Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

***
Science and Public Policy Institute

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bivalves

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bacteria

» Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Utah

» Experimental Artifacts of Free-Air-C02-Enrichment (FACE) Studies

» The Extinction Risk for Stationary Plants

» Benefits of Atmospheric C02 Enrichment on Strawberries

» Forest Growth Responses to Increasing Temperatures

» Stop Climate Fear Mongering

» Was 2014 the Warmest Year on Record? No, It Wasn't...

» Problems with Model Predictions of Species Extinctions

» The Influence of C02 on Plant Antioxidants

» Health Effects of Hot vs. Cold Temperatures in Asia

» Coral Reef Responses to Temperature and Stress: Thermal Adaptation

» Forest Growth Response to C02

» Onward Marches the Great Pause

» Response of Various Marine Animals to Ocean Acidification and Warming

» FACE Experiments and Grassland Species

» Effects of Ocean Acidification on Fish

» Response of Fish to Ocean Warming

» Additional Grounds for Rejecting Biofuels

» The Global Medieval Warm Period

» Growth Rates of Old Versus Young Forest Trees

» Water Use Efficiency of Agricultural Species

» Tropical Trees

» Global Temperatures and Biospheric Productivity

***
Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***
Climate Audit

» Jones and Dixon Refute Conspiracy Theorist Lewandowsky

» Reductio ad mannium

» How Weaver Ignored Corcoran’s Segue

» The implications for climate sensitivity of Bjorn Stevens’ new aerosol forcing paper

» Weaver: “I do not lobby for more climate funding”

» Another Upside-Down PAGES2K Non-Corrigendum

» Weaver’s Next Generation Climate Model: Breaking News!!

» Weaver Suggests Buddy Review for Mann et al 2005

» Brandon’s ebook on the Hockey Stick

» Josh: Andrew, Put on your big boy pants

***
Watts Up With That?

» The Desert Finder

» Study: Climate change does not cause extreme winters

» Outrageous: NOAA demands $262,000 fee for looking at their ‘public’ data

» Finally: peer reviewed pushback against the Lewandowsky, Oberauer, and Gignac paper

» Climate skeptic scientists push back against ‘witch hunt’

» Laughable AGU Claim: 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami ‘spurred global warming’

» Climate FAIL: Gallup poll shows global warming concerns dead last

» National Association of Scholars says ‘The fossil fuel divestment movement, is an exercise in futility.’

» Richard Tol’s Excellent Summary of the Flaws in Cook et al. (2013) – The Infamous 97% Consensus Paper

» Amazing study of the IPCC and media concludes: “…reception and coverage in the media has varied widely.”

» NASA refutes Mann and Rahmstorf – Finds Atlantic ‘Conveyor Belt’ Not Slowing

» Ocean Acidification: Natural Cycles and Ubiquitous Uncertainties

***
Global Warming News

» Free Market Groups Take Aim at Obama Guidance on NEPA Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

» Respectfully Rebutting Professor Revesz on EPA’s Clean Power Plan

» EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Whitman Goes Orwell on McConnell

» Sen. Cruz and Rep. Bridenstine Introduce American Energy Renaissance Act

» AP Analysis: Obama Administration Sets Record for Flouting Freedom of Information Act

» Introducing VICE News to 2012 Debate Obama (the one who ran to the right of Romney on AGW/energy)

» Root Cause of Ethanol ‘Blend Wall’? Consumers Don’t Like Rip Offs

» CEI Files Suit over EPA’s Glacial “Richard Windsor” Production

» Pound for Pound, the Worst EPA Regulation During the Obama Administration Is…

» The Possible Mootness of Mitch McConnell’s Missive to States Regarding Non-Compliance with the Clean Power Plan

***
Fox News - Climate Change Stories

***
Michelle Malkin - Enviro-Nitwits

» Heir apparent to Al Gore proves he’s totally up to the challenge

» Maybe the EPA will fulfill FOIA requests after they’re done trying to regulate your grill emissions

» Guess what might be to blame for the rise of ISIS

» Starbucks working diligently to protect the planet from threat posed by whipped cream

» Great Lakes’ failure to cooperate with Al Gore’s doomsday alarmism a sure sign of climate change, says Bill Nye

***
DailyTech Michael Asher`s blog

» Will the Real Antarctica Please Stand Up?

» Global Warming May Decrease Hurricanes, Research Suggests

» Japanese Report Disputes Human Cause for Global Warming

» Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979

» A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the (Climate) Forum

» Climate Report Downgrades Ice Loss; Media Reports Opposite

» Princeton Physicist Calls Global Warming Science "Mistaken"

» Defying Predictions, Sea Level Rise Begins to Slow

» Electric Car Sales in Freefall; Industry Risks Collapse

» Glaciers in Norway Growing Again

***
C3 - Climate Cycles Change

***
CATO - Global Warming

» Politico Presents …. Washington Lobbyists!

» How about Spending Cuts Instead of Sanders's War Tax?

» FEMA Tells Oklahoma to Do the Impossible ... Or Else

» The SGR Fix Will Bust the Budget

» The Monetary Approach Reigns Supreme

» China Needs More Market -- and Individualism -- and Less State

» Ex-Im Bank Taxes Mississippi’s Manufacturers

» Export-Import Bank Costly to Pennsylvania Businesses

» Hold Politicians Accountable for Libya Debacle

» Obamacare: Not as Bad as It Could Have Been, But Still Awful

» Game on: How to Devise International Investment Law

» This Phone Hacking Device Is out of Control

» Legislators Move against Mass Surveillance

» FEMA Asks Louisiana to Do the Impossible -- Or Else

» FEMA Is Asking Mississippi to Do the Impossible ... Or Lose Disaster Aid

» The Truth about Infrastructure

» Whitehouse Threatens Scientific Freedom

» Supreme Court Must Reconsider UT's Admissions Policy

» Russia and North Korea Play Nice: Vladimir Putin's Ukrainian Dance with Kim Jong-un

» Tehran, though an Ugly Regime, Does Not Threaten America.

» Why Offensive Speech Is Valuable

» Libertarians and the Struggle for Women's Rights

» Our Unrealistic Foreign Policy

» Surprising Peru

» Mandatory Voting Guarantees Ignorant Votes

***
CanadaFreePress - Global Warming

» Obama’s FEMA Dir. Sounds Like GOP ‘Denier’!?

» Population Control in the Name of Sustainable Development

» WH Rally v. Arctic Drilling: Global Warming Is ‘Absolutely’ ‘Settled Science’ Despite Ch

***
More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»Pointman: Warmists have ‘lost it. Going forward, you might as well be warned, it’s going to get a lot uglier as they go down’
»Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal
»New AP Stylebook Entry on ‘Global Warming’, ‘Climate Change’ Doesn’t Go Over Well With Many: ‘So Full of Bull’
AP claims '90 percent of the peer-reviewed scientific literature' supports global warming.
»Review ‘Merchant’s of Doubt': Film ‘engages in the very character assassination techniques that they show are favored by the other side’
»Watch: Bill Nye: We need a carbon tax to ‘redistribute wealth’
Speaking to students at the University at Albany, Bill Nye the Science Guy said that a carbon tax wa ...
»Kerry Warns US Ambassador They Will Be Dealing With ‘Climate Refugees’
"There’ll be climate refugees that all of you will be coping with at some point, if not now, in the ...
»AP: Six Flags to cut 18,000 trees to go solar
'Will be the largest solar farm in New Jersey'
»In 1974, Paul Ehrlich told the U.S. Senate he wouldn’t bet a nickel U.S. still around in 1994
Ehrlich to U.S. Senate 1974: 'If we have 20 years -- which I wouldn't put a nickel on -- but if we h ...
»Study in Journal Climate: Climate change does not cause extreme winters
Cold snaps like the ones that hit the eastern United States in the past winters are not a consequenc ...
»Networks Say Nothing As Congressional Democrats Bully Climate Skeptics


Date published: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:28:12 +0000
Details

»This is Your President’s Science Advisor
A President’s political appointees are chosen because their views support the President ...
»Color Satellite View of Solar Eclipse
Here’s a NASA MODIS view of this morning’s solar eclipse from the Terra polar-orbiting s ...
»Bring Back Our Tornadoes!
One of the many tragic consequences of human-caused climate change is the nearly unprecedented lack ...
»Atlas Shrugged, Net Neutrality, and Government Controlled Science
There’s an amazing article by Robert Tracinski at TheFederalist.com which draws powerful paral ...
»Most Spectacular Auroras of this Solar Cycle Last Night
Last night’s aurora event is being described by many as the most spectacular of this solar cyc ...
»St. Pat’s Day Greeted with Green Aurora, Severe Geomagnetic Storm
A coronal mass ejection (CME) from the sun just arrived at Earth this morning, producing aurora and ...
»What if Boston Had Record Low Snowfall?
By yesterday evening, Boston officially received its greatest seasonal snowfall on record, 108.6 inc ...
»Even Though Warming Has Stopped, it Keeps Getting Worse?
I was updating a U.S. Corn Belt summer temperature and precipitation dataset from the NCDC website, ...
»Worst Dust Storm in 12 Years Hits Oman
A spectacular satellite view of the dust storm that hit portions of Oman yesterday. High winds comin ...
»Extraordinary Color View of Eastern U.S. Snow Cover
Much of the Eastern U.S. finally had a clear day yesterday (March 6, 2015) , allowing the NASA MODIS ...


Date published: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:30:50 +0000
Details

»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at Forbes.com called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...
»Switching Back to Disqus
For a variety of reasons, I had to turn off Disqus a while back.  We are going back to it for commen ...


Date published: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:37:18 +0000
Details




Date published: not known
Details

»Jones and Dixon Refute Conspiracy Theorist Lewandowsky
Jonathan Jones and Ruth Dixon have published (see Ruth’s blog here) a comment  in Psychologica ...
»Reductio ad mannium
The new article by Rahmstorf and Mann (see RC here) has been criticized at WUWT (here here) for maki ...
»How Weaver Ignored Corcoran’s Segue
Four of the incidents in J Burke’s background chronology in Weaver v National Post (the Januar ...
»The implications for climate sensitivity of Bjorn Stevens’ new aerosol forcing paper
A guest post by Nicholas Lewis  In a paper published last year (Lewis & Curry 2014), discussed h ...
»Weaver: “I do not lobby for more climate funding”
J Burke’s decision contains a chronology of prior interactions between Weaver and National Pos ...
»Another Upside-Down PAGES2K Non-Corrigendum
Kaufman and McKay recently and quietly issued an Arctic2K correction file at NOAA xls here that conc ...
»Weaver’s Next Generation Climate Model: Breaking News!!
According to the University of Victoria, Andrew Weaver says: the next generation of his climate mode ...
»Weaver Suggests Buddy Review for Mann et al 2005
Coauthors of Rutherford et al (J Climate 2005) (pdf) were Rutherford, Mann, Bradley, Hughes, Jones, ...
»Brandon’s ebook on the Hockey Stick
  A couple of years ago, Brandon Shollenberger  wrote up a lengthy review of Mann’s Hocke ...
»Josh: Andrew, Put on your big boy pants
    Josh portrays what a sensible decision in Weaver v National Post would have looked lik ...


Date published: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:46:06 +0000
Details

»Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bivalves
As the air's CO2 content rises in response to ever-increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and as mo ...
»Effects of Ocean Acidification on Marine Bacteria
Cyanobacteria-also known as blue-green algae, blue-green bacteria or Cyanophyta (the smallest of whi ...
»Observed Climate Change and the Negligible Global Effect of Greenhouse-gas Emission Limits in the State of Utah
In this report, we review the long-term climate history of Utah and find little in the way of eviden ...
»Experimental Artifacts of Free-Air-C02-Enrichment (FACE) Studies
In a provocative paper they entitled "Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation w ...
»The Extinction Risk for Stationary Plants
In addition to migrating to more suitable locations, Earth’s plants have other ways of successfully ...
»Benefits of Atmospheric C02 Enrichment on Strawberries
Nearly all agricultural plants benefit from increases in the air's CO2 content and strawberry (Fraga ...
»Forest Growth Responses to Increasing Temperatures
It has been claimed that CO2-induced global warming will be so great and so rapid that many of Earth ...
»Stop Climate Fear Mongering
The massively funded international global warming movement has grossly exaggerated the threat from C ...
»Was 2014 the Warmest Year on Record? No, It Wasn't...
Nature trumpets “2014 was the hottest year on record,” citing the Japan Meteorological Agency, the W ...
»Problems with Model Predictions of Species Extinctions
The world's climate alarmists contend that CO2-induced global warming will lead to numerous extincti ...


Date published: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 11:43:59 +0000
Details

»Australian Bureau of Meteorology rain Outlooks – failure looming in March and flip-flop confusion for April
In late February the BoM forecast March and April rain as follows. Now rain to date for March (1st t ...
»Collected articles by David Archibald – Climate, Defence, Geostratigic, Liquid Fuel Security, Civilisation
I always enjoy reading what David has to say – here are links to his writings. His book ...
»Reading The ANZUS Treaty
Guest post from David Archibald – Senator David Johnston’s dismissal as Australia’s Defence Mi ...
»Bearing in mind Hillary Clinton’s email issues – could Al Gore run for President in 2016 ?
I am surprised this possibility is not getting more exposure. Here is a pro – And against ...
»Merchants of Doubt movie box office triumph in USA – takes $54,242 – where can I get the DVD
Would that pay for theatre hire? I can not wait to see Marc Morano in Merchants of Doubt – in ...
»A reminder of global temperature trends through geologic time
Puts where we are now in perspective. I found myself looking for paleoclimate data from Australia ...
»Grounded icebergs litter the Cape Cod coast
USA Today marvels at – Icebergs in Mass? Huge ice chunks seen on Cape Cod Does anybody know ho ...
»Is the media over-reporting the Twiggy Forrest campaign to better use water resources in northern Australia ?
The ABC reports – Andrew ‘Twiggy’ Forrest calls for harvesting of rivers, undergro ...
»The ABC hosts the BoM prattling on about a warmer than average Autumn for Canberra but ignores inconvenient fact that the BoM summer Outlook failed for the ACT region
Canberra set for warmer than average autumn due to rise in ocean temperatures: Bureau of Meteorology ...
»Giant US climate group NOAA jumps the shark claiming El Nino has arrived
NOAA: Elusive El Niño arrives – While the 30 day SOI is near neutral? In view that NOAA and ma ...


Date published: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 05:46:34 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
Exceptional work! Such kind of information is esta[more ...]
03/20 02:17

Posted by Anonymous
[ REQUIRES ADMIN APPROVAL ]
03/12 23:31

Posted by Anonymous
Fag
03/12 23:19

Posted by Anonymous
Anonymous wrote ...Awesome publish! I like this pa[more ...]
02/09 23:17

Posted by Anonymous
Awesome publish! I like this particular; the readi[more ...]
02/09 23:15

Posted by Anonymous
nice post
01/16 02:00

Posted by Hazel Perry
Great examine post! That’s most significant detai[more ...]
01/16 01:59

Posted by Anonymous
Great examine post! That’s most significant detai[more ...]
01/16 01:58

Posted by Anonymous
Admired writing skill! This article is honestly a [more ...]
01/05 03:29

Posted by Anonymous
Studying this info! From the beginning to the end,[more ...]
01/05 03:22

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Forums
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>   
Layman's science

Author Post
ron
Fri Jun 19 2009, 09:13PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
Often is the time where the common man, such as myself, is disenfranchised from scientific debate because we lack the creds, such as a BS, MS, or PhD addended to our name.

That's never stopped me. I've been to college a few times. I am an electrician and started doing electrical work in March of 1983. I have been studying electricity, electrical theory, electronics, physics, and math since about Ocotber of 1974. It was a pivotal year. We moved from California to Texas and my step-grandfather began giving me books and introducing me to that most wonderous treasure, the public libray. You can read about anything you want to learn and no one can stop you.

In organized education and on my own, I have also studied particle physics, linear algebra, n-space geometry, topology, mult0-variable calculus. I've studied a few years of german and have read Einstein's notes in English and the original German. And I have studied basic physics. For the most part, most of us can get by with Newton. When it comes to electrical work, the Bohr model is accurate enough to do what we do. Quantum Mechanics offers some interesting interpretations but if you are an electrician working on an energized circuit, you are safer viewing it from the Bohr perspective.

Anyway, my lack of credentials has not stopped me from reading and trying to understand topics such as global climate. And my background of science and math studies makes it hard for me to ignore the glaring inconsistencies and faults of what I see in the AGW mindset. Granted, we can influence our local environment greatly. I know I have. At times, I've had an attack of gas that ran everyone off. Now, that's influencing the local environment. But it doesn't change the world, at large.

At the basis of science is the practice of observation and the use of the scientific method in testing theories and hypotheses. Collect evidence and make a theory. Test the theory. It may hold until other evidence comes along. If evidence invalidates the theory, either adjust the theory or scrap it all together and make a new theory that accounts for the new evidence, as well as the old evidence. That is science. To adjust data to fit a theory is fantasy. And I see that happening with AGW. It doesn't matter what the evidence is, it is interpreted as supporting AGW. All they have to do is adjust their equations or dream a new causality and their theory is safe, once again. Well, that's just fantasy. Ordinarily, it would be something to chuckle at. The scary thing, is that is has become political and an industry.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jun 20 2009, 08:46AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
Many people do not understand the process of feedback, nor have they been studying electron behavior for as long as I have. There are essentially two types of feed back. Positive feedback and negative feedback. In electronics, the feedback is set by how a transistor is biased for operation. It is often used to modulate a waveform or action. In a transistor operating as an amplifier, the source and the collector are operating at a power factor larger than the input. All the input does is introduce changes of charge in the gate or grid. The change of a few microvolts creates changes in what conducts across the junction. This is negative feedback. In positive feedback the junctions would conduct into saturation, such as the old flip-flop circuits upon which modern computers are based. Those are actually basic simple processes to understand.

In climate, however, there are more factors at play. Clouds are a great example of negative feedback. A cloudy day does several things. The cloud cover holds in some heat from the ground but it also reflects heat back into space from the topside. So, it may not get too hot but it will also not get too cold. That is, the response to one stimulus creates another response that has a remediating or sometimes opposite effect that prevents something from cycling out of control. To the greatest extent, that is how nature works. Concepts of physics and thermodynamics can most easily be described as whether or not something is acted upon by an outside force. The mistake most often made by some people in considering what the climate does is that they do not consider the most powerful outside source, an uncontrolled nuclear reactor 94 million miles above our heads. The ones who say that it doesn't influence us much are simply wrong. That's not an insult or a political point, they are simply wrong. The eruption of one volcano in the effect of reflective aerosols reflecting heat back to space can create a temporary climate change here simply by reducing the amount of sunlight that gets through.

But feedback has a modulating effect. A particular warm season can cause more ice to melt, which changes temp and salinity in the ocean which changes currents and evaporation rates which changes could formation, rain events, cloud cover. And those are mechanisms that have moderating effects. More cloud cover equals more temp equilibrium, more rain, more precipitation in cold climates, which creates more snow and ice that reflect more heat away creating even colder temperatures. Negative feedback.
Back to top
Denny
Sat Jun 20 2009, 06:58PM
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Ron, great posts, both of them...keep it up! We appreciate the input!

Denny
Back to top
ron
Sun Jun 21 2009, 07:54AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
Thanks, Denny. I think if I can explain in layman terms, others can understand it easier. Much of actual evidence is displayed in dot graphs and mathematical concepts, which is a language all it's own, but I try to keep things simple, at least for myself.

One of the biggest mistakes in the AGW is a difference of pardigm that does, in fact, ignore the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. AGW believers treat the Earth as a closed system, which it is not. Yes, we have an atmosphere and magnetic belt, but those don't seal us off from the universe at large. Changes in the Sun's behavior do have an effect here. To deny that is to close your eyes and say the sun is not shining. Doing that is like the kid who plugs his ears and says "nanner nanner" so he doesn't have to hear what the adults are saying. Pretending something doesn't exist does not actually make it go away.

Along with the cessation of sunspot activity, there is also precession of orbits. Earth's orbit is not a perfect circle and it varies from slight eliptic to more eliptic. Also, the sun has it's own orbit and does not spin in one exact geometric spot. So, there will be times when the sun is farther away and we are farther and the sunpost cycle is low. And this will have an effect on the weather. It will get colder and all the coal-fired power plants in the world can't stop it. In the not too distant future, we will be praying for some global warming.

Changes may not happen right away. It's June here in Texas. The jetstream has set a ridge over us so the warm air comes from the south and the high pressure and temp inversion knocks down any storms. So, we have highs in the 90's. But summers could drop off gradually. We usually get days and weeks of 100 + F and we call that August. At first, we may only get a few number of days over 100. But year after year a pattern will develope. So, some might say, yeah right. Time will tell. We've already had colder than average winters recently.

Warming is not the problem. Plants grow like crazy when you give them sun, CO2, and water. They don't grow much at all when covered in snow or in temps that don't get above 65 F. That's why people build solariums and hot houses. So they can grow plants in winter, by trapping heat.

Something interesting I have read. Most every knows that CO2 only absorbs and re-emits readiation at a few distinct frequencies. Furthermore, it reaches a saturation point, for lack of a better description. It only absorbs and re-emits to a certain level and is incapable of absorbing more heat or radiation more heat. As a "greenhouse gas," it leaves much to be desired. Or, in other words, at a certain point, it is transparent to heat. It cannot contribute much of anything to global warming.

No, the CO2 scare is thanks to Gore, who didn't get to be president but is still hell-bent on power.
Back to top
Denny
Sun Jun 21 2009, 03:31PM
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Say AMEN! I like your Common Sense! Stick around, we need you here!
Back to top
ron
Tue Jun 23 2009, 07:23PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
A question was raised and not answered in the chatbox. The Med Warm period was much warmer than today and more CO2 was in much more abundance, in spite of the current AGW desire to re-align graphs and show that we are near that now. Anyway, the question was asked, how come much higher levels of CO2 did not cause runaway warming and why did the globe, in fact, cool from that? The short answer is that CO2 is not the greenhouse gas that many imagine it to be. And that the sun has more effect than some can admit. And that nature operates on negative feedback. To argue against the past of nature is foolish and unscientific. But you can't hardly stop religious frenzy that wishes to believe one thing regardless of all evidence.
Back to top
ron
Tue Jun 23 2009, 07:33PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
I suppose I can make these layman viewpoints because if someone can, with no doubt, a serious face, contend that CO2 precedes temp, i.e., make statements of fantasy (statements that may or may not coincide with science) then I can certainly put my two cents in there.

Simple fact of the matter is that despite theories that the polar cap sea ice could melt, Caps are growing thicker, glaciers are growing thicker, we have had two record breaking winters in a row. Snow in Iraq? Normally, one could read something like that in science fiction, like that movie with Dennis Quaid where it is snowing in the desert. But now, that actually happened just recently. Snow in North Dakota in June? Don't be silly. Oops, that happened a few weeks ago.

And incredibly cold and nasty weather down under. Normally, Christchurch, New Zealand is the last port of call before going to Antarctica. But sometimes, it's to cold in the southern hemisphere's winter to accomplish much.

The signs are ripe for an ice age. The sun, the cycles of ice ages, the signs, here and there. I do not see cold, snowy winters as a sign of global warming. That's like saying that it's night time because the sun is out. Then again, if it is a matter of faith, one coud say just about anything and justify it.

The other problem I have is with the use of math to support a theory rather than describe an effect. What happens modernly, is that the evidence doesn't fit the theory so the math is adjusted until it does fit. That isn't science. That is fiction, fantasy. And math's weakness is that you can use it to state anything. The Rev. Billy Graham once used the equation 1^3 to show how God could be a trinity. The problem is, the general function is 1^n, which would also prove polytheism, which was not his intent but there you go. Just because someone can use an equation to describe something doesn't mean the equation reflects reality.
Back to top
ron
Wed Jun 24 2009, 05:51AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
CO2 is a gas excreted by any number of processes, from composting of dead vegetable matter to the waste product of an mammal and some other animals. And it is the most stable food source for plants, who give off waste product in the form of oxygen. So, more CO2 means more plants producing more oxygen. No, I fear that we could alter local environment by continuing to produce engines that, more and more, release water vapor as a waste product. But I could be worrying about nothing. Water vapor creates clouds which have a mediating effect. But, of all the gases, it is water vapor that can have an effect. From basic chemistry water is H2O. That's the fluid to watch.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jun 27 2009, 07:20PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
In the crawling news links on the left, there was a study showing that meso cycles of wind flow are also due to landscape differentials.

Specifically, between snow fields and non-snow fields. I think I can explain it different terms.

In physics, energy moves from high state to low state, unless acted upon by an outside force, which is usually another high energy state. Conservation of mass and energy, basic physics, found in both newtonian and quantum theories. Anyway, land without snow is often warmer and so wind would flow from there to the snow fields. In doing so, this creates a low pressure in the warm area, which allows other wind to flow into it, and the wind rushing over snowfields is cooled and flows on until it runs into warmer areas. Nature's air conditioning. These effects have more to do with snow melt or snow accumulation than anything that could possibly be attributed to CO2 or even methane.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:02AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
The practice of adjusting math and results to support a theory is not new nor specific to AGW. It has been done before, most specifically, with Einstein's theories of relativity and also Quantum Mechanics, as based on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

These theories, such as the Special Theory of Relativity, were based on legitimate problems of perception. The problem was how does one measure the true speed of light since there is no final frame of reference to measure it from? From Newton, velocities were additive. If two cars are moving toward each other at 30 mph the impact should be a combination of both velocities or the effect of one car hitting an immobile object at 60 mph. And, in accident investigations, this is exactly what they do. The new smart radar that police have is able to subtract the motion of the police car and determine the speed of your car. But according to Einstein, velocities are non-additive.

A little history. Clerk Maxwell successfully combined the theories of magnetism and electricity and came up with field-effect equations and a theoretical calculation of the speed of electromagnetic behavior, of which light is often associated. Roughly, 186,282 miles per second. This was supported experimentally later on by measuring to one frame of reference, the sun. Some light leaves the sun and takes, on average, 8 minutes and 43 seconds to reach the Earth. Many physicists, such as FitzGerald and Lorentz believed there was an aether, a sub-space sort of fabric against which objects of mass would encounter friction or other effects. FitzGerald thought length and time measurements would elongate or contract in contact with this aether and Lorentz came up with equations to describe this, known as the Lorentzian Transforms.

Michelson and Morely tested for the aether and could find none. Shining lights due east and due west, with the direction of the earth's spinning, the addition of velocities against and with the aether should have produced lines of intereference as the light is accelerated in one direction and decelerated in the other direction. No such evidence was found. This experiment led Einstein to say that there was no aether.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:09AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
But Einstein felt that light must be the same speed regardless of frame of reference because it had been measure to be so, right here, in spite of the movement of the earth, the solar system, the galaxy, the universe itselt. Therefore, for some reason, the speed of light is the same every where and should be measured as such, whether you are in motion or at rest because there is no final frame of reference where you are one or the other. That's all fair enough. But others asked, if nothing could travel faster than light, what about light? Einstein said light was a particle without mass as gravity acts on objects of mass. Yet, we can see light bending it's trajectory around an object such as the moon.

That's what led to the General Theory, brought on by Einstein's use of the Lorentzian Transforms. That's right, Einstein used aether math to describe his general theory. That objects of math bend space and time in their vicinity. Light follows in this time-space fabric and follows the contortions of it, such as the gravity well of a planet. It does describe the effect of it nicely and many took this as proof of the theory. But that doesn't mean the theory is correct. It's not much better than saying the sun orbits around the earth because it does appear that way and that theory worked for eons.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:22AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
So, let's go with the idea that light is a special particle, not subject to the same laws as everything else. That it is massless, per Einstein's earliest summations. And that light cannot be measured at any speed greater than c. Why should that rule affect objects that have mass? And how do you know that you are not travelling faster than the speed of light? What are you measuring from? Relativity works both ways. To be fair, Einstein, by his own admission, was lousy at math, experience particular difficulty with algebra.

He got hoisted by his own petard in when studying particle physics. In an analysis similar to Poincare's 3-body problem, the only solution that made sense with the evidence was a vector analysis that was the result of the addition of velocities of both particles. Velocities of high speed particles were additive. Einstein said so in his own notes, in the original german.

Then there is his work in QM with Rosen and Podolsky in what became known as the EPR Event.

Due to the conservation of mass and energy in QM, there is a glitch that disproves the limit of the speed of light. Electrons have "spin", a direction of alignment. Usually noted as spin up or spin down for clarity's sake. Whatever the spin is on the nearest electron, the electron on the opposite side of the orbit must have the opposite spin. Always.

If you place an electron micropscope to look at the spin of the electron, the field of the microscope will exert a field effect and it will align the spin up or down. The spin of the opposite side electron must have the other spin. And this happens simultaneously, as in zero time elapsed in synchronization. How can this happen if nothing travels faster than light? This would happen in a microscopic atom, it would happen in an atom the size of the solar system. Darn that Heisenberg, hang him from the highest tree.

Essentially, Einstein falsified his own theory through Quantum Mechanics.

Einstein himself assumed much of his work would be proven wrong and it is only the Einstein faithful that keep the theory alive. They do so with math. They keep adding transforms until the evidence matches the theory. I've seen the Lorentz Group treatment in topology where a hyperbolic trig function is constructed to reflect the transforms, but that's simply another way of using the math to alter data to fit a theory. Like Rev. Billy Graham using 1^3 to show how God is a trinity of personalities. That's fine as long as you ignore the general function of 1^n where n is any number, which proves polytheism, rather than judeo-christianity.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:23AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
So, I see the same thing in AGW. Where they are constantly making "adjustments" until whatever data presented is altered and fits the original theory. That is not science, that is religion. 1^3
Back to top
Moderators: Admin, Kristen Byrnes, R.Danneskjöld, MMulligan

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English