Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***
Science and Public Policy Institute

» A C02-Enriched World of Worms

» Mammals in a C02-Enriched and Warmer World

» Climate Model Inadequacies of Earth's Radiative Budget

» Interactive Effects of C02 and Ozone on Birch Trees

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Crustaceans

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bivalves

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bacteria

» Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Utah

» Experimental Artifacts of Free-Air-C02-Enrichment (FACE) Studies

» The Extinction Risk for Stationary Plants

» Benefits of Atmospheric C02 Enrichment on Strawberries

» Forest Growth Responses to Increasing Temperatures

» Stop Climate Fear Mongering

» Was 2014 the Warmest Year on Record? No, It Wasn't...

» Problems with Model Predictions of Species Extinctions

» The Influence of C02 on Plant Antioxidants

» Health Effects of Hot vs. Cold Temperatures in Asia

» Coral Reef Responses to Temperature and Stress: Thermal Adaptation

» Forest Growth Response to C02

» Onward Marches the Great Pause

» Response of Various Marine Animals to Ocean Acidification and Warming

» FACE Experiments and Grassland Species

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Fish

» Response of Fish to Ocean Warming

» Additional Grounds for Rejecting Biofuels

***
Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Implications of recent multimodel attribution studies for climate sensitivity

» Scientific American article: “How to Misinterpret Climate Change Research”

» Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 3

» Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 2

» Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 1

» Rahmstorf’s Third Trick

» Rahmstorf’s Second Trick

» Rahmstorf’s First Trick

» Jones and Dixon Refute Conspiracy Theorist Lewandowsky

» Reductio ad mannium

***
Watts Up With That?

» Eye roller study: ‘Climate-change skeptics are more ambivalent than we thought’

» Claim: Greenhouse gas-caused warming felt in just months

» Tuesday titter – Josh on the Stench of Green Subsidies

» New climate stress index model challenges doomsday forecasts for world’s coral reefs

» Solar plane flight aborted due to bad weather

» The Tomorrowland Climate Doom Movie: I watched it so you don’t have to

» Duelling Doctors – Contradictory Climate reports from Medics

» Grandma Learns About Data Adjustment: A little story about how data adjustment might work in everyday life.

» Greenpeace should stop fabricating global warming claims

» Ice core data shows the much feared +2°C climate ‘tipping point’ has already occurred…

» Is ‘Deliberate Deception’ An Unfair Description Of ‘Official’ IPCC Climate Science?

» Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #181

***
Global Warming News

» Slick & Cynical Rollout of “Clean Water Rule” Aptly Demonstrates Ultra-Political Nature of O’s EPA

» EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard Proposal Ignores Root Cause of Blend Wall

» Will EPA Scrap the Carbon Capture Mandate?

» EU Climate Policy: Unsustainability Update

» Tom Steyer’s Windfall Profits Tax: Recyling Junk Policy

» Ethanol Industry Ad Campaign: Fuels America or Fools America?

» Is Ethanol a Green Fuel?

» Independent Satellite Records Agree: Little to No Global Warming over Past 18 Years

» Clean Power Plan “Co-Benefits” Are as Insipid as the Rule’s Direct Benefits (i.e., the idiotic social cost of carbon)

» Clean Power Plan Litigation: Thoughts on Ripeness and Standing

***
Fox News - Climate Change Stories

***
Michelle Malkin - Enviro-Nitwits

» Martin O’Malley’s eco-sham confessional: Climate change is the ‘biggest business opportunity’ America has seen in a century

» ‘Climate change deniers’ mocked by obsequious CNN anchor interviewing fake scientist about manufactured crisis

» Obama: U.S. not losing to ISIS, but definitely getting pushed around by ‘climate change’

» Gore / great lakes

» Cher’d sacrifice: They don’t call ’em ‘green’ Hollywood libs for nothing

***
DailyTech Michael Asher`s blog

» Will the Real Antarctica Please Stand Up?

» Global Warming May Decrease Hurricanes, Research Suggests

» Japanese Report Disputes Human Cause for Global Warming

» Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979

» A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the (Climate) Forum

» Climate Report Downgrades Ice Loss; Media Reports Opposite

» Princeton Physicist Calls Global Warming Science "Mistaken"

» Defying Predictions, Sea Level Rise Begins to Slow

» Electric Car Sales in Freefall; Industry Risks Collapse

» Glaciers in Norway Growing Again

***
C3 - Climate Cycles Change

***
CATO - Global Warming

» Rating the GOP Contenders on Taxes

» New York Teachers Unions' 'Choice' Charade

» The Patriot Act Is Not Fit for Purpose. Nor Is Its Replacement.

» Marco Rubio and Rand Paul Pose Greatest Threat to Hillary Clinton

» The Symbolic Sunset & What’s Next for the USA Freedom Act

» Engaging Spokesmen Hone the Founders' Message of Limited Taxation

» US and China over Others' Territorial Disputes

» U.S. Should Offer to Talk While Kim Jong-Un Kills His Way to Power in North Korea

» Don't (Just) Let the Sun Go Down on Patriot Powers

» When Will Climate Scientists Say They Were Wrong?

» NSA Surveillance Programs Are a Cancer on the Constitution

» Wall Street Offers Very Real Benefits

» A So-So Republican Budget

» The Ultimate Irony: Is China the 'America' of Asia?

» NYT Shows No One Buys Government’s ‘Term of Art’ Argument in King v. Burwell

» Venezuela: No Rule of Law, Bad Money

» The 4 Percent-Plus Solution

» African Dawn Needs the Rule of Law

» 'Should We Have Waged the Iraq War?' Is Not a Gotcha Question

» Washington's Free-Riding East Asian Allies

» Memo to Congress: Don't Do Something, Just Stand There

» Cuomo's Dangerous Wage-Board Play Will Hurt the Workers He Says He Wants to Help

» Sen. Paul's Great Surveillance 'Filibuster' and What to Expect Next

» The Glaring (Ir)Relevance of Ramadi

» If You Don't Want Your Food Genetically Modified, Tell Nature to Stop It.

***
CanadaFreePress - Global Warming

» Europe’s Crazy Climate Policy Is Threatening Forests And Wildlife

» Drat…Now We Have to Ban Cows Too!

» New Study Confirms GWPF Report On Greening Sahel

» Environonsense—eco-faithful rant; DOD enforces EPA swiping water rights

***
More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Watch Now: Morano on One America News discusses Temperature Alterations
  Morano On Point with Tomi Lahren TV show on June 1, 2015: 'It used to be the old saying 'you ...
»Climate Depot Responds to Sen. Whitehouse: ‘The warmists have it exactly backwards. It is the global warming proponents who are guilty of the tobacco tactics.’
Democrat Sen. Whitehouse: Use RICO Laws to Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics Climate Depot Re ...
»Democrat Sen. Whitehouse: Use RICO Laws to Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
Sen. Whitehouse (D-RI): 'In 2006, Judge Gladys Kessler of the U.S. District Court for the Dist ...
»UN IPCC’s Pachauri found guilty in sexual harassment case by Internal Complaints Committee
»Global polar bear population size is about 26,000 (20,000-32,000)
'Upper limit for polar bear numbers worldwide could be more than 30,000...Relative to other species ...
»Save the world with legislation? Three quarters of worlds emissions “limited” by red-tape and meaningless targets
»Comprehensive Analysis Reveals NOAA Wrongfully Applying ‘Master Algorithm’ To Whitewash Temperature History
»New climate stress index model challenges doomsday forecasts for world’s coral reefs
»Update: Does skeptic smearer Naomi Oreskes have a conflict-of-interest disclosure problem?
»Pope’s climate position will hurt poor countries


Date published: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:22:00 +0000
Details

»TRMM Satellite Coming Home Next Month
NASA’s Tropical Rain Measuring Mission, the first satellite to carry a rain radar, has been on ...
»New Satellite Upper Troposphere Product: Still No Tropical “Hotspot”
One of the most vivid predictions of global warming theory is a “hotspot” in the tropica ...
»Iraq’s Largest Oil Refinery Still Burning After 5 Weeks
The latest NASA MODIS satellite imagery from today shows that the huge Baiji oil complex continues t ...
»Nearly 3,500 Days Since Major Hurricane Strike… Despite Record High CO2
As Subtropical Storm Ana churns off the southeast U.S. coast, the global atmosphere has exceeded 400 ...
»Mystery Climate Index #2 Explanation
Yesterday I presented this time series of climate data and asked if anyone could determine any physi ...
»Magical Mystery Climate Index #2
A little over a year ago I posted a climate riddle of sorts: a time series that showed warming, then ...
»This EcoNonsense Has To Stop
I was watching a Ford commercial last night that highlighted their “EcoBoost” engine technology, whi ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for April, 2015: +0.07 deg. C
NOTE: This is the first montly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the old V ...
»Is North Korea Cutting Down All Its Trees?
A secretive government can lie about many things, but it can’t hide its landscape from Earth o ...
»Version 6.0 of the UAH Temperature Dataset Released: New LT Trend = +0.11 C/decade
by Roy W. Spencer, John R. Christy, and William D. Braswell (a PDF version of this post is available ...


Date published: Fri, 22 May 2015 16:20:59 +0000
Details

»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at Forbes.com called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...
»Switching Back to Disqus
For a variety of reasons, I had to turn off Disqus a while back.  We are going back to it for commen ...


Date published: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:37:18 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Implications of recent multimodel attribution studies for climate sensitivity
Last year, a paper of mine (Lewis 2014) showing that the approach used in Frame et al (2005), which ...
»Scientific American article: “How to Misinterpret Climate Change Research”
A Scientific American article concerning Bjorn Stevens’ recent paper “Rethinking the low ...
»Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 3
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis In Part 1 I introduced the talk I gave at Ringberg 2015, explained wh ...
»Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 2
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis In Part 1 I introduced the talk I gave at Ringberg 2015, explained wh ...
»Pitfalls in climate sensitivity estimation: Part 1
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis As many readers will be aware, I attended the WCRP Grand Challenge Wo ...
»Rahmstorf’s Third Trick
Rahmstorf et al 2015 Figure 5 shows a coral d15N series from offshore Nova Scotia (see left panel be ...
»Rahmstorf’s Second Trick
The Rahmstorf et al reconstruction commences in AD900 even though the Mann et al 2009 reconstruction ...
»Rahmstorf’s First Trick
In any article by Mann and coauthors, it is always prudent to assume that even seemingly innocent ch ...
»Jones and Dixon Refute Conspiracy Theorist Lewandowsky
Jonathan Jones and Ruth Dixon have published (see Ruth’s blog here) a comment  in Psychologica ...
»Reductio ad mannium
The new article by Rahmstorf and Mann (see RC here) has been criticized at WUWT (here here) for maki ...


Date published: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:35:53 +0000
Details

»A C02-Enriched World of Worms
"Earthworms," in the words of Edwards (1988), "play a major role in improving and maintaining the fe ...
»Mammals in a C02-Enriched and Warmer World
We begin this brief analysis of the effects of global warming and atmospheric CO2 enrichment on Eart ...
»Climate Model Inadequacies of Earth's Radiative Budget
One of the most challenging and important problems facing today's general circulation models of the ...
»Interactive Effects of C02 and Ozone on Birch Trees
Trees grown in CO2-enriched air nearly always exhibit increased rates of photosynthesis and biomass ...
»Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Crustaceans
As the air’s CO2 content rises in response to ever-increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and as mo ...
»Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bivalves
As the air's CO2 content rises in response to ever-increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and as mo ...
»Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bacteria
Cyanobacteria-also known as blue-green algae, blue-green bacteria or Cyanophyta (the smallest of whi ...
»Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Utah
In this report, we review the long-term climate history of Utah and find little in the way of eviden ...
»Experimental Artifacts of Free-Air-C02-Enrichment (FACE) Studies
In a provocative paper they entitled "Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation w ...
»The Extinction Risk for Stationary Plants
In addition to migrating to more suitable locations, Earth’s plants have other ways of successfully ...


Date published: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:14:33 +0000
Details

»Are readers checking how the much prophesized El Nino is travelling ?
Remember on 12th May 2015 the Bureau of Meteorology BoM suddenly called an El Nino as being on for 2015. I thought at the time it was a sudden jumping on board the El Nino express for the BoM in the wake of NOAA’s earlier determination to have an El Nino. We have heard various […]
»How FIFA returned Sepp Blatter as President – a map worth seeing
From Radio Free Europe
»Canberra just smashes coldest night record for this early in June – 75 years of data from 1939
At least -6.5°C this morning – we will see official figure later – In 1987 both the 1st ...
»Coldest April night record broken twice in Hughenden and Maryborough in Queensland – various cold night records scattered across Australia through May too
The Courier Mail reported 22nd April – Several Queensland towns hit record low April temperatu ...
»2011 Grantham floods – how significant were breaches in the sand quarry wall
I saw the 60 Minutes segment on the 2011 Grantham floods last Sunday where they raised again the iss ...
»Increasing bank ripoffs exposed in differences between Visa Card purchase rates and RBA cash interest rate
A reader has sent me a spreadsheet that amazed me when I got around to examining the data. We have a ...
»Graphic placing the California drought in millenial perspective – from the San Jose Mercury News in January 2014
California drought: Past dry periods have lasted more than 200 years, scientists say Does anybody kn ...
»Greens ask the BoM Director Dorothy Dix questions at Senate estimates hearing which highlights that no MP’s have the guts to ask the BoM serious questions
The Canberra Times has this story – Bureau of Meteorology rejects Maurice Newman’s clima ...
»Example where the Australian Bureau of Meteorology is told about a fault in rain recording but in two years fail to correct their data
I was told by a reader about a loss of ~18mm rain recorded at Montague Island Lighthouse 69017 (NSW ...
»Why can’t the BoM decide on Canberra official temperatures in four days ?
This puzzles me – here we are Sunday morning the 24th May and the BoM can not settle on the ma ...


Date published: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 03:50:18 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
[quote][quote]You put certainly revolutionary idea[more ...]
05/14 11:08

Posted by Anonymous
Anonymous wrote ...You put certainly revolutionary[more ...]
05/12 23:28

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:27

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:25

Posted by Anonymous
[quote]You put certainly revolutionary ideas in th[more ...]
05/12 23:24

Posted by Anonymous
You put certainly revolutionary ideas in the post.[more ...]
05/12 06:06

Posted by Michael Bay
Have you guys ever considered the fact that maybe [more ...]
05/04 12:00

Posted by Anonymous
S L U T
05/04 11:22

Posted by Anonymous
[censored]
05/04 11:17

Posted by Bruce Norris
Great examine post! That’s most significant detail[more ...]
04/05 23:52

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Debunking the CO2 Feedback Myth - by Leonard Weinstein, ScD
Admin, Thursday 14 May 2009 - 16:27:59 // comment: 1 //     printer friendly   //     Font Size - Increase / Decrease / Reset

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on assumptions regarding future CO2 levels and that water vapor would provide a large positive feedback effect. Dr. Weinstein (former NASA Senior Research Scientist) shows how both of these assumptions are either wrong or greatly exaggerated. No Longer Supported

Debunking the CO2 Positive Feedback Myth

Leonard Weinstein, ScD
May 11, 2009



Introduction:

The climate models used in the IPCC reports have made predictions of increases in global temperature of 2ºC to 6ºC over present levels by 2100. These predictions were based on two assumptions:

  1. The atmospheric CO2 level would go from 290ppm in about 1850 to at least 580ppm in 2100.
  2. The increase in CO2 would have both a direct greenhouse gas effect, and trigger a positive feedback effect. The result would be a small direct increase in temperature from the CO2 , but the increased temperature would also result in an increase in water evaporation. The water vapor is the major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and its increase would further increase temperature, resulting in a positive feedback until the process self-limited at a significantly higher level.

The predicted direct CO2 effect is estimated to be about 1C for the doubling of CO2 level. The present level of about 388ppm would have already caused about half of the direct rise, since the effect is nonlinear. The global temperature has apparently increased by about 0.7ºC in the last 150 years, which is slightly more than the estimated direct CO2 effect, but far short of the expected feedback imposed value. In addition, the temperature level up to about 1850 was significantly lower than typical levels during the last several thousand years. Much of the period between about 1200 to 1850 has in fact been called the “Little Ice Age”. The abnormal low temperature starting point for the change makes the distinction between natural temperature rise due to a recovery from the abnormally low temperature to the present difficult to separate from CO2 and positive feedback induced increases. The CO2 increase was small until about 1940, so the positive contribution from the CO2 is based on an even smaller maximum temperature increase (about 0.3ºC) and a shorter time. All of these facts indicate that calculations of any CO2 effects and positive feedback additions would have badly missed the actual present temperature if we did not already know it.

The proposed solution to the discrepancy by the IPCC is that sulfate gas and particulate pollution from burning fossil fuels, have caused atmospheric “Global Dimming”, which greatly inhibited the correct level of warming. While this cannot be totally refuted, it is not specifically supportable either. Since the need for a strong positive feedback is needed to support the projections for the temperature rise to 2100, the mechanism for such a rise is examined.


Proposed mechanism for glacial to interglacial temperature increases:

It is very likely that over the last several hundred thousand years, axial tilt and precession in the Earth’s orbital motion (Milankovitch cycles). have triggered the transitions from glacial conditions (lasting about 100,000 years) to the significantly warmer inter-glacial periods (lasting 10,000 to 20,000 years) During the glacial cycles massive spreads of glaciers and ocean ice formed over large regions at higher latitudes, and the average Earth temperature was significantly lower than for the inter-glacial periods. The increase of average Solar insolation that occurred due to these orbital variations is not nearly sufficient to directly explain the rapid increase in global temperature, and the rapid melting of much of that ice. The variation has to have been triggered more by the change in distribution of the Solar insolation on the surface. However, once the transition was triggered, it has been hypothesized that some forms of positive feedback amplified the increase in temperature.

The most likely form of the initial trigger was due to local increases in ocean temperature in higher latitudes causing some of the marginal ocean ice to melt, and the increased absorption from the increased ocean area resulting in additional ocean absorption of Solar energy. This positive feedback was probably limited due to the small level of direct increased warming. However, the increased area of ocean and slight increased temperature also caused the water vapor pressure to slightly increase. Since water vapor is a strong greenhouse gas, this led to further temperature increases, resulting in a strong positive feedback. The increasing ocean temperature eventually resulted in large amounts of CO2 to be released, since the solubility of the water to CO2 is lower at higher temperature, and the oceans hold the vast majority of ocean+air CO2 . It appears that the large increase in CO2 lagged the overall increasing surface temperature by about 800 years or so. It is then proposed by some that the increased greenhouse effect, due to the increasing CO2 level, supercharged the positive feedback by resulting in more heating. This additional heating then released more water vapor, and the positive feedback then took off until some mechanism stopped the process (possibly cloud formation).


Present conditions and additional heating:

The present total greenhouse effect from water vapor, CO2, Methane, and other greenhouse gases is estimated to make the surface 33ºC warmer than a surface without greenhouse gases. The direct contribution from the CO2 is estimated to be about 2ºC. All greenhouse gases other than water vapor are estimated to be about 3ºC. Why would a small amount of CO2 , or all other gases than water vapor cause more of a positive feedback for heating that that due to the water vapor itself? If there is positive feedback from just the initial forcing, it would not require CO2 to do something strange, the water vapor would do it (i.e., heating causes more water vapor, which causes more heating, etc.).

Also, since water vapor is the main greenhouse gas, positive feedback would make an unstable system unless there was some mechanism that halted runaway conditions. It is likely that increased cloud formation, or even a haze condition caused by the water vapor, would decrease the effective Solar insolation so that a stable temperature is reached. Any increase in any greenhouse gas with changes small compared to the existing total would be self-limited by the water vapor limiting properties. The fact of a self-limiting process for this type of feedback can be seen by the following example. During a hot summer, the total water vapor content is much higher than for a cold winter. If there were no self-limiting mechanism, this would result in a runaway condition, which is not observed.

There is one way the small direct temperature increase from the CO2 could trigger a positive feedback (of limited scope). That would be if the small direct increase were world wide, and significantly decreased total global ice cover on the oceans. The total yearly average of the extent of ocean ice has only been measured for a few decades, and even though it has recently decreased somewhat, the present net effect is that less than 0.3 percent of the Earth’s surface has been exposed to a lower albedo (and thus higher absorption of energy), and this is at locations of very low Solar insolation. Most of even this ice area change is probably due to the natural variation, but the net change of absorbed energy is not sufficient to make a significant difference even if most of it was due to the CO2 increase. In addition, the melted area is now decreasing as we go into a multi-year cooling period. Historical records indicate this slight variation is not unusual over several decadal cycles.


Conclusion:

Since water vapor is by far the largest greenhouse gas on the Earth, and since the Earth is mostly water covered, it is easy to see why the response of water to perturbations in the level and distribution of Solar insolation would be most important in the shift from glacial ages to interglacial periods. Reasonable arguments can be made for a strong positive feedback of water vapor to explain the rapid temperature increase during the transition. It is clear that such feedbacks are self-limiting, since the increase stops. However, the possible claim that the much smaller CO2 contribution, which even lags the sharp initial rise by many years, can then cause an even stronger positive feedback defies logic.

A recent significant increase of CO2, possibly with a large anthropogenic input, still results in a total less than 7% of the atmospheric greenhouse gas effect. Only about 1/3 of that is in the increase over the claimed "natural" levels. It is posited that this can somehow override the water vapor self-limiting mechanism by triggering a small increase in temperature to thus release more water vapor and supercharge a temperature rise to several times the direct effect of the CO2 itself. Since the self-limiting mechanism for the water vapor is present, this does not follow logically. Actual temperature changes have many drivers, but CO2 does not appear to be a significant driver at the levels or variations in levels present, and certainly can't have the amplifying effect claimed.

Click here for a brief Bio of Leonard Weinstein, ScD




Reprinted here with the permission of Leonard Weinstein, ScD


Share or Bookmark this Article Using:
| furl furl | reddit reddit | del.icio.us del.icio.us | magnoliacom magnoliacom | digg digg | newsvine newsvine | Stumble_it Stumble_it | Facebook Facebook | Google Google | Fark Fark | Sphere Sphere | Netscape Netscape | Technorati Technorati | Yahoo! Yahoo! | Add to Favorites and Additional Bookmarks: Share GlobalWarmingHoax.com - Where the Truth Heats Up





Latest Forum Posts


Threads: 2106 | Replies: 833 | Views: 5722489
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English