Main Menu
Google Search
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

Science and Public Policy Institute

» Benefits of Atmospheric C02 Enrichment on Sunflowers

» Interactive Effects of C02 and Air Pollution on Wheat

» Response of Corals to Acidification: What Can Be Learned From Field Studies?

» Deserts: Are They Expanding Or Shrinking?

» Stewardship and Sustainable Development in a World of Rising Atmospheric C02

» The Response Of Enchinoderms to Ocean Acidification

» The Response of Peanut Plants to Changes in Climate and Atmospheric C02

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Coccolithophores

» Alpine Ecosystem Responses to Rising Temperature and Atmospheric C02

» Historic Trends in Global Sea Level

» Antarctic Sea Ice Trends

» Effects of Ocean Acidification and Warming on Corals (Laboratory Studies)

» Interactive Effects of C02 and Salinity on Plants

» Atmospheric C02 Enrichment: Boon or Bane of the Biosphere?

» Climate Model Inadequacies (Sea Ice)

» A C02-Enriched World of Worms

» Mammals in a C02-Enriched and Warmer World

» Climate Model Inadequacies of Earth's Radiative Budget

» Interactive Effects of C02 and Ozone on Birch Trees

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Crustaceans

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bivalves

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bacteria

» Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Utah

» Experimental Artifacts of Free-Air-C02-Enrichment (FACE) Studies

» The Extinction Risk for Stationary Plants

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis


» Shukla’s Gold

» Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20

» The “Blade” of Ocean2K

» The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”

» Op Ed on Deflategate

» Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?

» Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error

» Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline

» Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?

» Goodell and Deflategate Science



Global Warming News

» Paris Climate Conference: Fact Checking Obama’s Renewables Boast

» 2014: Lowest U.S. Severe Weather Death Toll in Ten Years

» Reports: Renewable Fuel Standard Imposes $22 Billion Ethanol Tax on Illinois, $42 Billion Tax on California

» Manchin Shoots Hole Through EPA Power Plant Rule

» NY AG Schneiderman vs. Peabody Energy: Climate Thuggery, Part 2

» NY Attorney General Schneiderman Targets Exxon Mobil: Climate Thuggery, Part 1

» Is War on Coal the Cause of Confounding Increase in U.S. Electricity Bills?

» Lomborg Exposes Paris Accord’s Climatological Insignificance

» A Positive EPA Platform for Presidential Hopefuls

» Antarctica: Still No Time to Sell the Beach House?








More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.


»George Soros, Tom Steyer are ‘investors’ in Obama’s new ‘clean’ energy research plan
»Skeptical Climate Documentary Set to Rock UN Climate Summit – ‘Climate Hustle’ To Have Red Carpet Premiere in Paris
Update: Climate Hustle's Marc Morano will be on Neil Cavuto's 'Your World' on Fox News today a ...
»Paris Is a High Point in Obama’s Environmental Quest – ‘Faces stiff opposition from GOP in Congress & from 20+ states challenging’ EPA
»Apocalyptic forecasts increase as climate change conference draws near
»Hamstrung by Congress, Obama tries to clinch climate pact
»France uses emergency laws to place climate activists under house arrest
»Father of UN climate process Maurice Strong dead at 86
»CNN Columnist John Sutter: ‘Climate change is a form of terror’
CNN's Sutter: 'Climate change is another form of terror -- and it's one we're wreaking on ours ...
»UN chief Ban Ki-moon: Climate change could have link with terrorism
»Irony: India accuses Obama of ‘carbon imperialism’

Date published: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:14:22 +0000

»The Paris Placebo Effect
Spoiler alert…the following contains spoilers about what the Paris COP21 climate conference this wee ...
»6″-10″ of Global Warming for Chicago, Detroit
Up to 20 million midwest U.S. residents are about to get some significant pre-Thanksgiving snowfall. ...
»Spencer Points Out Hypocrisy; Blogosphere & Twitterverse Explodes
There I was, minding my own business, just making some sarcastic remarks on Facebook alluding to the ...
»40 Years Ago Today: The Big Lake Never Gave Up Her Dead
Today is the 40th anniversary of the sinking of the Great Lakes freighter Edmund Fitzgerald, on Nove ...
»Atlantic Hurricanes Down 80% from 10 Years Ago
As the 2015 Atlantic hurricane season nears its end, and as we enter the 11th year without a major h ...
»Well Bam, There it Is: Exxon Mobil Investigated by NY Attorney General
I suppose this was inevitable, and Exxon Mobil probably expected it as well. According to the Justin ...
»Skiers Rejoice! Up to 12 ft. of Snow Expected in the West
A series of Pacific storms mixed with some cold Canadian air is expected to result in up to 12 feet ...
»Models vs. Observations: Plotting a Conspiracy?
John Christy and I received an email today from Marcel Crok, who presented our satellite observation ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for October 2015: +0.43 deg. C
NOTE: This is the seventh monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ol ...
»Color Satellite Shows Texas Floodwaters Entering the Gulf
Most of the rain that fell on southeast Texas (up to 20 inches) will end up flowing into the Gulf of ...

Date published: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 21:07:12 +0000

»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...

Date published: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:04 +0000

»China Burns Much More Coal Than Thought, Complicates COP21
New York Times BEIJING — China, the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases from coal, has been ...
»World’s bishops appeal to COP 21 delegates for ‘just and legally binding’ climate deal
National Catholic Reporter. The world’s bishops have a clear message for world leaders set, in barel ...
»Did A ‘Green’ Millionaire Persuade Sen. Ayotte To Support EPA’s Global Warming Rule?
By Michael Bastasch, Daily Caller EPA published a finalized version of its global warming rule in th ...
»France’s top weatherman sparks storm over book questioning climate change
By Henry Samuel, Telegraph Philippe Verdier, weather chief at France Televisions, the country ...
»Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
By Michael Bastasch – The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate sci ...

Date published: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:59:32 +0000

»Shukla’s Gold
Roger Pielke Jr recently made the remarkable discovery that, in addition to his university salary fr ...
»Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20
The RICO-20 gang of climate academics commenced its supposed campaign against misinformation with fa ...
»The “Blade” of Ocean2K
I’ve had a longstanding interest in high-resolution ocean proxies (with posts as early as 2005 ...
»The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”
The long-awaited (and long overdue) PAGES2K synthesis of 57 high-resolution ocean sediment series (O ...
»Op Ed on Deflategate
In Financial Post here. My submitted version was a little harsher. #deflategate For related blog pos ...
»Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?
In today’s post,  I’m going to show the Deflategate data from a new perspective.   Rathe ...
»Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error
On June 29, I sent a letter to Ted Wells, notifying him of the erroneous description of key figures ...
»Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline
In an earlier article,  I pointed out that essential figures in the Exponent report contained (what ...
»Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?
The transcript of the Brady appeal before Goodell has been released and it’s astonishing to se ...
»Goodell and Deflategate Science
Yesterday, Roger Goodell released his decision on the Brady appeal. Most of the early discussion has ...

Date published: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:44:02 +0000

»Benefits of Atmospheric C02 Enrichment on Sunflowers
The common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) is a large annual forb of the genus Helianthus. First domes ...
»Interactive Effects of C02 and Air Pollution on Wheat
Atmospheric CO2 enrichment typically enhances photosynthesis and biomass production in wheat (Tritic ...
»Response of Corals to Acidification: What Can Be Learned From Field Studies?
Most of the ocean acidification research conducted to date has focused solely on the biological impa ...
»Deserts: Are They Expanding Or Shrinking?
Back when the atmosphere’s CO2 concentration was approximately 340 ppm (up from a preindustrial valu ...
»Stewardship and Sustainable Development in a World of Rising Atmospheric C02
We’ve all seen the concepts acted out on television, heard them reported on the radio, and read abou ...
»The Response Of Enchinoderms to Ocean Acidification
As the air’s CO2 content rises in response to ever-increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and as mo ...
»The Response of Peanut Plants to Changes in Climate and Atmospheric C02
Nearly all agricultural crops respond to increases in the air's CO2 content by displaying enhanced r ...
»Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Coccolithophores
Coccolithophores are single-celled algae and protists that are found throughout the surface euphotic ...
»Alpine Ecosystem Responses to Rising Temperature and Atmospheric C02
A number of people are concerned that Earth's temperature will rise so high and so fast in response ...
»Historic Trends in Global Sea Level
Periodically, individual scientists and groups of scientists analyze global sets of sea level data t ...

Date published: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 23:22:27 +0000

»The Marc Morano movie “Climate Hustle” previewing in Paris during COP21
Skeptical Climate Documentary Set to Rock UN Climate Summit – ‘Climate Hustle’ To Have Red Carpet Pr ...
»Northern Hemisphere snow cover at end of Autumn
The extent of snow indicated by NOAA surprised me – what do readers think. Post any news of sn ...
»Australian wet December predicted in the face of “Godzilla” El Nino
I thought this BoM rainfall Outlook for December was interesting in view of widespread beating up of ...
»GreenLeft ALPABC confirms that blocking Australian coal exports will lead to an increase in global carbon dioxide emissions
Interesting example of the facts of the matter eventually making it into the light. Credit where cre ...
»Syria rain history – I think they have other problems
Like many I noticed Prince Charles repeating the claim that climate change is responsible for the ri ...
»Protected: Is there a more pointlessly stupid Govt decision than leasing the Port of Darwin for 99 years?
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
»Andrew Bolt was too critical of President Obama on his “The Bolt Report” TV show this morning
The exact point I want to make is that Andrew in his “The Panel” segment, was critical o ...
»Is this the best way to locate a needed nuclear waste storage facility ?
The ABC reports – Six sites shortlisted for Australia’s first nuclear waste dump; Govern ...
»BoM rain Outlook for Nov 2015 fails comprehensively in six days
Issued only on 29th October – the BoM rain Outlook for November crashed and burnt by the time ...
»New book – Australia’s Defence by David Archibald
David has sent me a 7.4MB 108 page pdf – great reading – many comparisons between the F- ...

Date published: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:05:45 +0000
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by PhilipSmith
When it comes to police flashlight, people may thi[more ...]
11/30 02:32

Posted by Anonymous
If you want to recover lost iPhone notes from iPho[more ...]
11/25 09:31

Posted by Anonymous
You may accidently deleted iPhone data and want to[more ...]
11/25 09:26

Posted by Anonymous
I recover sms from iPhone 5S with data recovery so[more ...]
11/20 08:20

Posted by JessonBill
Hi, Can I recover deleted text messages from iPhon[more ...]
11/07 19:00

Posted by Jesson Liu
Hey, do you folks know how to recoup erased photog[more ...]
11/07 18:58

Posted by Anonymous The insurance vendor w[more ...]
11/03 00:29

Posted by Anonymous The exposure will pay f[more ...]
11/03 00:28

Posted by Anonymous The rear seats[more ...]
11/03 00:27

Posted by Anonymous Certain Student ca[more ...]
11/03 00:26

Relevant Sponsors

Any Amount helps support improvements

* or *

Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Debunking the CO2 Feedback Myth - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Thursday 14 May 2009 - 16:27:59 // comment: 1 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on assumptions regarding future CO2 levels and that water vapor would provide a large positive feedback effect. Dr. Weinstein (former NASA Senior Research Scientist) shows how both of these assumptions are either wrong or greatly exaggerated. No Longer Supported

Debunking the CO2 Positive Feedback Myth

Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 11, 2009


The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on two assumptions:

  1. The atmospheric CO2 level would go from 290ppm in about 1850 to at least 580ppm in 2100.
  2. The increase in CO2 would have both a direct greenhouse gas effect, and trigger a positive feedback effect. The result would be a small direct increase in temperature from the CO2 , but the increased temperature would also result in an increase in water evaporation. The water vapor is the major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and its increase would further increase temperature, resulting in a positive feedback until the process self-limited at a significantly higher level.

The predicted direct CO2 effect is estimated to be about 1C for the doubling of CO2 level. The present level of about 388ppm would have already caused about half of the direct rise, since the effect is nonlinear. The global temperature has apparently increased by about 0.7ºC in the last 150 years, which is slightly more than the estimated direct CO2 effect, but far short of the expected feedback imposed value. In addition, the temperature level up to about 1850 was significantly lower than typical levels during the last several thousand years. Much of the period between about 1200 to 1850 has in fact been called the “Little Ice Age”. The abnormal low temperature starting point for the change makes the distinction between natural temperature rise due to a recovery from the abnormally low temperature to the present difficult to separate from CO2 and positive feedback induced increases. The CO2 increase was small until about 1940, so the positive contribution from the CO2 is based on an even smaller maximum temperature increase (about 0.3ºC) and a shorter time. All of these facts indicate that calculations of any CO2 effects and positive feedback additions would have badly missed the actual present temperature if we did not already know it.

The proposed solution to the discrepancy by the IPCC is that sulfate gas and particulate pollution from burning fossil fuels, have caused atmospheric “Global Dimming”, which greatly inhibited the correct level of warming. While this cannot be totally refuted, it is not specifically supportable either. Since the need for a strong positive feedback is needed to support the projections for the temperature rise to 2100, the mechanism for such a rise is examined.

Proposed mechanism for glacial to interglacial temperature increases:

It is very likely that over the last several hundred thousand years, axial tilt and precession in the Earth’s orbital motion (Milankovitch cycles). have triggered the transitions from glacial conditions (lasting about 100,000 years) to the significantly warmer inter-glacial periods (lasting 10,000 to 20,000 years) During the glacial cycles massive spreads of glaciers and ocean ice formed over large regions at higher latitudes, and the average Earth temperature was significantly lower than for the inter-glacial periods. The increase of average Solar insolation that occurred due to these orbital variations is not nearly sufficient to directly explain the rapid increase in global temperature, and the rapid melting of much of that ice. The variation has to have been triggered more by the change in distribution of the Solar insolation on the surface. However, once the transition was triggered, it has been hypothesized that some forms of positive feedback amplified the increase in temperature.

The most likely form of the initial trigger was due to local increases in ocean temperature in higher latitudes causing some of the marginal ocean ice to melt, and the increased absorption from the increased ocean area resulting in additional ocean absorption of Solar energy. This positive feedback was probably limited due to the small level of direct increased warming. However, the increased area of ocean and slight increased temperature also caused the water vapor pressure to slightly increase. Since water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas, this led to further temperature increases, resulting in a strong positive feedback. The increasing ocean temperature eventually resulted in large amounts of CO2 to be released, since the solubility of the water to CO2 is lower at higher temperature, and the oceans hold the vast majority of ocean+air CO2 . It appears that the large increase in CO2 lagged the overall increasing surface temperature by about 800 years or so. It is then proposed by some that the increased greenhouse effect, due to the increasing CO2 level, supercharged the positive feedback by resulting in more heating. This additional heating then released more water vapor, and the positive feedback then took off until some mechanism stopped the process (possibly cloud formation).

Present conditions and additional heating:

The present total greenhouse effect from water vapor, CO2, Methane, and other greenhouse gases is estimated to make the surface 33ºC warmer than a surface without greenhouse gases. The direct contribution from the CO2 is estimated to be about 2ºC. All greenhouse gases other than water vapor are estimated to be about 3ºC. Why would a small amount of CO2 , or all other gases than water vapor cause more of a positive feedback for heating that that due to the water vapor itself? If there is positive feedback from just the initial forcing, it would not require CO2 to do something strange, the water vapor would do it (i.e., heating causes more water vapor, which causes more heating, etc.).

Also, since water vapor is the main greenhouse gas, positive feedback would make an unstable system unless there was some mechanism that halted runaway conditions. It is likely that increased cloud formation, or even a haze condition caused by the water vapor, would decrease the effective Solar insolation so that a stable temperature is reached. Any increase in any greenhouse gas with changes small compared to the existing total would be self-limited by the water vapor limiting properties. The fact of a self-limiting process for this type of feedback can be seen by the following example. During a hot summer, the total water vapor content is much higher than for a cold winter. If there were no self-limiting mechanism, this would result in a runaway condition, which is not observed.

There is one way the small direct temperature increase from the CO2 could trigger a positive feedback (of limited scope). That would be if the small direct increase were world wide, and significantly decreased total global ice cover on the oceans. The total yearly average of the extent of ocean ice has only been measured for a few decades, and even though it has recently decreased somewhat, the present net effect is that less than 0.3 percent of the Earth’s surface has been exposed to a lower albedo (and thus higher absorption of energy), and this is at locations of very low Solar insolation. Most of even this ice area change is probably due to the natural variation, but the net change of absorbed energy is not sufficient to make a significant difference even if most of it was due to the CO2 increase. In addition, the melted area is now decreasing as we go into a multi-year cooling period. Historical records indicate this slight variation is not unusual over several decadal cycles.


Since water vapor is by far the largest greenhouse gas on the Earth, and since the Earth is mostly water covered, it is easy to see why the response of water to perturbations in the level and distribution of Solar insolation would be most important in the shift from glacial ages to interglacial periods. Reasonable arguments can be made for a strong positive feedback of water vapor to explain the rapid temperature increase during the transition. It is clear that such feedbacks are self-limiting, since the increase stops. However, the possible claim that the much smaller CO2 contribution, which even lags the sharp initial rise by many years, can then cause an even stronger positive feedback defies logic.

A recent significant increase of CO2, possibly with a large anthropogenic input, still results in a total less than 7% of the atmospheric greenhouse gas effect. Only about 1/3 of that is in the increase over the claimed "natural" levels. It is posited that this can somehow override the water vapor self-limiting mechanism by triggering a small increase in temperature to thus release more water vapor and supercharge a temperature rise to several times the direct effect of the CO2 itself. Since the self-limiting mechanism for the water vapor is present, this does not follow logically. Actual temperature changes have many drivers, but CO2 does not appear to be a significant driver at the levels or variations in levels present, and certainly can't have the amplifying effect claimed.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD

Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD

Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share - Where the Truth Heats Up

Latest Forum Posts

Threads: 2115 | Replies: 854 | Views: 6399345
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English