Main Menu
Google Search
Google
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

***
NewsBusters - Global Warming

» WashPost 'Humorist' Tries to Decide If Caveman Conservatives Belong in 8,000 B.C. or 3,000,000 B.C.

» CBS Shamelessly Hypes Climate Change Will Cause More Turbulence For Airplanes

» Imagine That: 45 Days After Predicted 'Irreversible Collapse,' Antarctic Sea Ice Sets New Record

» NYT: Scientists 'Startled' at Great Lakes' Rise; Another Warmist Prediction Is Biting the Dust

» As Wind Farm Gets Permit to Kill Eagles, AP's Scott Smith Claims Wind Energy Has 'Exploded' Under Obama

» Column: It's the Global Warming Alarmists Who Are the Real 'Deniers'

» ‘Big Three’ Networks Ignore Supreme Court Ruling on EPA’s Emissions Regulations

» President Obama Mocks Climate Deniers In UC Irvine Commencement Address

» Obama and Showtime Admit to Exploiting Extreme Weather Events to ‘Shift’ Public Opinion

» AP Reports Another Data-Free South Florida Rising Sea Fable

» PBS Anchor: 'Why Does the White House Rub Salt Into the Wound' of Red-State Democrats With EPA Emissions Crackdown?

» Politico Produces 5,900 Words on 'Less in Control' Obama; All Scandals Except HealthCare.gov Unmentioned

» Daily Show Targets Anti-Vaxxers As ‘Left-Leaning Idiocy’

» ABC Spends Twice As Much Time on Hedgehogs Than New EPA Regulations

» Jake Tapper Takes on EPA Head Over New Climate Change Regulations, Lack of Dem. Support

» CBS Hails 'Groundbreaking' New EPA Regulations on Climate Change, Skips Job Risk

» NY Times' Davenport Nudges Obama from Left to Lead World on Global Warming By Crippling US Coal

» 'Everyone Panic!' WashPost Humorist Mocks 'Ice Melt of Doom' Forecast

» Climate Change Crusader Brian Williams Admits 'Inexact Business of Any Forecast Beyond Five Days'

» CNN: 'Climate Change Deniers Aren't Listening to Scientists...Not Reading the Bible'

***
Science and Public Policy Institute

» Growth Response of Grassland Species to Elevated C02 When Water Stressed

» Effects of Increased C02 on Herbaceous Plant Pests

» Medieval Warm Period in Northern Europe

» Loblolly Pines Defy the Progressive Nitrogen Hypothesis

» Response of Crustaceans to Ocean Warming

» Energy Inefficiencies of Biofuels

» Response of Marine Plants to Changes in Temperature

» Biofuels: The Carbon Debt They Owe

» Medieval Warm Period in Japan

» Response of Corals to Ocean Acidification

» Interactive Effects of C02 and Water Stress on the Growth of Woody Plant Species

» Biofuels: Land and Water Concerns

» Medieval Warm Period in Upper North America

» Can Plants Evolve Fast Enough to Cope with Increased Drought?

» Health Promoting Effects of Elevated C02 on Common Food Plants

» Response of Corals to Ocean Acidification

» Effects of Ocean Acidification and Warming on Marine Echinoderms

» Effects of Elevated C02 on Soil Carbon Sequestration

» Biospheric Productivity in South America

» Killing Wildlife in the Name of Climate Change

» Natural Resource Adaptation: Protecting Resources and Economies

» The Interaction of C02 and Non-Ozone Air Pollutants on Plant Growth

» Global Cooling

» The Final Final IPCC AR5 WGI Report

» Rising Atmospheric C02 and Soil Erosion

***
Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis

***


» Was Lawson Right about the UK Floods?

» George Zimmerman’s Libel Lawsuit

» Abram et al 2014 and the Southern Annular Mode

» Mann’s new paper recharacterizing the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

» Threats from the University of Queensland

» IOP: expecting consistency between models and observations is an “error”

» The Cleansing of Lennart Bengtsson

» Mann Misrepresents the EPA – Part 1

» Turney in the Climategate Dossier

» Radiocarbon calibration and Bayesian inference

***
Watts Up With That?

» I wonder how this dedicated weather observer feels about having his readings adjusted by NCDC?

» New Climate Model Introduced, now with knobs!

» Greens go by air: Internal food fight over excutive response to airplane travel at Greenpeace – firings demanded

» New paper finds transient climate sensitivity to doubling of CO2 is about 1°C

» OCO: I can see your house emitting CO2 from here

» Of mountains, molehills, and noisy bumps in the sea-ice record

» New climate alarm mascot – white ringtail possums

» Claim: Antartica record high sea ice partially an artifact of an algorithm

» Mann’s Hockey Stick Goes Zombie

» ‘Goldilocks zone’ exoplanets would not be habitable without an ocean

» Claim: natural variation ‘masked’ global warming, creating ‘the pause’

» Claim: we should all be vegetarians to stop global warming

***
Global Warming News

» Shocker: Greens’ Favorite Court for “Sue and Settle” Is in California Bay Area

» How Undemocratic Is EPA’s Clean Power Plan?

» Solar Thermal: Hazard for Pilots?

» Platts Energy Week Review: Rep. Olson Shines, Ambassador Pascual Demonstrates Futility of Climate Diplomacy, U.S. Lucky to Lose the Great Global Green Race, and More

» James Delingpole Interviews CEI’s Myron Ebell on Climate Policy

» Law Professors to House Panel: “Race to the Bottom” Is a Myth (so why does EPA exist?)

» Solar Thermal Electric Generation: Still Not Cheap, Not Green?

» Weekend Media Roundup

» My Las Vegas Slide Show on the Bogus Keystone XL Controversy

» Cooler Heads Digest 11 July 2014

***
Fox News - Climate Change Stories

***
Michelle Malkin - Enviro-Nitwits

» Guy who operates dozens of jets and a spacecraft fleet to help save planet by giving up… hamburgers

» You’ll never guess what might have contributed to the current Iraq crisis

» Obama declares large areas of Pacific off limits so divers can retrieve his sunken approval rating

» With Iraq on the brink, John Kerry draws a red line on the oceans with help from Leonardo DiCaprio

» Obama slams climate change ‘deniers’ before firing up Air Force One to go play golf

***
DailyTech Michael Asher`s blog

» Will the Real Antarctica Please Stand Up?

» Global Warming May Decrease Hurricanes, Research Suggests

» Japanese Report Disputes Human Cause for Global Warming

» Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979

» A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the (Climate) Forum

» Climate Report Downgrades Ice Loss; Media Reports Opposite

» Princeton Physicist Calls Global Warming Science "Mistaken"

» Defying Predictions, Sea Level Rise Begins to Slow

» Electric Car Sales in Freefall; Industry Risks Collapse

» Glaciers in Norway Growing Again

***
C3 - Climate Cycles Change

» Latest Research: "Extreme" Climate Change & Recent Weather Disasters Don't Correlate

» NASA Research Indicates Pre-1950 Climate Change Greater - Modern Global Warming Tepid

» NOAA Confirms: Climate Warming Due To Temperature Fabrication, Not Empirical Measurements

» “While the planet burns” – Elites & Cronies Deny Empirical Science, Push Climate Policies To Enrich Themselves

» Extreme Climate Change: Abrupt, Accelerating & Unequivocal Global Warming - Ooops, UK Confirms Not Happening

» Connect The Dots: Is CO2 Turning Earth's Atmosphere Into A Venus Cauldron As Predicted?

» CO2 Emission Reductions: Since Kyoto Protocol Of 1997, U.S. Outperforms Major World Regions

» State-Of-The-Art Satellite Technology Provides Proof: CO2's Almost Non-Existent Global Warming Influence

» NOAA Confirms: Huge CO2 Emissions Have Zero Impact On U.S. Maximum Temperatures

» Climate Change FactCheck: UK Analysis Confirms CO2 Emissions Not Producing Unprecedented, Irreversible & Accelerating Global Warming

» Those Stubborn Facts: NOAA's Empirical Climate Records Reveal Truth, Modern Warming Same As Pre-1950 Natural Warming

» Straight-Talking Obama/Democrats’ Climate Plan: All Cost, No Benefit & Mucho Pain

» Newest Research: NOAA Adds Extreme Global Warming Bias To U.S. Climate Records

» Obama's Claim That Modern Severe Weather Is "Unprecedented" Due To CO2 Is Empirically False

» Extreme Drought: New Research Confirms Human CO2 Not Causing A Global Drought Increase

***
CATO - Global Warming

» How Much Digital Reading Stays inside You?

» D.C. Forgets about the Debt

» Pointless Lying about US China Policy

» Why Putin's Proxy War an Abject Failure

» Sweden and School Choice

» An Exceptional America Is More than Just American Exceptionalism

» Government Corruption on the Rampage

» D.C. Circuit to IRS: Only Congress Can Change the Law

» The Child Migrant Crisis Is Just the Latest Disastrous Consequence of America’s Drug War

» U.S. Should Stay out of Latest Sectarian Civil War: Leave Islamic Radicals to Iraq and Its Neighbors

» Just One Way to Stop Corporate Inversions: Cut Taxes

» The Threat to the Scientific Method

» Reflections on the Misery Index

» The Fed Can't Fix What Ails the Economy

» Meeting Terrorists Is a Journalist’s Duty, Not Sedition

» Obama Says He Ended the "War on Drugs." Don’t Believe Him

» Reform Conservatism's Blind Spot: Foreign Policy

» A Case for the Libertarian

» Why Aren't Child Migrants Fleeing to the U.S. From Nicaragua?

» Driverless Cars Yes, V2I No!

» U.S. Abides Global Trade Rules...Just Ignore the Steel Protectionism, Antidumping Abuse, WTO Violations, Etc.

» A Titan Falls

» China Courts South Korea: Opportunities and Risks for the United States

» Without Obama Being Charged with Impeachment, Who Are We As Americans?

» Why the Rand Paul-Rick Perry Feud over Iraq Is Good for U.S. Policy

***
CanadaFreePress - Global Warming

***
More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

---
Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.









Headlines

»130 Environmental Groups Call For An End To Capitalism
»Update: 40 Greenpeace staff members seek dismissal of director who commuted by plane to work
»Climate change hits all Pentagon operations, official says
'The changing climate affect the full range of Department activities, including plans, operations, t ...
»Study: global warming ‘pause’ momentary, higher temps ahead
»The Pause: Warmaholics tie themselves in knots
»Warmist Christ Mooney warns about ‘Global warming denial’: ‘Not only is it a dangerous delusion, it’s an incredibly prevalent one’
»WaPo’s reporter goes full astrology: ‘Attack of the Chicago climate change maggots’ – ‘Storms are not an act of God, the suit claimed, but a carbon-driven reality’
Farmer’s Insurance Co. sued the city of Chicago for failing to prepare for the effects of global war ...
»Antarctica Sea Ice Sets Another Daily Record For Expansion
»Arctic Approaches Ten Year Summer Sea Ice Maximum
»Obama attributes wildfires to climate change
He says, vA lot of it has to do with drought, a lot of it has to do with changing precipitation patt ...


Date published: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:11:00 +0000
Details

»June 2014 Update of SSM/I Ocean Products
The SSM/I and SSMIS series of microwave imagers, operating since July 1987, provide global oceanic m ...
»Intellectual and Practical Foolishness: The Precautionary Principle
The Precautionary Principle (PP) underlies a wide variety of policy efforts around the world today, ...
»2014 Global SST Not Looking Like a Record…So Far
I was perusing Bob Tisdale’s analysis of global average sea surface temperatures (SST) through ...
»Heartland’s 9th International Conference on Climate Change: A Skepticism Tipping Point?
I’ve been thinking about the recent “skeptics conference” in Las Vegas. First of a ...
»My ICCC9 Presentations
Following my detour through California after attending the 9th International Conference on Climate C ...
»The Ivanpah Solar Energy Plant
After attending Heartland’s 9th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC9) in Las Vega ...
»ICCC9: Familar Faces in Las Vegas
The 9th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC9), organized by the Heartland Institute, is ...
»The EPA Now Trying to Garnish Citizens’ Wages
On the day we celebrate our liberties, it is ironic — and troubling — that the EPA is at ...
»Hurricane Arthur: Latest Satellite & Radar
Refresh the page for the latest: Latest radar loop: Our Hurricane Arthur page at Weatherstreet.com.
»UAH Global Temperature Update for June, 2014: +0.30 deg. C
The Version 5.6 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for June, 2014 is +0.30 d ...


Date published: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:27:06 +0000
Details

»Computer Models as “Evidence”
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog The BBC has decided not to every talk to climate skeptics again, in par ...
»Another Plea to Global Warming Alarmists on the Phrase “Climate Denier”
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog Stop calling me and other skeptics “climate deniers“.  No o ...
»My Thoughts on Steven Goddard and His Fabricated Temperature Data Claim
Cross-posted from Coyote Blog. Steven Goddard of the Real Science blog has a study that claims that ...
»The Thought Experiment That First Made Me A Climate Skeptic
Please check out my Forbes post today.  Here is how it begins: Last night, the accumulated years of ...
»Explaining the Flaw in Kevin Drum’s (and Apparently Science Magazine’s) Climate Chart
Cross-Posted from Coyoteblog I won’t repeat the analysis, you need to see it here.  Here is th ...
»If You Don’t Like People Saying That Climate Science is Absurd, Stop Publishing Absurd Un-Scientific Charts
Reprinted from Coyoteblog science a “myth”.  As is usual for global warming supporters, ...
»Update On My Climate Model (Spoiler: It’s Doing a Lot Better than the Pros)
Cross posted from Coyoteblog In this post, I want to discuss my just-for-fun model of global tempera ...
»Climate Goundhog Day
I posted something like this over at my other blog but I suppose I should post it here as well.  Fol ...
»Amherst, MA Presentation, March 7
I will be rolling out version 3.0 of my presentation on climate that has already been around the Int ...
»Climate De-Bait and Switch
Dealing with facile arguments that are supposedly perfect refutations of the climate skeptics ...


Date published: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:35:15 +0000
Details

»Leading Climate Scientist Defects: No Longer Believes in the ‘Consensus’
By James Delingpole - One of the world’s most eminent climate scientists – for several d ...
»Global Warming and Settled Science
By Andre Lofthus The AGW community would have you believe that the science in favor of AGW is settle ...
»The Tragedy of Earth Day
By Doug L. Hoffman - It is Earth Day today, a chance for all tree huggers, green activists and other ...
»Climate scientist’s emails are shielded from disclosure, Virginia Supreme Court says
By Debra Cassens Weiss - The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a climate scientist’s emails are ...
»Global Warming’s Upside-Down Narrative
By Bjorn Lomborg - When politicians around the world tell the story of global warming, they cast it ...


Date published: Thu, 08 May 2014 20:29:04 +0000
Details

»Was Lawson Right about the UK Floods?
In February 2014, Nigel Lawson and Brian Hoskins (Chair of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change ...
»George Zimmerman’s Libel Lawsuit
Last week, a Florida court dismissed the libel suit of George Zimmerman e.g. here. In today’s ...


Date published: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:01:31 +0000
Details

»Growth Response of Grassland Species to Elevated C02 When Water Stressed
As the air's CO2 content continues to rise, nearly all of earth's plants should exhibit increases in ...
»Effects of Increased C02 on Herbaceous Plant Pests
Kerslake et al. (1998) grew five-year-old heather (Calluna vulgaris) plants that they collected from ...
»Medieval Warm Period in Northern Europe
Was there really a global Medieval Warm Period? The IPCC used to acknowledge there was; but they hav ...
»Loblolly Pines Defy the Progressive Nitrogen Hypothesis
As part of one of the most outstanding of such studies ever to be conducted, Finzi and Schlesinger ( ...
»Response of Crustaceans to Ocean Warming
According to Storch et al. (2009), "temperature is often invoked as the main determinant of distribu ...
»Energy Inefficiencies of Biofuels
How efficient is it to produce energy from biofuels-is it more, less, or about the same as from trad ...
»Response of Marine Plants to Changes in Temperature
According to the IPCC, CO2-induced global warming will be net harmful to the world's marine species. ...
»Biofuels: The Carbon Debt They Owe
In an article entitled "Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt," Fargione et al. (2008) explore w ...
»Medieval Warm Period in Japan
The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was a global climatic anomaly that encompassed a few centuries on eit ...
»Response of Corals to Ocean Acidification
Over the years, a number of researchers have postulated that many of Earth's corals are destined to ...


Date published: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:35:38 +0000
Details

»Claim only four lemuroid possums found in the Daintree since 2005
I noticed this “lemuroid ringtail possum” story over at Anthony Watts. It is something I ...
»Australian taxpayers have a miniscule win as Paralana geothermal project in outback SA is shelved
Our ABC reports – Petratherm shelves Paralana geothermal project in outback SA – apparen ...
»Your chance to vote in support of the GreenLabor plan for an Emissions Trading Scheme or ETS
Just a few quick clicks – at www.taxpayers.org.au/poll be sure to pass on to your friends.
»Carbon tax repeal today but at what cost – what strings attached
A welcome step but this has been such a drama and with so many amendments I think it will be some ti ...
»“National Night-time Hotspot” (NNTHS) errors still in BoM temperature anomaly maps 2002-2007
In February I wrote about persistent errors in BoM min temperature anomaly maps over a station in th ...
»How long does it take the Australian BoM to fix a simple 10°C error in their AWAP temperature anomaly maps?
On the 5th I posted – Southwest Queensland heat wave 2 July 2014 – pointing out the 10 d ...
»Global warming strikes Queensland – Brisbane has coldest morning in 103 years
Brisbane records coldest morning in 103 years – despite the ever growing urban heat island ...
»Laugh of the week – Labor “care for community”
Just spotted this gem – almost choked on my morning cocoa – the full article is here ...
»Is this how the end of the mining boom looks ?
A reader sent this in for posting – how we are often fed a load of utter chaff by the media. W ...
»Prime Minister Abbott should accumulate Senate triggers for a double dissolution election and then “go the double”
Let the Australian electorate decide if they want the Carbon Tax to stay or be repealed – do t ...


Date published: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:39:06 +0000
Details
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Joel Carlson
What do all the green plants on earth need to prod[more ...]
07/17 12:10

Posted by Anonymous
http://cpubuilds.com offers some insight into glob[more ...]
06/15 13:46

Posted by Anonymous
Global warming - this is old news for everyone! I [more ...]
02/27 12:28

Posted by Anonymous
Interesting blog about Global Warming in space. Th[more ...]
02/22 09:27

Posted by Anonymous
I want to thank you for this wonderful blog. And I[more ...]
02/22 08:21

Posted by Anonymous
Interesting blog about climate and global warming.[more ...]
02/22 08:18

Posted by Anonymous
Interesting blog about climate and global warming.[more ...]
02/22 08:15

Posted by Anonymous
It has long been began talking about global warmin[more ...]
02/10 13:34

Posted by Anonymous
As leaders from athwart the earth encounter to pro[more ...]
02/06 00:50

Posted by Anonymous
A unprecedented spill parameterization in the ocea[more ...]
02/06 00:48

Relevant Sponsors

Donations
Any Amount helps support improvements





* or *


Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame
"SKEPTIC"

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame
"Liberty"

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Welcome
Username:

Password:


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto http://GlobalWarmingHoax.com on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

Forums
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>   
Layman's science

Author Post
ron
Fri Jun 19 2009, 09:13PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
Often is the time where the common man, such as myself, is disenfranchised from scientific debate because we lack the creds, such as a BS, MS, or PhD addended to our name.

That's never stopped me. I've been to college a few times. I am an electrician and started doing electrical work in March of 1983. I have been studying electricity, electrical theory, electronics, physics, and math since about Ocotber of 1974. It was a pivotal year. We moved from California to Texas and my step-grandfather began giving me books and introducing me to that most wonderous treasure, the public libray. You can read about anything you want to learn and no one can stop you.

In organized education and on my own, I have also studied particle physics, linear algebra, n-space geometry, topology, mult0-variable calculus. I've studied a few years of german and have read Einstein's notes in English and the original German. And I have studied basic physics. For the most part, most of us can get by with Newton. When it comes to electrical work, the Bohr model is accurate enough to do what we do. Quantum Mechanics offers some interesting interpretations but if you are an electrician working on an energized circuit, you are safer viewing it from the Bohr perspective.

Anyway, my lack of credentials has not stopped me from reading and trying to understand topics such as global climate. And my background of science and math studies makes it hard for me to ignore the glaring inconsistencies and faults of what I see in the AGW mindset. Granted, we can influence our local environment greatly. I know I have. At times, I've had an attack of gas that ran everyone off. Now, that's influencing the local environment. But it doesn't change the world, at large.

At the basis of science is the practice of observation and the use of the scientific method in testing theories and hypotheses. Collect evidence and make a theory. Test the theory. It may hold until other evidence comes along. If evidence invalidates the theory, either adjust the theory or scrap it all together and make a new theory that accounts for the new evidence, as well as the old evidence. That is science. To adjust data to fit a theory is fantasy. And I see that happening with AGW. It doesn't matter what the evidence is, it is interpreted as supporting AGW. All they have to do is adjust their equations or dream a new causality and their theory is safe, once again. Well, that's just fantasy. Ordinarily, it would be something to chuckle at. The scary thing, is that is has become political and an industry.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jun 20 2009, 08:46AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
Many people do not understand the process of feedback, nor have they been studying electron behavior for as long as I have. There are essentially two types of feed back. Positive feedback and negative feedback. In electronics, the feedback is set by how a transistor is biased for operation. It is often used to modulate a waveform or action. In a transistor operating as an amplifier, the source and the collector are operating at a power factor larger than the input. All the input does is introduce changes of charge in the gate or grid. The change of a few microvolts creates changes in what conducts across the junction. This is negative feedback. In positive feedback the junctions would conduct into saturation, such as the old flip-flop circuits upon which modern computers are based. Those are actually basic simple processes to understand.

In climate, however, there are more factors at play. Clouds are a great example of negative feedback. A cloudy day does several things. The cloud cover holds in some heat from the ground but it also reflects heat back into space from the topside. So, it may not get too hot but it will also not get too cold. That is, the response to one stimulus creates another response that has a remediating or sometimes opposite effect that prevents something from cycling out of control. To the greatest extent, that is how nature works. Concepts of physics and thermodynamics can most easily be described as whether or not something is acted upon by an outside force. The mistake most often made by some people in considering what the climate does is that they do not consider the most powerful outside source, an uncontrolled nuclear reactor 94 million miles above our heads. The ones who say that it doesn't influence us much are simply wrong. That's not an insult or a political point, they are simply wrong. The eruption of one volcano in the effect of reflective aerosols reflecting heat back to space can create a temporary climate change here simply by reducing the amount of sunlight that gets through.

But feedback has a modulating effect. A particular warm season can cause more ice to melt, which changes temp and salinity in the ocean which changes currents and evaporation rates which changes could formation, rain events, cloud cover. And those are mechanisms that have moderating effects. More cloud cover equals more temp equilibrium, more rain, more precipitation in cold climates, which creates more snow and ice that reflect more heat away creating even colder temperatures. Negative feedback.
Back to top
Denny
Sat Jun 20 2009, 06:58PM
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Ron, great posts, both of them...keep it up! We appreciate the input!

Denny
Back to top
ron
Sun Jun 21 2009, 07:54AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
Thanks, Denny. I think if I can explain in layman terms, others can understand it easier. Much of actual evidence is displayed in dot graphs and mathematical concepts, which is a language all it's own, but I try to keep things simple, at least for myself.

One of the biggest mistakes in the AGW is a difference of pardigm that does, in fact, ignore the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. AGW believers treat the Earth as a closed system, which it is not. Yes, we have an atmosphere and magnetic belt, but those don't seal us off from the universe at large. Changes in the Sun's behavior do have an effect here. To deny that is to close your eyes and say the sun is not shining. Doing that is like the kid who plugs his ears and says "nanner nanner" so he doesn't have to hear what the adults are saying. Pretending something doesn't exist does not actually make it go away.

Along with the cessation of sunspot activity, there is also precession of orbits. Earth's orbit is not a perfect circle and it varies from slight eliptic to more eliptic. Also, the sun has it's own orbit and does not spin in one exact geometric spot. So, there will be times when the sun is farther away and we are farther and the sunpost cycle is low. And this will have an effect on the weather. It will get colder and all the coal-fired power plants in the world can't stop it. In the not too distant future, we will be praying for some global warming.

Changes may not happen right away. It's June here in Texas. The jetstream has set a ridge over us so the warm air comes from the south and the high pressure and temp inversion knocks down any storms. So, we have highs in the 90's. But summers could drop off gradually. We usually get days and weeks of 100 + F and we call that August. At first, we may only get a few number of days over 100. But year after year a pattern will develope. So, some might say, yeah right. Time will tell. We've already had colder than average winters recently.

Warming is not the problem. Plants grow like crazy when you give them sun, CO2, and water. They don't grow much at all when covered in snow or in temps that don't get above 65 F. That's why people build solariums and hot houses. So they can grow plants in winter, by trapping heat.

Something interesting I have read. Most every knows that CO2 only absorbs and re-emits readiation at a few distinct frequencies. Furthermore, it reaches a saturation point, for lack of a better description. It only absorbs and re-emits to a certain level and is incapable of absorbing more heat or radiation more heat. As a "greenhouse gas," it leaves much to be desired. Or, in other words, at a certain point, it is transparent to heat. It cannot contribute much of anything to global warming.

No, the CO2 scare is thanks to Gore, who didn't get to be president but is still hell-bent on power.
Back to top
Denny
Sun Jun 21 2009, 03:31PM
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Say AMEN! I like your Common Sense! Stick around, we need you here!
Back to top
ron
Tue Jun 23 2009, 07:23PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
A question was raised and not answered in the chatbox. The Med Warm period was much warmer than today and more CO2 was in much more abundance, in spite of the current AGW desire to re-align graphs and show that we are near that now. Anyway, the question was asked, how come much higher levels of CO2 did not cause runaway warming and why did the globe, in fact, cool from that? The short answer is that CO2 is not the greenhouse gas that many imagine it to be. And that the sun has more effect than some can admit. And that nature operates on negative feedback. To argue against the past of nature is foolish and unscientific. But you can't hardly stop religious frenzy that wishes to believe one thing regardless of all evidence.
Back to top
ron
Tue Jun 23 2009, 07:33PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
I suppose I can make these layman viewpoints because if someone can, with no doubt, a serious face, contend that CO2 precedes temp, i.e., make statements of fantasy (statements that may or may not coincide with science) then I can certainly put my two cents in there.

Simple fact of the matter is that despite theories that the polar cap sea ice could melt, Caps are growing thicker, glaciers are growing thicker, we have had two record breaking winters in a row. Snow in Iraq? Normally, one could read something like that in science fiction, like that movie with Dennis Quaid where it is snowing in the desert. But now, that actually happened just recently. Snow in North Dakota in June? Don't be silly. Oops, that happened a few weeks ago.

And incredibly cold and nasty weather down under. Normally, Christchurch, New Zealand is the last port of call before going to Antarctica. But sometimes, it's to cold in the southern hemisphere's winter to accomplish much.

The signs are ripe for an ice age. The sun, the cycles of ice ages, the signs, here and there. I do not see cold, snowy winters as a sign of global warming. That's like saying that it's night time because the sun is out. Then again, if it is a matter of faith, one coud say just about anything and justify it.

The other problem I have is with the use of math to support a theory rather than describe an effect. What happens modernly, is that the evidence doesn't fit the theory so the math is adjusted until it does fit. That isn't science. That is fiction, fantasy. And math's weakness is that you can use it to state anything. The Rev. Billy Graham once used the equation 1^3 to show how God could be a trinity. The problem is, the general function is 1^n, which would also prove polytheism, which was not his intent but there you go. Just because someone can use an equation to describe something doesn't mean the equation reflects reality.
Back to top
ron
Wed Jun 24 2009, 05:51AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
CO2 is a gas excreted by any number of processes, from composting of dead vegetable matter to the waste product of an mammal and some other animals. And it is the most stable food source for plants, who give off waste product in the form of oxygen. So, more CO2 means more plants producing more oxygen. No, I fear that we could alter local environment by continuing to produce engines that, more and more, release water vapor as a waste product. But I could be worrying about nothing. Water vapor creates clouds which have a mediating effect. But, of all the gases, it is water vapor that can have an effect. From basic chemistry water is H2O. That's the fluid to watch.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jun 27 2009, 07:20PM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
In the crawling news links on the left, there was a study showing that meso cycles of wind flow are also due to landscape differentials.

Specifically, between snow fields and non-snow fields. I think I can explain it different terms.

In physics, energy moves from high state to low state, unless acted upon by an outside force, which is usually another high energy state. Conservation of mass and energy, basic physics, found in both newtonian and quantum theories. Anyway, land without snow is often warmer and so wind would flow from there to the snow fields. In doing so, this creates a low pressure in the warm area, which allows other wind to flow into it, and the wind rushing over snowfields is cooled and flows on until it runs into warmer areas. Nature's air conditioning. These effects have more to do with snow melt or snow accumulation than anything that could possibly be attributed to CO2 or even methane.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:02AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
The practice of adjusting math and results to support a theory is not new nor specific to AGW. It has been done before, most specifically, with Einstein's theories of relativity and also Quantum Mechanics, as based on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

These theories, such as the Special Theory of Relativity, were based on legitimate problems of perception. The problem was how does one measure the true speed of light since there is no final frame of reference to measure it from? From Newton, velocities were additive. If two cars are moving toward each other at 30 mph the impact should be a combination of both velocities or the effect of one car hitting an immobile object at 60 mph. And, in accident investigations, this is exactly what they do. The new smart radar that police have is able to subtract the motion of the police car and determine the speed of your car. But according to Einstein, velocities are non-additive.

A little history. Clerk Maxwell successfully combined the theories of magnetism and electricity and came up with field-effect equations and a theoretical calculation of the speed of electromagnetic behavior, of which light is often associated. Roughly, 186,282 miles per second. This was supported experimentally later on by measuring to one frame of reference, the sun. Some light leaves the sun and takes, on average, 8 minutes and 43 seconds to reach the Earth. Many physicists, such as FitzGerald and Lorentz believed there was an aether, a sub-space sort of fabric against which objects of mass would encounter friction or other effects. FitzGerald thought length and time measurements would elongate or contract in contact with this aether and Lorentz came up with equations to describe this, known as the Lorentzian Transforms.

Michelson and Morely tested for the aether and could find none. Shining lights due east and due west, with the direction of the earth's spinning, the addition of velocities against and with the aether should have produced lines of intereference as the light is accelerated in one direction and decelerated in the other direction. No such evidence was found. This experiment led Einstein to say that there was no aether.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:09AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
But Einstein felt that light must be the same speed regardless of frame of reference because it had been measure to be so, right here, in spite of the movement of the earth, the solar system, the galaxy, the universe itselt. Therefore, for some reason, the speed of light is the same every where and should be measured as such, whether you are in motion or at rest because there is no final frame of reference where you are one or the other. That's all fair enough. But others asked, if nothing could travel faster than light, what about light? Einstein said light was a particle without mass as gravity acts on objects of mass. Yet, we can see light bending it's trajectory around an object such as the moon.

That's what led to the General Theory, brought on by Einstein's use of the Lorentzian Transforms. That's right, Einstein used aether math to describe his general theory. That objects of math bend space and time in their vicinity. Light follows in this time-space fabric and follows the contortions of it, such as the gravity well of a planet. It does describe the effect of it nicely and many took this as proof of the theory. But that doesn't mean the theory is correct. It's not much better than saying the sun orbits around the earth because it does appear that way and that theory worked for eons.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:22AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
So, let's go with the idea that light is a special particle, not subject to the same laws as everything else. That it is massless, per Einstein's earliest summations. And that light cannot be measured at any speed greater than c. Why should that rule affect objects that have mass? And how do you know that you are not travelling faster than the speed of light? What are you measuring from? Relativity works both ways. To be fair, Einstein, by his own admission, was lousy at math, experience particular difficulty with algebra.

He got hoisted by his own petard in when studying particle physics. In an analysis similar to Poincare's 3-body problem, the only solution that made sense with the evidence was a vector analysis that was the result of the addition of velocities of both particles. Velocities of high speed particles were additive. Einstein said so in his own notes, in the original german.

Then there is his work in QM with Rosen and Podolsky in what became known as the EPR Event.

Due to the conservation of mass and energy in QM, there is a glitch that disproves the limit of the speed of light. Electrons have "spin", a direction of alignment. Usually noted as spin up or spin down for clarity's sake. Whatever the spin is on the nearest electron, the electron on the opposite side of the orbit must have the opposite spin. Always.

If you place an electron micropscope to look at the spin of the electron, the field of the microscope will exert a field effect and it will align the spin up or down. The spin of the opposite side electron must have the other spin. And this happens simultaneously, as in zero time elapsed in synchronization. How can this happen if nothing travels faster than light? This would happen in a microscopic atom, it would happen in an atom the size of the solar system. Darn that Heisenberg, hang him from the highest tree.

Essentially, Einstein falsified his own theory through Quantum Mechanics.

Einstein himself assumed much of his work would be proven wrong and it is only the Einstein faithful that keep the theory alive. They do so with math. They keep adding transforms until the evidence matches the theory. I've seen the Lorentz Group treatment in topology where a hyperbolic trig function is constructed to reflect the transforms, but that's simply another way of using the math to alter data to fit a theory. Like Rev. Billy Graham using 1^3 to show how God is a trinity of personalities. That's fine as long as you ignore the general function of 1^n where n is any number, which proves polytheism, rather than judeo-christianity.
Back to top
ron
Sat Jul 18 2009, 08:23AM
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
So, I see the same thing in AGW. Where they are constantly making "adjustments" until whatever data presented is altered and fits the original theory. That is not science, that is religion. 1^3
Back to top
Moderators: Admin, Kristen Byrnes, R.Danneskjöld, MMulligan

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English