Main Menu
Google Search
Current GWH News
Global Warming Hoax News From Around the Web

World Climate Report

» A Classic Tale of Global Warming Alarmism

» More Evidence Against a Methane Time Bomb

» Agriculture: Tropical Cyclones are Welcome Visitors

» Sea Level Acceleration: Not so Fast

» Hansen Is Wrong

» Earth’s Carbon Sink Still Strong and Growing

» Wild Speculation on Climate and Polar Bears

» Illiteracy at NASA

» The Heat Was On—Before Urbanization and Greenhouse Gases

» What’s to Blame for the Rains on the Plains?

NewsBusters - Global Warming

» CNN's Blitzer: 'I Don't Remember' Biden's Law School Plagiarism

» CNN's Chetry: 'Please Tell Me It's Not Lipstick Again'

» MRC Report Asks: Why No Fairness Doctrine for PBS?

Science and Public Policy Institute

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group

» Roger Pielke Sr. is now on Twitter!

» 2012 Climate Science Weblog in Review by Dallas Jean Staley – A Guest Post

» The Weblog Is Retiring

» Publication Of “Reply to “Comment On ‘Ocean Heat Content And Earth’s Radiation Imbalance. II. Relation To Climate Shifts’ ” by Nuccitelli Et Al. By Douglass and Knox 2012

» Q&A From A Group Of Retired NASA Personnel And Associates

» The Importance of Land Use/Land Practices On Climate – A Perspective From Jon Foley

» Interview With James Wynn In The English Department At Carnegie Mellon University

» University Of Alabama At Huntsville October 2012 Lower Tropospheric Temperature Analysis

» USA Election Day 2012

» New Paper “Climatic Variability Over Time Scales Spanning Nine Orders of Magnitude: Connecting Milankovitch Cycles With Hurst–Kolmogorov Dynamics” By Markonis And Koutsoyiannis


» Shukla’s Gold

» Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20

» The “Blade” of Ocean2K

» The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”

» Op Ed on Deflategate

» Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?

» Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error

» Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline

» Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?

» Goodell and Deflategate Science



Global Warming News

» 2014: Lowest U.S. Severe Weather Death Toll in Ten Years

» Reports: Renewable Fuel Standard Imposes $22 Billion Ethanol Tax on Illinois, $42 Billion Tax on California

» Manchin Shoots Hole Through EPA Power Plant Rule

» NY AG Schneiderman vs. Peabody Energy: Climate Thuggery, Part 2

» NY Attorney General Schneiderman Targets Exxon Mobil: Climate Thuggery, Part 1

» Is War on Coal the Cause of Confounding Increase in U.S. Electricity Bills?

» Lomborg Exposes Paris Accord’s Climatological Insignificance

» A Positive EPA Platform for Presidential Hopefuls

» Antarctica: Still No Time to Sell the Beach House?

» Motion to Stay Nails Unlawfulness of EPA “Clean Power Plan”








More Global Warming Hoax News Feeds

Since Exxon Hasn't Sent Us Our First Million Dollars Yet You're Welcome To Help Pay Our Bills Until They Do.


»​CBS News: ‘Should your turkey be taxed for climate change?’
»Emails Suggest Dem Sen. Whitehouse Is Behind The Effort To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
»Watch: Morano on Obama’s claim that UN summit will ‘rebuke’ ISIS: ‘Take that ISIS, we are going to hamstring our economies, limit our growth, kill our jobs’
Morano on Obama claiming a UN climate treaty will be a rebuke to ISIS: "Obama is essentially saying ...
»GLOBAL WARMING? NASA says Antarctic has been COOLING for past SIX years
»World facing ‘grave environmental crisis’, pope warns
»Predetermined: 2016 already declared ‘hottest year’
Reuters reports:
»Hollywood upset: Actor Mark Ruffalo: Obama ‘is almost worse than climate-change deniers’
New documentary challenges Obama
»Inhofe, leading climate change skeptic, may say ‘oui’ to Paris
»‘The science says Prince Charles is a fool to blame global warming for the Islamic State’
»Now Global Warming Believers Want To Take Away The Joy of Eating Steak

Date published: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:24:32 +0000

»6″-10″ of Global Warming for Chicago, Detroit
Up to 20 million midwest U.S. residents are about to get some significant pre-Thanksgiving snowfall. ...
»Spencer Points Out Hypocrisy; Blogosphere & Twitterverse Explodes
There I was, minding my own business, just making some sarcastic remarks on Facebook alluding to the ...
»40 Years Ago Today: The Big Lake Never Gave Up Her Dead
Today is the 40th anniversary of the sinking of the Great Lakes freighter Edmund Fitzgerald, on Nove ...
»Atlantic Hurricanes Down 80% from 10 Years Ago
As the 2015 Atlantic hurricane season nears its end, and as we enter the 11th year without a major h ...
»Well Bam, There it Is: Exxon Mobil Investigated by NY Attorney General
I suppose this was inevitable, and Exxon Mobil probably expected it as well. According to the Justin ...
»Skiers Rejoice! Up to 12 ft. of Snow Expected in the West
A series of Pacific storms mixed with some cold Canadian air is expected to result in up to 12 feet ...
»Models vs. Observations: Plotting a Conspiracy?
John Christy and I received an email today from Marcel Crok, who presented our satellite observation ...
»UAH V6.0 Global Temperature Update for October 2015: +0.43 deg. C
NOTE: This is the seventh monthly update with our new Version 6.0 dataset. Differences versus the ol ...
»Color Satellite Shows Texas Floodwaters Entering the Gulf
Most of the rain that fell on southeast Texas (up to 20 inches) will end up flowing into the Gulf of ...
»Patricia’s Tight Blue Eye
As Hyper-Hurricane Patricia approaches the western coast of Mexico with 190 mph sustained winds, sat ...

Date published: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:03:47 +0000

»Matt Ridley: What the Climate Wars Did to Science
I cannot recommend Matt Ridley’s new article strongly enough.  It covers a lot of ground be he ...
»Manual Adjustments in the Temperature Record
I have been getting inquiries from folks asking me what I think about stories like this one, where P ...
»Mistaking Cyclical Variations for the Trend
I titled my very first climate video “What is Normal,” alluding to the fact that climate ...
»Typhoons and Hurricanes
(Cross-posted from Coyoteblog) The science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes some warming is h ...
»Those Who Follow Climate Will Definitely Recognize This
This issue will be familiar to anyone who has spent time with temperature graphs.  We can ask oursel ...
»Layman’s Primer on the Climate Skeptic Position
I am a “lukewarmer”, which means a skeptic that agrees that man-made CO2 is incrementall ...
»When Climate Alarmism Limits Environmental Progress
One of my favorite sayings is that “years from now, environmentalists will look back on the cu ...
»Why We Are Exaggerating “Extreme Weather”
I have written in article at called Summer of the Shark, Global Warming Edition.  It desc ...
»HydroInfra: Scam! Investment Honeypot for Climate Alarmists
Cross-posted from Coyoteblog. I got an email today from some random Gmail account asking me to write ...
»Presentation: The Science of the Skeptic Position
Here is the most recent version of my presentation “Don’t Panic: The Science of the Clim ...

Date published: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:04 +0000

»China Burns Much More Coal Than Thought, Complicates COP21
New York Times BEIJING — China, the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases from coal, has been ...
»World’s bishops appeal to COP 21 delegates for ‘just and legally binding’ climate deal
National Catholic Reporter. The world’s bishops have a clear message for world leaders set, in barel ...
»Did A ‘Green’ Millionaire Persuade Sen. Ayotte To Support EPA’s Global Warming Rule?
By Michael Bastasch, Daily Caller EPA published a finalized version of its global warming rule in th ...
»France’s top weatherman sparks storm over book questioning climate change
By Henry Samuel, Telegraph Philippe Verdier, weather chief at France Televisions, the country ...
»Scientists Ask Obama To Prosecute Global Warming Skeptics
By Michael Bastasch – The science on global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate sci ...

Date published: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:59:32 +0000

»Shukla’s Gold
Roger Pielke Jr recently made the remarkable discovery that, in addition to his university salary fr ...
»Reckless Misinformation from Barry Klinger and the RICO 20
The RICO-20 gang of climate academics commenced its supposed campaign against misinformation with fa ...
»The “Blade” of Ocean2K
I’ve had a longstanding interest in high-resolution ocean proxies (with posts as early as 2005 ...
»The Ocean2K “Hockey Stick”
The long-awaited (and long overdue) PAGES2K synthesis of 57 high-resolution ocean sediment series (O ...
»Op Ed on Deflategate
In Financial Post here. My submitted version was a little harsher. #deflategate For related blog pos ...
»Did McNally Inflate One Football in the Washroom?
In today’s post,  I’m going to show the Deflategate data from a new perspective.   Rathe ...
»Letter to Daniel Marlow on Exponent Error
On June 29, I sent a letter to Ted Wells, notifying him of the erroneous description of key figures ...
»Exponent’s Trick to Exaggerate the Decline
In an earlier article,  I pointed out that essential figures in the Exponent report contained (what ...
»Who “Told” Exponent Not to Consider Switching Scenario?
The transcript of the Brady appeal before Goodell has been released and it’s astonishing to se ...
»Goodell and Deflategate Science
Yesterday, Roger Goodell released his decision on the Brady appeal. Most of the early discussion has ...

Date published: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:44:02 +0000

Date published: not known

»Syria rain history – I think they have other problems
Like many I noticed Prince Charles repeating the claim that climate change is responsible for the ri ...
»Is there a more pointlessly stupid Govt decision than leasing the Port of Darwin for 99 years?
Last month – Giles announces Port of Darwin leased for 99 years for $506 million – now ...
»Andrew Bolt was too critical of President Obama on his “The Bolt Report” TV show this morning
The exact point I want to make is that Andrew in his “The Panel” segment, was critical o ...
»Is this the best way to locate a needed nuclear waste storage facility ?
The ABC reports – Six sites shortlisted for Australia’s first nuclear waste dump; Govern ...
»BoM rain Outlook for Nov 2015 fails comprehensively in six days
Issued only on 29th October – the BoM rain Outlook for November crashed and burnt by the time ...
»New book – Australia’s Defence by David Archibald
David has sent me a 7.4MB 108 page pdf – great reading – many comparisons between the F- ...
»Hello El Nino rain – useful and crop saving in some places
There were areas of useful rain in NSW Qld too in the last week of October. 48hrs of rain dot maps a ...
»David Archibald writes in Quadrant on the possibility of conflict in the South China Sea
China’s Implacable Belligerence – All I can say is that if China wants war with the USA and ot ...
»Mining Engineer lays complaints to University of Queensland about the behaviour of staff related to climate issues
Read all about it – set out with crystal clarity at the website of Malcolm Roberts.
»Series of articles on climate and the IPCC by Peter F Gill a UK physicist
Peter has examined climate issues for many years and he has recently got a series of articles in a U ...

Date published: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:27:25 +0000
Latest Forum Posts
Posted by Anonymous
If you want to recover lost iPhone notes from iPho[more ...]
11/25 09:31

Posted by Anonymous
You may accidently deleted iPhone data and want to[more ...]
11/25 09:26

Posted by Anonymous
I recover sms from iPhone 5S with data recovery so[more ...]
11/20 08:20

Posted by JessonBill
Hi, Can I recover deleted text messages from iPhon[more ...]
11/07 19:00

Posted by Jesson Liu
Hey, do you folks know how to recoup erased photog[more ...]
11/07 18:58

Posted by Anonymous The insurance vendor w[more ...]
11/03 00:29

Posted by Anonymous The exposure will pay f[more ...]
11/03 00:28

Posted by Anonymous The rear seats[more ...]
11/03 00:27

Posted by Anonymous Certain Student ca[more ...]
11/03 00:26

Posted by Anonymous
Certain Student cards can perform students price r[more ...]
11/03 00:25

Relevant Sponsors

Any Amount helps support improvements

* or *

Advertise on this site

Road Gear

License Plate Frames
Support the Truth

Skeptic License Plate Frame

It's Natural License Plate Frame
"It`s Natural"

Liberty License Plate Frame

* MORE *
Strong and durable metal license plate holder. Uses full color high resolution images. UV and Water Protection. Satisfaction Guaranteed
RSS Feeds
Our news can be syndicated by using these rss feeds.


Remember me

[ ]
[ ]
Mobile Version
e107mobileYou can now visit us on your mobile phone! Simply goto on your mobile phone or PDA to get started!

<< Previous thread | Next thread >>   
Global Warming is Over: Don Esterbrook posted by Charlotte Ramotswe

Go to page       >>  
Begin New Thread
Author Post
Mon Dec 29 2008, 04:06PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178

In 2001 geologist Don Easterbook predicted the beginning of a period of global cooling. At a recent meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco he again predicted a period of cooling based in part on correlation between past glacial fluctuations, his area of expertise, with periods of low solar irradiance and changes in the Pacific Ocean:

“GLOBAL, cyclic, decadal, climate patterns can be traced over the past millennium in glacier fluctuations, oxygen isotope ratios in ice cores, sea surface temperatures, and historic observations. The recurring climate cycles clearly show that natural climatic warming and cooling have occurred many times, long before increases in anthropogenic atmospheric CO2 levels. The Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age are well known examples of such climate changes, but in addition, at least 23 periods of climatic warming and cooling have occurred in the past 500 years. Each period of warming or cooling lasted about 25-30 years (average 27 years). Two cycles of global warming and two of global cooling have occurred during the past century, and the global cooling that has occurred since 1998 is exactly in phase with the long term pattern. Global cooling occurred from 1880 to ~1915; global warming occurred from ~1915 to ~1945; global cooling occurred from ~1945-1977;, global warming occurred from 1977 to 1998; and global cooling has occurred since 1998. All of these global climate changes show exceptionally good correlation with solar variation since the Little Ice Age 400 years ago.

The IPCC predicted global warming of 0.6° C (1° F) by 2011 and 1.2° C (2° F) by 2038, whereas Easterbrook (2001) predicted the beginning of global cooling by 2007 (± 3–5 yrs) and cooling of about 0.3–0.5° C until ~2035. The predicted cooling seems to have already begun. Recent measurements of global temperatures suggest a gradual cooling trend since 1998 and 2007–2008 was a year of sharp global cooling. The cooling trend will likely continue as the sun enters a cycle of lower irradiance and the Pacific Ocean changed from its warm mode to its cool mode.

Comparisons of historic global climate warming and cooling, glacial fluctuations, changes in warm/cool mode of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and sun spot activity over the past century show strong correlations and provide a solid data base for future climate change projections. The announcement by NASA that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) had shifted to its cool phase is right on schedule as predicted by past climate and PDO changes (Easterbrook, 2001, 2006, 2007) and coincides with recent solar variations. The PDO typically lasts 25–30 years, virtually assuring several decades of global cooling. The IPCC predictions of global temperatures 1° F warmer by 2011, 2° F warmer by 2038, and 10° F by 2100 stand little chance of being correct. “Global warming” (i.e., the warming since 1977) is over.

The real question now is not trying to reduce atmospheric CO2 as a means of stopping global warming, but rather (1) how can we best prepare to cope with the 30 years of global cooling that is coming, (2) how cold will it get, and (3) how can we cope with the cooling during a time of exponential population increase? In 1998 when I first predicted a 30-year cooling trend during the first part of this century, I used a very conservative estimate for the depth of cooling, i.e., the 30-years of global cooling that we experienced from ~1945 to 1977. However, also likely are several other possibilities (1) the much deeper cooling that occurred during the 1880 to ~1915 cool period, (2) the still deeper cooling that took place from about 1790 to 1820 during the Dalton sunspot minimum, and (3) the drastic cooling that occurred from 1650 to 1700 during the Maunder sunspot minimum. Figure 2 shows an estimate of what each of these might look like on a projected global climate curve. The top curve is based on the 1945-1977 cool period and the 1977-1998 warm period. The curve beneath is based on the 1890-1915 cool period and 1915-1945 warm period. The bottom curve is what we might expect from a Dalton or Maunder cool period. Only time will tell where we’re headed, but any of the curves are plausible. The sun’s recent behavior suggests we are likely heading for a deeper global cooling than the 1945-1977 cool period and ought to be looking ahead to cope with it.

The good news is that global warming (i.e., the 1977-1998 warming) is over and atmospheric CO2 is not a vital issue. The bad news is that cold conditions kill more people than warm conditions, so we are in for bigger problems than we might have experienced if global warming had continued. Mortality data from 1979-2002 death certificate records show twice as many deaths directly from extreme cold than for deaths from extreme heat, 8 times as many deaths as those from floods, and 30 times as many as from hurricanes. The number of deaths indirectly related to cold is many times worse.

Depending on how cold the present 30-year cooling period gets, in addition to the higher death rates, we will have to contend with diminished growing seasons and increasing crop failures with food shortages in third world countries, increasing energy demands, changing environments, increasing medical costs from diseases (especially flu), increasing transportation costs and interruptions, and many other ramifications associated with colder climate. The degree to which we may be prepared to cope with these problems may be significantly affected by how much money we waste chasing the CO2 fantasy.

All of these problems will be exacerbated by the soaring human population. The current world population of about 6 ½ billion people is projected to increase by almost 50% during the next 30 years of global cooling (Figure 2). The problems associated with the global cooling would be bad enough at current population levels. Think what they will be with the added demands from an additional three billion people, especially if we have uselessly spent trillions of dollars needlessly trying to reduce atmospheric CO2, leaving insufficient funds to cope with the real problems.


Don J. Easterbrook is a geologist at the Department of Geology, Western Washington University. He has authored 8 books (including the text book Surface processes and landform Prentice Hall Publishing Co., 546 p.) ) and 150 journal publications.

This article is republished from Abstracts of American Geophysical Union annual meeting, San Francisco December, 2008.

Back to top
Tue Dec 30 2008, 12:02AMQuote
Guestwow, that was awesome... I can't believe the ignorance of so many people in the world when it comes to issues like "MMGW"
Back to top
Tue Dec 30 2008, 12:01PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178

It is this kind of information the Alarmists do not want everyone to hear. The Biased Media will not talk about this openly, to which, I use to see both sides in one article. That was some time ago! The Internet is the only means now that tells "Our" side effectively. Plus, Anonymous, there is a lot of Money to be had out there by the Alarmists thru Our Tax Dollars at hand...
Back to top
Sun Jun 28 2009, 08:53PMQuote
Registered Member #378
Joined: Sun Jun 14 2009, 09:02PM
Posts: 431
The only power left is the power of the people. When governments fail, people take matters into their own hands. I'm not justifying that, just observing it from history. From the relatively benign American Revolution to the blood-thirsty and chaotic French Revolution.

Other countries had enacted "green" legislation and were able to recant it later. I think we can do the same. We must impress upon our legislators that if they enact this craziness, that this will be their last term in office.

If I were the big oil companies, I would pull all my lobbyists back and say, fine, get elected on your own dime. See how far that gets you.
Back to top
Tue May 04 2010, 11:26AMQuote
Registered Member #528
Joined: Mon May 03 2010, 06:51PM
Posts: 9
Well, it appears this has already been disproven.
And the warming did not stop in 1998; 1998 was an exceptionally warm year, and subsequent year have been cooler than that. But, the trend still increasing.
Back to top
Tue May 04 2010, 02:18PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Saber, you cannot "trust" what the government states! You need to do MORE research. Read this article...and followup at the 700 peer review papers.

Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 12:22AMQuote
Registered Member #528
Joined: Mon May 03 2010, 06:51PM
Posts: 9
But, doesn't Dr. Spencer work for the government? For NASA? So his research is government research.
The link I provided is from NASA, the same place Spencer works.
I will do research into it later (read as: tomorrow). I wrote two papers today that involved a lot of research. I tried to look up stuff for this, but I'm shot, lol.
But, can you please clarify what makes a good government source and what makes a bad one. And is the AAAS safe in your mind? How about the NAS? Those are both very highly respected scientific organizations that have been around since looooong before anything about AGW was even thought of. I personally hold them in high esteem, even though I have found articles that I dont agree with ideologically, they have a very strict peer-review and will not publish articles with bad science. If something gets by them, they will post an articles that says they messed up and [blah] is not correct.
Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 04:07PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Saber, you are correct! My comment yesterday should have said, "a majority" cannot be trusted. Sorry! I know I sound "biased" in my comments. Since I've been "partially" retired and started to do some "serious" research on CAGW, I've concluded that the science didn't quite fit. Especially when I noticed the CAGW scientist couldn't be including ALL the required info in their models..They think they have but seriously climate science is in it's "infancy". Sure, as the years have passed technology has started to "mature" to the point of looking at Climate Globally and to some degree "more precise". But Man has a very long way to go to effect Climate Globally since I've done my personal research, Saber. I commend you on how you are approaching this issue...

The AAAS is an organization I'm not familiar with. NAS is a respectable organization with "peer reviewed" work. I found this at their web site, an article about how Shapiro is going to lead a group to review the IPCC. Here:

I do not think they have any stance as they shouldn't being their position is suppose to be based on Science. Now Nature is another issue. They are slowly coming around since "ClimateGate" occurred in Nov. 2009. This is an happenstance Saber you most definitely want to study. I have posted a lot of articles on this subject. Plus there are some very good sites that help too.

It's good that you ask questions...Let us know, we are here to help!
Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 04:32PMQuote
Registered Member #529
Joined: Tue May 04 2010, 07:49PM
Posts: 7
"The analysis, conducted by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year since modern records began in 1880."

this is only data from modern records. As the article states, these began in 1880, but it does not account for temperature changes that have been naturally increasing and decreasing for hundreds of thousands of years. The earliest data that is known (as far as I am aware) is from Antarctic Vostok Ice Core Data. Despite the fact that this is the warmest that the earth has been since at least the late 1800s, it is most certainly not the warmest summer that has occurred on our planet.

I've researched to make sure that the source was reliable, and i ended up finding Vostock Ice core data available here as well.

Denny, I don't believe that it is plausible to discredit all government data as being false. It can most certainly have errors or formulated opinions/observations, but then again all data on the internet is rather unreliable and it is up to us to decide what is able to be trusted. You are right to check other sources, but don't disregard all the data that government based programs present. After all, the Vostok Ice Core data came from the government. ;)

Even if you meant your statement to simply encourage researching further before posting, it did sound rather inconsiderate the way it was typed.

Back on the topic of the article that this thread started with, I honestly don't believe that the warming trend has stopped. I think that we still have quite a bit of warming in front of us, but after a few hundred years the earth will start cooling down. I'd love to see if I'm correct, but I'm pretty certain I'll be dead by then c:
Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 04:36PMQuote
Registered Member #529
Joined: Tue May 04 2010, 07:49PM
Posts: 7
Sorry, guess i posted a little late. Denny beat me to it, but I'm glad you were able to clear up what you said
Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 07:55PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Posted: Wed May 05 2010, 09:53PM

Hi Lucidity, congrats on coming a new member here. Yes, the temperature has gone up but in very small increases. The MAIN issue is WHAT is causing CAGW?
Check out the latest posting I did today here at I posted the article for you below...Bob Carter is someone you want to listen to...

Also, you need to read this article....

Lucidity, I recommend strongly on going into our "forums" and read what we have...If you are new to CAGW
Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 07:57PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Lucidity, here's the link to Bob Carter interview...

Sorry about that!!! ;-)
Back to top
Wed May 05 2010, 08:16PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Saber & Lucidity, read this article....very interesting!

and this one from William Briggs....does an excellent job on explaining....

and finally the latest in Skeptical Peer Reviewed Papers...700 of them! I had to break the article down into 5 posts! It starts here...recommend spending time here...

Hope this helps unless you have "already" concluded your opinion...
Back to top
Thu May 06 2010, 08:15PMQuote
Registered Member #529
Joined: Tue May 04 2010, 07:49PM
Posts: 7
Thanks, I'll have to check them out later. high school isn't all that generous with free time. I don't have a solid opinion yet, which is why I joined, and why I've been doing research on it. While I know that burning fossil fuels is damaging to the environment and air as a whole, I don't quite believe that it is responsible for global warming. We simply don't know enough about our earth to give a definite answer.

One thing I've been wondering about after thinking back to the link I posted earlier, was where all the C02 could have gone. The C02 levels and temperature seem to have changed naturally, and in a rather consistent pattern of warming an cooling. I really couldn't figure out logically how the C02 could simply disappear. Guess I'll look it up tomorrow though and see if I can find some info on it.

The worlds an amazing thing isn't it? c:
Back to top
Thu May 06 2010, 09:01PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Amanda, thanks for you insight on this issue. I appreciate you coming here to look at a side that wasn't noticiable until last Nov. when "ClimateGate" broke...A question in your statement where you said, "While I know the burning fossil fuels is damaging to the environment and air as a whole". If you are referring to "polution" then yes it can be when concentrated in medium to large cities with certain conditions...If you are referring it towards CO2 then no I have to disagree. There's NO "Empirical Evidence" that shows CO2 causing "excessive" CAGW...This is important for you to make a proper judgement on this...For if you don't, you will get caught up in the typical "Green" thought pattern that you will never get out of...

Thought you should know this...Let me or Us know here at should you need assistance..A personal question, Amanda, if I may....Is the "avitar" you???
Back to top
Thu May 06 2010, 09:09PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178

May I also invite you to read the latest from the recent "unheard" report of our air quality...Good read...EPA doesn't want people to know...

Always good news!!! Only if ONE heards of it! ;-)
Back to top
Fri May 07 2010, 03:10PMQuote
Registered Member #529
Joined: Tue May 04 2010, 07:49PM
Posts: 7
haha, yah, i was referring to the pollution caused by it, not the actual C02. The avatar isn't me. I'm just a deviantart junkie.

here's the artist

I've actually been doing art for 5 years, that's probably what my major will be in college.
Back to top
Fri May 07 2010, 04:11PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Amanda, that site was very "cool"... Thanks! And "thanks" for clearing up what you meant in the above statement!
Back to top
Fri May 07 2010, 04:20PMQuote
Registered Member #529
Joined: Tue May 04 2010, 07:49PM
Posts: 7
Well I've read the articles you've posted and searched around the internet a bit. I don't take making decisions about my opinions very lightly, but the 'evidence' of AGW seems less and less logical the more I look into it. In fact... I seem to be finding more solid and tangible evidence that disproves it. I've been looking up a lot about the oceans effect on temperature and C02 as well, which makes it easier for me to comprehend how the climate can change over time.

The only thing that I can't seem to figure out now is how the temperatures of the oceans change over time and what effect that change has on C02 absorption.
Back to top
Fri May 07 2010, 05:25PMQuote
Registered Member #140
Joined: Sun May 11 2008, 12:38PM
Posts: 2178
Amanda, may I recommend this article! Be sure to read the comments...There's very good responses from Science of Doom (Pro-CAGW) and David (Realist) who's site your at...very good conversation..

here's another from David's Blog:
A good read...A true scientist always looks for evidence to "defeat" his Theory, Amanda. This is what I strive for but so far the Alarmists only conjure up "repeated results...Sure, there are some new papers but these Climate Scientists use the "same" bases Computer Models to "drive" their predictions...Keep this in mind, always. I would like to state that it didn't take me long to find out how much of a "hoax" the CAGW agenda was...Did you see one of todays posting's?? Check this out!

Amanda, just "more" proof on how deception, lies and corruption come from the same type of Science...because this is "proof" of how they see with ALL of the Climate Taxes applied, and only a few so far from their ultimate plan, will corrupt countries to their foundations...Scarey isn't it. And you should be if you care...

Back to top
Go to page       >>  
Moderators: Admin, Kristen Byrnes, R.Danneskjöld, MMulligan

Jump:     Back to top

Begin New Thread

Quick Reply:


Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System
Translate to: French German Italian Spanish Portuguese GTM_LAN_DUTCH Russian Chinese Arabic Korean English