Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***

***

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» New Antarctic Temperature Reconstruction

» Reconciling Model-Observation Reconciliations

» Part 2- The TV5 Monde Hack and APT28

» From Nigerian Scams to DNC Hack Attribution – Part 1

» Guccifer 2: From January to May, 2016

» Guccifer 2 and “Russian” Metadata

» Guccifer 2 Email Time Zone

» Time Zone of Guccifer 2 cf.7z

» Email Dates in the Wikileaks DNC Archive

» Arctic Lake Sediments: Reply to JEG

***

***

Global Warming News

» Leaked Clean Power Plan Repeal Proposal

» Documents Pertinent to the Nomination of Jeffrey Bossert Clark for AAG DOJ ENRD

» SJW-day at COP22

» Clean Power Plan: EPA’s Updated Base Case Now Tallies with EIA Data

» Clean Power Plan Oral Argument Transcript Available Here!

» President Obama and Chinese President Xi will officially join the Paris Climate Treaty on 3rd September

» South China Morning Post reports: China and US to ratify landmark Paris climate deal ahead of G20 summit, sources reveal

» Posting: Little-Known Documents Pertinent to Assessing the Legality of EPA’s Clean Energy Incentive Program

» Kyoto-Financed Cook Stoves Fail as Health/Climate “Intervention”

» CEQ Finalizes NEPA Guidance for Greenhouse Gases: Will Pointless Keystone XL Controversy Become ‘New Normal’?

***

***


***


***


***


***


***

More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Climate change will make Bearded Dragons dumber
»10.02 °C of Warming & Human Extinction by 2026!!! Film at 11.
»Claim: ‘Gender justice:’ ‘To combat climate change, increase women′s participation’
»Claim: ‘Climate Change Could Increase Volcano Eruptions’
»WaPo: What the first Thanksgiving can teach us about adjusting to ‘climate shock’
»BBC hypes study: Using Deep fat fryers ‘may help form clouds that limit global warming’
»Oh No! How climate change could cause a pumpkin shortage! – ‘Could quash a Thanksgiving tradition’
»Trump To Sign Defense Bill Calling Climate Change A National Security Threat
»Climate Change Alarmism Is ‘Garbage In, Garbage Out,’ Retired NASA Physicist Says
»Climate Statistician: Don’t confuse science with modeling – It’s Kathleen Hartnett White, not Ed Markey, Who’s Right on Climate Models


Date published: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 03:16:34 +0000
Details

»Trump Wrongly Blamed for Destroying Sea Ice Satellite
No, Our Ability to Monitor Sea Ice Has Not Ended Yesterday, The Guardian ran a story with the headli ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for October 2017: +0.63 deg. C
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for October, 2017 was +0. ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for September, 2017: +0.54 deg. C
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for September, 2017 was +0.54 deg. C, up from the August, 2017 value of +0.41 deg. C (click for full size version): The global, hemispheric, and tropical LT anomalies from the 30-year (1981-2010) average for the last 21 months are: YEAR MO GLOBE NHEM. SHEM. […]
»The Monty Hall Problem: There Is No Correct Answer
A diversion from global warming topics. The simple little probability problem below has apparently b ...
»The 11-Year Major Hurricane Drought: Much More Unusual than Two Cat 4 Strikes
Weather.com published an article noting that the two Cat 4 hurricane strikes this year (Harvey and I ...
»Cracks in the Empire’s Armor Appear
Yesterday brought widespread news coverage of a new “study” published in Nature Geoscien ...
»Inevitable Disaster: Why Hurricanes Can’t Be Blamed On Global Warming
Partly in response to the crazy claims of the usual global warming experts (Stevie Wonder, Beyonc ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for August, 2017: +0.41 deg. C
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for August, 2017 was +0.4 ...
»Houston Area Flooding Seen from Space
Today the skies cleared enough to see the huge amount of water flowing out of southeast Texas and Ho ...
»Texas Major Hurricane Intensity Not Related to Gulf Water Temperatures
As the Houston flood disaster is unfolding, there is considerable debate about whether Hurricane Har ...


Date published: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:29:26 +0000
Details

»My Climate Plan, Wherein a Climate Skeptic Actually Advocates for A Carbon Tax
I am always amazed at how people like to draw conclusions about what I write merely from the title, ...
»Come See My Climate Talk on Wednesday Evening, February 24, at Claremont-McKenna College
I am speaking on Wednesday night at the Athenaeum at Claremont-McKenna College near Pomona on Wednes ...
»US Average Temperature Trends in Context
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. There was some debate a while back around about a temperature chart so ...
»Revisiting (Yet Again) Hansen’s 1998 Forecast on Global Warming to Congress
I want to briefly revisit Hansen’s 1998 Congressional forecast.  Yes, I and many others have c ...
»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...


Date published: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:20:20 +0000
Details

»M4GW Makes Inconvenient Music Video
In honor of Al Gore’s new movie Elmer and the M4GW players have come back to lambaste Al one m ...
»Top Ten Reasons Why Trump Should Dump The Paris Agreement
By Elmer Beauregard 1. The Globe Isn’t Warming. In fact the earth has cooled by almost 1 degre ...
»Hearing- Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method
Dr. Judith Curry President, Climate Forecast Applications Network; Professor Emeritus, Georgia Insti ...
»EPA chief Scott Pruitt says carbon dioxide is not a primary contributor to global warming
CNBC.com Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt said Thursday he does not believ ...
»Elmer’s PowerPoint Presentation – Confessions of a Graphic Designer
By Elmer Beauregard I decided to put part of my PowerPoint presentation online. As a Graphic designe ...


Date published: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:43:59 +0000
Details

»New Antarctic Temperature Reconstruction
Stenni et al (2017), Antarctic climate variability on regional and continental scales over the last ...
»Reconciling Model-Observation Reconciliations
Two very different representations of consistency between models and observations are popularly circ ...
»Part 2- The TV5 Monde Hack and APT28
In his attribution of the DNC hack, Dmitri Alperovitch, of Crowdstrike and the Atlantic Council, lin ...
»From Nigerian Scams to DNC Hack Attribution – Part 1
In Crowdstrike’s original announcement that “Russia” had hacked the DNC, Dmitri Al ...
»Guccifer 2: From January to May, 2016
Within the small community conducting technical analysis of the DNC hack, there has been ongoing con ...
»Guccifer 2 and “Russian” Metadata
The DHS-FBI intel assessment of the DNC hack concluded with “high confidence” that Gucci ...
»Guccifer 2 Email Time Zone
One of the major differences between Mr FOIA and Guccifer 2 is the latter’s use of email to co ...
»Time Zone of Guccifer 2 cf.7z
In a recent post, I observed that the majority of the emails in the Wikileaks DNC archive were sent ...
»Email Dates in the Wikileaks DNC Archive
Yesterday, Scott Ritter published a savage and thorough critique of the role of Dmitri Alperovitch a ...
»Arctic Lake Sediments: Reply to JEG
Julien Emile-Geay (JEG) submitted a lengthy comment concluding with the tasteless observation that ...


Date published: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 04:49:49 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»BoM does not correct colossal rainfall errors
In September I blogged More sloppy BoM errors as the rain-guage Alanadale in Gippsland went troppo. ...
»Australian electricity bills portrait of another National disaster
Chart by St Vincent de Paul from ALVISS Consulting – The ABC reports – St Vincent De Pau ...
»Great cartoon trajectory NZ Govt at Whaleoil
SonovaMin often has great cartoons at the one and only Whaleoil. Just nails it. We need something to ...
»Comparisons of various thermometer enclosures with Stevenson screens
I have just had a heads up from Silligy re this 2005 paper – MEASUREMENT OF AIR TEMPERATURE IN ...
»Australian parliamentary citizenship crisis
I am curious what readers think is a possible way forward – and what they think will actually ...
»Hey Ross Garnaut SA power prices fell because gas prices fell
I checked gas and electricity wholesale prices data for 2017 and the claim in the AFR Monday ...
»Perth Water Corporation rainfall pages maths disaster
While checking end of October rainfall numbers at Perth water supply dams – I looked in at 2.5 ...
»Cape Bruny AWS reads warmer than Stevenson screen 18m away
There are two temperature series for Cape Bruny on the southern tip of Tasmania. CAPE BRUNY LIGHTHOU ...
»BoM says Hobart October 2017 was the warmest ever
But the BoM fails to say that outside the Hobart urban heat island (UHI) record warmth is harder to ...
»Australian BoM October rain Outlook disaster
Could have done better – miniscule areas with above average rain predicted but it looks as if ...


Date published: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:09:17 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Edb To pst Converter
Download EDB file to PST converter software for co[more ...]
11/24 22:12

Posted by Shelly
We are stunning Dating service through this Aeroci[more ...]
11/24 12:15

Posted by Anonymous
Brilliant Microsoft OST to PST Converter is freewa[more ...]
11/24 04:33

Posted by Anonymous
NSF to PST converter is an advanced utility for sp[more ...]
11/24 04:08

Posted by Anonymous
Make OST file bugs free with the assist of Kernel [more ...]
11/24 04:05

Posted by Anonymous
I would like to share third party application to E[more ...]
11/23 23:30

Posted by Anonymous
If your OST file gets corrupted and cannot able to[more ...]
11/23 21:47

Posted by Anonymous
Best OST to PST Converter which can easily and exp[more ...]
11/23 05:48

Posted by Anonymous
Don’t be distracted with another fraud application[more ...]
11/23 03:50

Posted by Anonymous
Use Ost Recovery ool that rapidly repair damaged O[more ...]
11/23 02:20

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Debunking the CO2 Feedback Myth - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Thursday 14 May 2009 - 16:27:59 // comment: 1 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on assumptions regarding future CO2 levels and that water vapor would provide a large positive feedback effect. Dr. Weinstein (former NASA Senior Research Scientist) shows how both of these assumptions are either wrong or greatly exaggerated. No Longer Supported

Debunking the CO2 Positive Feedback Myth

Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 11, 2009



Introduction:

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on two assumptions:

  1. The atmospheric CO2 level would go from 290ppm in about 1850 to at least 580ppm in 2100.
  2. The increase in CO2 would have both a direct greenhouse gas effect, and trigger a positive feedback effect. The result would be a small direct increase in temperature from the CO2 , but the increased temperature would also result in an increase in water evaporation. The water vapor is the major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and its increase would further increase temperature, resulting in a positive feedback until the process self-limited at a significantly higher level.

The predicted direct CO2 effect is estimated to be about 1C for the doubling of CO2 level. The present level of about 388ppm would have already caused about half of the direct rise, since the effect is nonlinear. The global temperature has apparently increased by about 0.7ºC in the last 150 years, which is slightly more than the estimated direct CO2 effect, but far short of the expected feedback imposed value. In addition, the temperature level up to about 1850 was significantly lower than typical levels during the last several thousand years. Much of the period between about 1200 to 1850 has in fact been called the “Little Ice Age”. The abnormal low temperature starting point for the change makes the distinction between natural temperature rise due to a recovery from the abnormally low temperature to the present difficult to separate from CO2 and positive feedback induced increases. The CO2 increase was small until about 1940, so the positive contribution from the CO2 is based on an even smaller maximum temperature increase (about 0.3ºC) and a shorter time. All of these facts indicate that calculations of any CO2 effects and positive feedback additions would have badly missed the actual present temperature if we did not already know it.

The proposed solution to the discrepancy by the IPCC is that sulfate gas and particulate pollution from burning fossil fuels, have caused atmospheric “Global Dimming”, which greatly inhibited the correct level of warming. While this cannot be totally refuted, it is not specifically supportable either. Since the need for a strong positive feedback is needed to support the projections for the temperature rise to 2100, the mechanism for such a rise is examined.


Proposed mechanism for glacial to interglacial temperature increases:

It is very likely that over the last several hundred thousand years, axial tilt and precession in the Earth’s orbital motion (Milankovitch cycles). have triggered the transitions from glacial conditions (lasting about 100,000 years) to the significantly warmer inter-glacial periods (lasting 10,000 to 20,000 years) During the glacial cycles massive spreads of glaciers and ocean ice formed over large regions at higher latitudes, and the average Earth temperature was significantly lower than for the inter-glacial periods. The increase of average Solar insolation that occurred due to these orbital variations is not nearly sufficient to directly explain the rapid increase in global temperature, and the rapid melting of much of that ice. The variation has to have been triggered more by the change in distribution of the Solar insolation on the surface. However, once the transition was triggered, it has been hypothesized that some forms of positive feedback amplified the increase in temperature.

The most likely form of the initial trigger was due to local increases in ocean temperature in higher latitudes causing some of the marginal ocean ice to melt, and the increased absorption from the increased ocean area resulting in additional ocean absorption of Solar energy. This positive feedback was probably limited due to the small level of direct increased warming. However, the increased area of ocean and slight increased temperature also caused the water vapor pressure to slightly increase. Since water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas, this led to further temperature increases, resulting in a strong positive feedback. The increasing ocean temperature eventually resulted in large amounts of CO2 to be released, since the solubility of the water to CO2 is lower at higher temperature, and the oceans hold the vast majority of ocean+air CO2 . It appears that the large increase in CO2 lagged the overall increasing surface temperature by about 800 years or so. It is then proposed by some that the increased greenhouse effect, due to the increasing CO2 level, supercharged the positive feedback by resulting in more heating. This additional heating then released more water vapor, and the positive feedback then took off until some mechanism stopped the process (possibly cloud formation).


Present conditions and additional heating:

The present total greenhouse effect from water vapor, CO2, Methane, and other greenhouse gases is estimated to make the surface 33ºC warmer than a surface without greenhouse gases. The direct contribution from the CO2 is estimated to be about 2ºC. All greenhouse gases other than water vapor are estimated to be about 3ºC. Why would a small amount of CO2 , or all other gases than water vapor cause more of a positive feedback for heating that that due to the water vapor itself? If there is positive feedback from just the initial forcing, it would not require CO2 to do something strange, the water vapor would do it (i.e., heating causes more water vapor, which causes more heating, etc.).

Also, since water vapor is the main greenhouse gas, positive feedback would make an unstable system unless there was some mechanism that halted runaway conditions. It is likely that increased cloud formation, or even a haze condition caused by the water vapor, would decrease the effective Solar insolation so that a stable temperature is reached. Any increase in any greenhouse gas with changes small compared to the existing total would be self-limited by the water vapor limiting properties. The fact of a self-limiting process for this type of feedback can be seen by the following example. During a hot summer, the total water vapor content is much higher than for a cold winter. If there were no self-limiting mechanism, this would result in a runaway condition, which is not observed.

There is one way the small direct temperature increase from the CO2 could trigger a positive feedback (of limited scope). That would be if the small direct increase were world wide, and significantly decreased total global ice cover on the oceans. The total yearly average of the extent of ocean ice has only been measured for a few decades, and even though it has recently decreased somewhat, the present net effect is that less than 0.3 percent of the Earth’s surface has been exposed to a lower albedo (and thus higher absorption of energy), and this is at locations of very low Solar insolation. Most of even this ice area change is probably due to the natural variation, but the net change of absorbed energy is not sufficient to make a significant difference even if most of it was due to the CO2 increase. In addition, the melted area is now decreasing as we go into a multi-year cooling period. Historical records indicate this slight variation is not unusual over several decadal cycles.


Conclusion:

Since water vapor is by far the largest greenhouse gas on the Earth, and since the Earth is mostly water covered, it is easy to see why the response of water to perturbations in the level and distribution of Solar insolation would be most important in the shift from glacial ages to interglacial periods. Reasonable arguments can be made for a strong positive feedback of water vapor to explain the rapid temperature increase during the transition. It is clear that such feedbacks are self-limiting, since the increase stops. However, the possible claim that the much smaller CO2 contribution, which even lags the sharp initial rise by many years, can then cause an even stronger positive feedback defies logic.

A recent significant increase of CO2, possibly with a large anthropogenic input, still results in a total less than 7% of the atmospheric greenhouse gas effect. Only about 1/3 of that is in the increase over the claimed "natural" levels. It is posited that this can somehow override the water vapor self-limiting mechanism by triggering a small increase in temperature to thus release more water vapor and supercharge a temperature rise to several times the direct effect of the CO2 itself. Since the self-limiting mechanism for the water vapor is present, this does not follow logically. Actual temperature changes have many drivers, but CO2 does not appear to be a significant driver at the levels or variations in levels present, and certainly can't have the amplifying effect claimed.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD




Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up





Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2327 | Replies: 1421 | Views: 7952255
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English