rapid and sometimes real time interaction discussing material and presenting results. Paul Coppin stated in a response to a recent blog “Technical blogs are rapidly replacing the “letters” sections of formal journals as the place where a public airing of a journal article or topic takes place. The very nature of blogs also provides a means for the lay populace to look inside both the science and the process of the science. In the past this has been generally closed to common scrutiny. In particular, science writers have access to information and opinion they had to previous dig out or interview for”. This crossover of discussion will surely increase. Since the purpose of science is (supposed) to advance knowledge, the real time open interaction may actually do a better job than the normal peer review process for much (but not all) material. Formal publications still should be made when possible for unique data or concepts, but discussions of the consequences are probably better done in the electronic medium. One major purpose of the formal publication is getting the author credit for the material. There is not presently an equivalent way to archive and give credit for a publication on the web. There needs to be such a structure made available. The draft of a publication may be put on a web site and left open for review and comments. This might actually be a more effective peer review process for some types of papers since a wider audience has access to look for flaws. This may be done in conjunction with some formal peer reviewing. The corrected final paper then may be archived, but with continuous access to later catch overlooked problems.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD




Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up





Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2106 | Replies: 838 | Views: 6195432
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English