Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***

***

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Joelle Gergis, Data Torturer

» Gergis

» Are energy budget TCR estimates biased low, as Richardson et al (2016) claim?

» Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error

» Schmidt’s Histogram Diagram Doesn’t Refute Christy

» Gavin Schmidt and Reference Period “Trickery”

» Objective Bayesian parameter estimation: Incorporating prior information

» Marvel et al.: GISS did omit land use forcing

» Bayesian parameter estimation: Radiocarbon dating re-examined

» Gerry Browning: In Memory of Professor Heinz Kreiss

***

***

Global Warming News

» Democratic Platform Vows To Meet Climate Challenge with Good-Paying Jobs, Cheaper Energy from Green Sources, and National Mobilization

» Cognitive Dissonance Among Elected Climate Alarmists

» Republican Party Platform: Paris Climate Treaty Requires Ratification; Defund UNFCCC; and Block EPA Climate Rules

» Philippine President Rejects Paris Climate Treaty

» Fifteen State AGs Ask Congress To Do Its Job

» House Hearing on Ivanpah Solar Plant Exposes Preferential Treatment

» EPA Administrator Testifies before House Science Committee

» EPA’s PM2.5 Co-Benefits PR Trick Exposed

» More Good News on Climate

» House Panel Asks McCarthy: How Is EPA’s Continuing Implementation of the Clean Power Plan Legal under the Stay?

***

***


***


***


***


***


***

More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»PLAYING GOD? Tens of millions spent on huge project to change the WEATHER – ‘Putting chemicals in the sky’
»Hollywood stars target Trump’s ‘climate change denial’ 
»Little Green Lies: Why Electric Cars Won’t Save the Environment
»Dem platform rejects fossil fuels, but DNC gladly takes oil money
»Clinton campaign says carbon tax not out of the question
»Watch: Democrats at convention more worried about ‘climate change’ then ISIS
Delegates vote 'climate change' as bigger threat than ISIS.  Woman: "The threat of climate change is ...
»Review: ‘DO THE CLIMATE HUSTLE!’ – Film Called ‘Devastatingly Effective’ – ‘Funny’ (Order DVD Now)
'One of the most interesting aspects of the film is the number of left-leaning scientists it feature ...
»‘Climate Talking Points For Trump’
»Arnold Schwarzenegger takes on climate change in James Cameron’s DNC video
»Clinton adviser: Obama climate plan may have to be redesigned


Date published: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 03:50:36 +0000
Details

»Pokemon Nerds View Chinese Spy Satellite Rocket Burning Up Over Western U.S.
Thousands of lucky onlookers got to see the upper stage of a Chinese rocket reenter the atmosphere a ...
»Solar Impulse: Poster Child for the Impracticality of Solar Power
Solar energy has some legitimate uses in isolated cases, such as providing electricity where there i ...
»Record Warm 2016? What a Difference One Month Makes
With the rapid cooling now occurring in the global average tropospheric temperature, my previous pre ...
»UAH Global Temperature Update for June 2016: +0.34 deg. C
Second largest 2-month drop in global average satellite temperatures. Largest 2-month drop in tropic ...
»More on the Global Climate Emergency: Email from a “Fan”
I get some hate email from time to time. Actually, not very much. I guess I’m still cruising u ...
»“Climate System Scientist” Claims Jet Stream Crossing the Equator is Unprecedented
Paul Beckwith has a masters degree in laser optics, which he has somehow parlayed into being a “Climate System Scientist” to spread alarmism about the climate system. But his post “Unprecedented, Jet Stream Crosses Equator” suggests he knows little of meteorology, let alone climate. A “jet stream” in the usual sense of the word is […]
»2016 Will Likely See Record Global Warmth in Satellite Data
…but the approaching La Nina might extend the global warming pause to 20 years. Even though gl ...
»If Skeptics can be Prosecuted for Fraud, So can Alarmists
I’m glad to see this news report today, and I’ve been saying the same thing ever since t ...
»No, Spencer’s Research Wasn’t Funded by Peabody
My vacation this week was interrupted this morning by some hate e-mail…apparently, the recent ...
»Another Potential Reason Why Climate Sensitivity is Over-Estimated
BACKGROUND It’s been quite a while since I’ve discussed why the diagnosis of feedbacks i ...


Date published: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:17:36 +0000
Details

»My Climate Plan, Wherein a Climate Skeptic Actually Advocates for A Carbon Tax
I am always amazed at how people like to draw conclusions about what I write merely from the title, ...
»Come See My Climate Talk on Wednesday Evening, February 24, at Claremont-McKenna College
I am speaking on Wednesday night at the Athenaeum at Claremont-McKenna College near Pomona on Wednes ...
»US Average Temperature Trends in Context
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. There was some debate a while back around about a temperature chart so ...
»Revisiting (Yet Again) Hansen’s 1998 Forecast on Global Warming to Congress
I want to briefly revisit Hansen’s 1998 Congressional forecast.  Yes, I and many others have c ...
»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...


Date published: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:20:20 +0000
Details

»Trump-ing Hillary on EPA and Global Warming
By Steve Milloy, Breitbart.com If he lives up to his campaign rhetoric, a President Donald Trump wou ...
»Jimmy Kimmel: Totally F**king Wrong on Climate Change
By James Delingpole, Breitbart.com Jimmy Kimmel is great. Probably the most relaxed, amiable, and fu ...
»Obama’s Violating the Constitution by Not Submitting Climate Treaty to Senate
The Daily Signal Today at United Nations Headquarters in New York City, Secretary of State John Kerr ...
»Climate Hustle Coming to Theaters on May 2, The Debate is Just Beginning
By Elmer Beauregard I had the privilege of going to D.C. to see the Premiere of Climate Hustle last ...
»‘Climate Hustle’ goes to DC: Skeptical film to premiere on Capitol Hill
Riveting panel with Gov. Sarah Palin and other guests (March 31, 2016) The U.S. premiere of CFACT’s ...


Date published: Thu, 05 May 2016 20:12:47 +0000
Details

»Joelle Gergis, Data Torturer
In 2012, the then much ballyhoo-ed Australian temperature reconstruction of Gergis et al 2012 myster ...
»Gergis
redirect to here
»Are energy budget TCR estimates biased low, as Richardson et al (2016) claim?
A guest post by Nic Lewis   Introduction and Summary In a recently published paper (REA16), Mar ...
»Deflategate: Controversy is due to Scientist Error
I’ve submitted an article entitled “New Light on Deflategate: Critical Technical Errors ...
»Schmidt’s Histogram Diagram Doesn’t Refute Christy
In my most recent post,  I discussed yet another incident in the long running dispute about the inco ...
»Gavin Schmidt and Reference Period “Trickery”
In the past few weeks, I’ve been re-examining the long-standing dispute over the discrepancy b ...
»Objective Bayesian parameter estimation: Incorporating prior information
A guest article by Nic Lewis Introduction In a recent article I discussed Bayesian parameter inferen ...
»Marvel et al.: GISS did omit land use forcing
A guest article by Nic Lewis I reported in a previous post, here, a number of serious problems that ...
»Bayesian parameter estimation: Radiocarbon dating re-examined
A guest article by Nic Lewis Introduction In April 2014 I published a guest article about statistica ...
»Gerry Browning: In Memory of Professor Heinz Kreiss
Gerry Browning writes: The Correct System of Equations for Climate and Weather Models The system of ...


Date published: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:25:44 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Clean Energy Council delusional about wind power
Dug out of my files this 9 page April 2012 pdf from the CEC titled “There’s power in wind: nat ...
»Moratorium required on further Australian wind power
The AEMO price blowouts that flowed from the 9 May 2016 shutdown of South Australian coal fired powe ...
»Coast to gorgeous coast – Australia has only 200MW wind power at 8am
This NemWatch screenshot shows how wind is completely useless at times. Unless we shut the Nation do ...
»ABC headline “Hanson’s views on Islam dominate Q & A” is utter rubbish
A true headline could be “ABC inspired and GreenLeft attacks on Hanson dominate Q & A. ...
»Record cold July days in tropical NT and NW to central Qld
This animation for the 12th to 15th July shows a cool anomaly which moves from northern WA into the ...
»The Australian Energy Market Commission makes it up as it goes along
Read and weep – Review of market frameworks for power system security 14 July 2016 – No ...
»Will Malcolm Turnbull be Australia’s lamest “Lame Duck” Prime Minister?
So innovative and excited Malcolm gets to be PM with a micro-majority. Every day praying there will ...
»South Australia burning diesel to prop up electricity exports to Victoria
At 10.35am AEST Nemwatch shows SA burning diesel to generate 91MW to contribute to a Region Total De ...
»Fracking opponents on even weaker ground now
RetractionWatch.com reports – The authors of two environmental papers, including one about the ...
»Australian Electoral Commission travels backwards in time
Yesterday morning I noticed some odd reverse movements in the percentage of votes counted in the six ...


Date published: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 01:48:35 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
It is said that when playing CSGO games.Having the[more ...]
07/21 00:18

Posted by Anonymous
< Global Offensive > is a sequel to the distinc[more ...]
07/21 00:17

Posted by HaHa
< Global Offensive > is a sequel to the distinc[more ...]
07/21 00:15

Posted by Anonymous
This article can tell you recover deleted photos f[more ...]
07/17 18:49

Posted by Anonymous
You can try this android data recovery to recover [more ...]
07/17 18:46

Posted by Anonymous
This article may be helpful to you: recover delete[more ...]
07/17 18:43

Posted by Anonymous
Sometimes it happens that we mistakenly delete som[more ...]
07/13 20:34

Posted by aaronbaker
Anonymous wrote ...I have a similar experience. Tw[more ...]
07/04 19:26

Posted by Anonymous
I have a similar experience. Two months ago I dele[more ...]
07/04 02:45

Posted by Anonymous
That was truly amazing post thanks for share this [more ...]
07/02 06:13

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Debunking the CO2 Feedback Myth - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Thursday 14 May 2009 - 16:27:59 // comment: 1 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on assumptions regarding future CO2 levels and that water vapor would provide a large positive feedback effect. Dr. Weinstein (former NASA Senior Research Scientist) shows how both of these assumptions are either wrong or greatly exaggerated. No Longer Supported

Debunking the CO2 Positive Feedback Myth

Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 11, 2009



Introduction:

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on two assumptions:

  1. The atmospheric CO2 level would go from 290ppm in about 1850 to at least 580ppm in 2100.
  2. The increase in CO2 would have both a direct greenhouse gas effect, and trigger a positive feedback effect. The result would be a small direct increase in temperature from the CO2 , but the increased temperature would also result in an increase in water evaporation. The water vapor is the major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and its increase would further increase temperature, resulting in a positive feedback until the process self-limited at a significantly higher level.

The predicted direct CO2 effect is estimated to be about 1C for the doubling of CO2 level. The present level of about 388ppm would have already caused about half of the direct rise, since the effect is nonlinear. The global temperature has apparently increased by about 0.7ºC in the last 150 years, which is slightly more than the estimated direct CO2 effect, but far short of the expected feedback imposed value. In addition, the temperature level up to about 1850 was significantly lower than typical levels during the last several thousand years. Much of the period between about 1200 to 1850 has in fact been called the “Little Ice Age”. The abnormal low temperature starting point for the change makes the distinction between natural temperature rise due to a recovery from the abnormally low temperature to the present difficult to separate from CO2 and positive feedback induced increases. The CO2 increase was small until about 1940, so the positive contribution from the CO2 is based on an even smaller maximum temperature increase (about 0.3ºC) and a shorter time. All of these facts indicate that calculations of any CO2 effects and positive feedback additions would have badly missed the actual present temperature if we did not already know it.

The proposed solution to the discrepancy by the IPCC is that sulfate gas and particulate pollution from burning fossil fuels, have caused atmospheric “Global Dimming”, which greatly inhibited the correct level of warming. While this cannot be totally refuted, it is not specifically supportable either. Since the need for a strong positive feedback is needed to support the projections for the temperature rise to 2100, the mechanism for such a rise is examined.


Proposed mechanism for glacial to interglacial temperature increases:

It is very likely that over the last several hundred thousand years, axial tilt and precession in the Earth’s orbital motion (Milankovitch cycles). have triggered the transitions from glacial conditions (lasting about 100,000 years) to the significantly warmer inter-glacial periods (lasting 10,000 to 20,000 years) During the glacial cycles massive spreads of glaciers and ocean ice formed over large regions at higher latitudes, and the average Earth temperature was significantly lower than for the inter-glacial periods. The increase of average Solar insolation that occurred due to these orbital variations is not nearly sufficient to directly explain the rapid increase in global temperature, and the rapid melting of much of that ice. The variation has to have been triggered more by the change in distribution of the Solar insolation on the surface. However, once the transition was triggered, it has been hypothesized that some forms of positive feedback amplified the increase in temperature.

The most likely form of the initial trigger was due to local increases in ocean temperature in higher latitudes causing some of the marginal ocean ice to melt, and the increased absorption from the increased ocean area resulting in additional ocean absorption of Solar energy. This positive feedback was probably limited due to the small level of direct increased warming. However, the increased area of ocean and slight increased temperature also caused the water vapor pressure to slightly increase. Since water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas, this led to further temperature increases, resulting in a strong positive feedback. The increasing ocean temperature eventually resulted in large amounts of CO2 to be released, since the solubility of the water to CO2 is lower at higher temperature, and the oceans hold the vast majority of ocean+air CO2 . It appears that the large increase in CO2 lagged the overall increasing surface temperature by about 800 years or so. It is then proposed by some that the increased greenhouse effect, due to the increasing CO2 level, supercharged the positive feedback by resulting in more heating. This additional heating then released more water vapor, and the positive feedback then took off until some mechanism stopped the process (possibly cloud formation).


Present conditions and additional heating:

The present total greenhouse effect from water vapor, CO2, Methane, and other greenhouse gases is estimated to make the surface 33ºC warmer than a surface without greenhouse gases. The direct contribution from the CO2 is estimated to be about 2ºC. All greenhouse gases other than water vapor are estimated to be about 3ºC. Why would a small amount of CO2 , or all other gases than water vapor cause more of a positive feedback for heating that that due to the water vapor itself? If there is positive feedback from just the initial forcing, it would not require CO2 to do something strange, the water vapor would do it (i.e., heating causes more water vapor, which causes more heating, etc.).

Also, since water vapor is the main greenhouse gas, positive feedback would make an unstable system unless there was some mechanism that halted runaway conditions. It is likely that increased cloud formation, or even a haze condition caused by the water vapor, would decrease the effective Solar insolation so that a stable temperature is reached. Any increase in any greenhouse gas with changes small compared to the existing total would be self-limited by the water vapor limiting properties. The fact of a self-limiting process for this type of feedback can be seen by the following example. During a hot summer, the total water vapor content is much higher than for a cold winter. If there were no self-limiting mechanism, this would result in a runaway condition, which is not observed.

There is one way the small direct temperature increase from the CO2 could trigger a positive feedback (of limited scope). That would be if the small direct increase were world wide, and significantly decreased total global ice cover on the oceans. The total yearly average of the extent of ocean ice has only been measured for a few decades, and even though it has recently decreased somewhat, the present net effect is that less than 0.3 percent of the Earth’s surface has been exposed to a lower albedo (and thus higher absorption of energy), and this is at locations of very low Solar insolation. Most of even this ice area change is probably due to the natural variation, but the net change of absorbed energy is not sufficient to make a significant difference even if most of it was due to the CO2 increase. In addition, the melted area is now decreasing as we go into a multi-year cooling period. Historical records indicate this slight variation is not unusual over several decadal cycles.


Conclusion:

Since water vapor is by far the largest greenhouse gas on the Earth, and since the Earth is mostly water covered, it is easy to see why the response of water to perturbations in the level and distribution of Solar insolation would be most important in the shift from glacial ages to interglacial periods. Reasonable arguments can be made for a strong positive feedback of water vapor to explain the rapid temperature increase during the transition. It is clear that such feedbacks are self-limiting, since the increase stops. However, the possible claim that the much smaller CO2 contribution, which even lags the sharp initial rise by many years, can then cause an even stronger positive feedback defies logic.

A recent significant increase of CO2, possibly with a large anthropogenic input, still results in a total less than 7% of the atmospheric greenhouse gas effect. Only about 1/3 of that is in the increase over the claimed "natural" levels. It is posited that this can somehow override the water vapor self-limiting mechanism by triggering a small increase in temperature to thus release more water vapor and supercharge a temperature rise to several times the direct effect of the CO2 itself. Since the self-limiting mechanism for the water vapor is present, this does not follow logically. Actual temperature changes have many drivers, but CO2 does not appear to be a significant driver at the levels or variations in levels present, and certainly can't have the amplifying effect claimed.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD




Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up





Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2132 | Replies: 969 | Views: 6956318
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English